From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62)
(envelope-from <gentoo-perl+bounces-474-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
id 1GvZl6-0003HI-D6
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 13:39:24 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id kBGDdAnr012915;
Sat, 16 Dec 2006 13:39:10 GMT
Received: from centrmmtao01.cox.net (centrmmtao01.cox.net [70.168.83.83])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kBGDd9RP019510
for <gentoo-perl@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 13:39:09 GMT
Received: from eastrmimpo01.cox.net ([68.1.16.119]) by centrmmtao01.cox.net
(InterMail vM.6.01.06.03 201-2131-130-104-20060516) with ESMTP
id <20061216133908.SERX23868.centrmmtao01.cox.net@eastrmimpo01.cox.net>
for <gentoo-perl@lists.gentoo.org>;
Sat, 16 Dec 2006 08:39:08 -0500
Received: from torchwood.datanode.net ([68.110.242.20])
by eastrmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp
id zRe41V00T0T704L0000000; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 08:38:04 -0500
Received: from [172.16.1.102] (dhcp-2.datanode.net [172.16.1.102])
by torchwood.datanode.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56E36A0036
for <gentoo-perl@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 16 Dec 2006 08:39:08 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: [gentoo-perl] why different ebuilds for perl and libperl?
From: Michael Cummings <mcummings@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-perl@lists.gentoo.org
In-Reply-To: <4582B270.6090004@dragou.net>
References: <4580483C.6060801@vkonovalov.ru>
<200612150808.59141.ian@gentoo.org>
<1166188291.24991.0.camel@sys947.dtic.mil> <4582B270.6090004@dragou.net>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-RvbMHJwVrUjRwlQoJnR0"
Organization: Gentoo
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 08:39:07 -0500
Message-Id: <1166276348.32064.6.camel@lotus.datanode.net>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-perl@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-perl+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-perl+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-perl+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-perl.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-perl@gentoo.org
Reply-To: gentoo-perl@gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.2.1
X-Archives-Salt: 2cda4ad4-f56c-4ced-a5e9-99247b4f7dca
X-Archives-Hash: 4fd51fae5a963c8f251f7ab33bfd5972
--=-RvbMHJwVrUjRwlQoJnR0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, 2006-12-15 at 15:34 +0100, Antoine Raillon wrote:
> Couldn"t this case be solved by a local perl-[static|dynamic] USE, with=20
> dynamic behaviour as default, while the rest of the world debates over=20
> the use of static USE and other "rules" ? ;p
>=20
http://tinyurl.com/vdzu8
Read the whole thread. Perl falls under the building both static and
dynamic libraries.
~mcummings
--=20
-----o()o----------------------------------------------
Michael Cummings | #gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl
Gentoo Perl Dev | on irc.freenode.net=20
Gentoo/SPARC
Gentoo/AMD64
GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7 8323 AB5C ED4E 9E7F 4E2E
-----o()o----------------------------------------------
Hi, I'm a .signature virus! Please copy me in your ~/.signature.
--=-RvbMHJwVrUjRwlQoJnR0
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBFg/b7q1ztTp5/Ti4RAlRJAJ9tWk3Xpg8TaZG+BVTPrPTUPmCLOACfbVVE
ocft44CliVpwjDTjuhCBp14=
=zd+a
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-RvbMHJwVrUjRwlQoJnR0--
--
gentoo-perl@gentoo.org mailing list