From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FVb1q-0004lF-UB for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 17 Apr 2006 21:13:03 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.5) with SMTP id k3HLDelm031315; Mon, 17 Apr 2006 21:13:40 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k3HLDeHF012723 for ; Mon, 17 Apr 2006 21:13:40 GMT Received: from eastrmmtao01.cox.net ([68.230.240.38]) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FVb2R-0000lx-PX for gentoo-perl@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 17 Apr 2006 21:13:39 +0000 Received: from gnosis.datanode.net ([68.110.242.20]) by eastrmmtao01.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20060417211339.JWQJ18061.eastrmmtao01.cox.net@gnosis.datanode.net>; Mon, 17 Apr 2006 17:13:39 -0400 Received: from [172.16.1.105] (unknown [172.16.1.105]) by gnosis.datanode.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E04636; Mon, 17 Apr 2006 17:13:37 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [gentoo-perl] Another g-cpan question From: Michael Cummings To: gentoo-perl@lists.gentoo.org Cc: gentoo-perl@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <1145303672.4132.6.camel@tardis.datanode.net> References: <1145303672.4132.6.camel@tardis.datanode.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-uhWLF1rwVyHEcW30s1HN" Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 17:13:33 -0400 Message-Id: <1145308413.25288.1.camel@tardis.datanode.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-perl@gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-perl@gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 X-Archives-Salt: 9452fa64-fcc1-47d9-a3f6-76cb213bf896 X-Archives-Hash: f7112957a03cfc79f2bb637f37f4ec4a --=-uhWLF1rwVyHEcW30s1HN Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable As is often enough the case, soon as I sent this off I realized that there was really only one 'economical' solution. Sorry for the traffic folks. ~mcummings On Mon, 2006-04-17 at 15:54 -0400, Michael Cummings wrote: > That's right folks, shape the future of the next release of g-cpan! >=20 > *cough* *cough* >=20 > OK, next question I'm torn on (btw, verdict with 2 whole feedbacks was > that YAML was an acceptable dep). I'm in a position where I can tweak > some simple code based on the more comprehensive dep list and list DEPs, > or I can take some time (and time =3D=3D slightly larger memory footprint= ) > and maintain module-version in the DEP list. Thoughts? On the one hand, > g-cpan is a "for entertainment purposes only" tool, ie, the ebuilds it > generates are intended for use on your box only, not for mass > distribution to the masses (for starters, there's no such thing as QA on > what its doing - its the risk you take using something that blindly > installs cpan modules). On the other hand, the power is there to do > it...opinions? --=-uhWLF1rwVyHEcW30s1HN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBERAT9q1ztTp5/Ti4RAt/ZAKCOBhVGJ+axIlQWOUImHSbhcJjMtQCfY2Bk PU9usHZmWAsMUt9XIIe+O4U= =3u9K -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-uhWLF1rwVyHEcW30s1HN-- -- gentoo-perl@gentoo.org mailing list From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FVb1t-0008JL-1R for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 17 Apr 2006 21:13:05 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.5) with SMTP id k3HLDf1Z013780; Mon, 17 Apr 2006 21:13:41 GMT Received: from eastrmmtao01.cox.net (eastrmmtao01.cox.net [68.230.240.38]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k3HLDeDs003771 for ; Mon, 17 Apr 2006 21:13:40 GMT Received: from gnosis.datanode.net ([68.110.242.20]) by eastrmmtao01.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20060417211339.JWQJ18061.eastrmmtao01.cox.net@gnosis.datanode.net>; Mon, 17 Apr 2006 17:13:39 -0400 Received: from [172.16.1.105] (unknown [172.16.1.105]) by gnosis.datanode.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E04636; Mon, 17 Apr 2006 17:13:37 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [gentoo-perl] Another g-cpan question From: Michael Cummings To: gentoo-perl@gentoo.org Cc: gentoo-perl@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <1145303672.4132.6.camel@tardis.datanode.net> References: <1145303672.4132.6.camel@tardis.datanode.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-uhWLF1rwVyHEcW30s1HN" Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 17:13:33 -0400 Message-ID: <1145308413.25288.1.camel@tardis.datanode.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-perl@gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-perl@gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 X-Archives-Salt: 71531900-91e4-4dc7-9d3e-c7567d226d63 X-Archives-Hash: 8adec1219271f9661f6c6cd95ecba537 Message-ID: <20060417211333.xn9p5S0bzRZ7brnhq0I1xGDVnpedWUS2wwtuksWI3aU@z> --=-uhWLF1rwVyHEcW30s1HN Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable As is often enough the case, soon as I sent this off I realized that there was really only one 'economical' solution. Sorry for the traffic folks. ~mcummings On Mon, 2006-04-17 at 15:54 -0400, Michael Cummings wrote: > That's right folks, shape the future of the next release of g-cpan! >=20 > *cough* *cough* >=20 > OK, next question I'm torn on (btw, verdict with 2 whole feedbacks was > that YAML was an acceptable dep). I'm in a position where I can tweak > some simple code based on the more comprehensive dep list and list DEPs, > or I can take some time (and time =3D=3D slightly larger memory footprint= ) > and maintain module-version in the DEP list. Thoughts? On the one hand, > g-cpan is a "for entertainment purposes only" tool, ie, the ebuilds it > generates are intended for use on your box only, not for mass > distribution to the masses (for starters, there's no such thing as QA on > what its doing - its the risk you take using something that blindly > installs cpan modules). On the other hand, the power is there to do > it...opinions? --=-uhWLF1rwVyHEcW30s1HN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBERAT9q1ztTp5/Ti4RAt/ZAKCOBhVGJ+axIlQWOUImHSbhcJjMtQCfY2Bk PU9usHZmWAsMUt9XIIe+O4U= =3u9K -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-uhWLF1rwVyHEcW30s1HN-- -- gentoo-perl@gentoo.org mailing list