From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12337 invoked from network); 11 Oct 2004 12:44:45 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 11 Oct 2004 12:44:45 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1CGzXh-0003Oh-8l for arch-gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 12:44:45 +0000 Received: (qmail 11636 invoked by uid 89); 11 Oct 2004 12:44:41 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-performance-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail Reply-To: gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-performance@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 13958 invoked from network); 11 Oct 2004 12:44:41 +0000 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 08:44:40 -0400 From: Thomas Lasswell Reply-To: Thomas Lasswell To: gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org, Roman Gaufman In-Reply-To: <921ad39e04101105435bcc0e0b@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <921ad39e041009110323a7c7b5@mail.gmail.com> <921ad39e04101102491cfa4c9a@mail.gmail.com> <59351.81.93.10.44.1097489201.squirrel@81.93.10.44> <200410111248.00412.tarax@arkitekts.org> <921ad39e041011052270094b3e@mail.gmail.com> <416A7E21.70305@joelmerrick.com> <921ad39e04101105435bcc0e0b@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [gentoo-performance] Gentoo-performance forum? X-Archives-Salt: bcb7625b-0056-4631-9252-6c4130fe2506 X-Archives-Hash: 015fe5ec97e1edbb2d39cf1c668f99e1 This sounds like a great idea, there's always things people contribute performance wise, and there's a ton of information on tweaks that people like to implement, although there's no real place to post them. As Joel said, a performance database would be good also, there is already a project I believe for compile times, a good performance database would be a good idea, however there would have to be made a benchmarking tool, and other things that would have to be standardized for that to work. A forum would be an easy solution for performance modifications and tweaks, and would be a great addition. --Tom On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 12:43:17 +0000, Roman Gaufman wrote: > On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 13:35:45 +0100, Joel Merrick wrote: > > Rather than a forum, wouldn't it be better to implement an acutal > > performance DB? > > > What? > > > b.t.w... it might have been knocked off the thread, but where's the > > entry for actual hardware specifics? Arch, CPU, RAM etc.. > > Hardware specific issues go to kernel/hardware, hardware specific > *performance* issues would go to the performance forum. Where's the > mistery? > > > > -- > gentoo-performance@gentoo.org mailing list > > -- Thomas Lasswell http://www.graphinesystems.com tom@graphinesystems.com lasswellt@gmail.com -- gentoo-performance@gentoo.org mailing list