From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j4CD0EDJ007051 for ; Thu, 12 May 2005 13:00:14 GMT Received: from mails.dtic.mil ([131.84.1.19]) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DWDIZ-0006if-W8 for gentoo-perl@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 12 May 2005 13:00:20 +0000 Received: from sys947.dtic.mil (sys947.dtic.mil [131.84.90.47]) by mails.dtic.mil (8.11.7p1+Sun/Oct04cac) with ESMTP id j4CD0K711897 for ; Thu, 12 May 2005 09:00:20 -0400 (EDT) From: Michael Cummings To: gentoo-perl@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-perl] perl gentoolkit ? Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 09:00:19 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-perl@gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-perl@gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1494686.lJNPugTe3y"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200505120900.20103.mcummings@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: e612f136-0f06-4a2d-a4b9-1d4e6d4f7aaf X-Archives-Hash: 1cbe23032dce77d0e9320b5f2f45ff1f --nextPart1494686.lJNPugTe3y Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Still a good idea - was more on the horizon type idea (not this week). But= =20 your right, changing now is better than later :) While we're at changing though - do we want to consider a different dir=20 structure? Like a bin/ man/ lib? set of dirs to store in? How does svn hand= le=20 branching? (or do we even need to worry about branching?) I only ask becaus= e=20 the tarball I push up when this is in portage has a bin/ and man/ (well, yo= u=20 know, for the script and the man page...duh...sorry...) and I wasn't sure i= f=20 there was anything like that we should be doing on the back end (not burnin= g=20 on this one - i'm easy either way, just thought I'd throw it out there if=20 dirs were going to get moved around anyway). On Thursday 12 May 2005 08:14 am, antoine.raillon@mpsa.com wrote: > dunno if this idea is still around, is it ? > > in case it is, we could use the same SVN as now, but then the 'gcpan' name > would be obsolete. changing it now would be easy, while waiting will give > more work ;p > > change / not change ? > > speak now or never ;) > > -- > cab =2D-=20 =2D----o()o--------------------------------------------- Michael Cummings | #gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl Gentoo Perl Dev | on irc.freenode.net=20 =2D----o()o--------------------------------------------- --nextPart1494686.lJNPugTe3y Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCg1Nkq1ztTp5/Ti4RAgqrAJwN4vCUXHCobs3qCeuaRkYBsvUAMACgrRA+ rBwJxNMfPv0l2xIE7mf/sL0= =i1kk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1494686.lJNPugTe3y-- -- gentoo-perl@gentoo.org mailing list