From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-performance-return-14369-arch-gentoo-performance=gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: (qmail 12337 invoked from network); 11 Oct 2004 12:44:45 +0000
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197)
  by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 11 Oct 2004 12:44:45 +0000
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org)
	by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.41)
	id 1CGzXh-0003Oh-8l
	for arch-gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 12:44:45 +0000
Received: (qmail 11636 invoked by uid 89); 11 Oct 2004 12:44:41 +0000
Mailing-List: contact gentoo-performance-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-performance@gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-performance-help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-performance-unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-performance-subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-performance.gentoo.org>
Reply-To: gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org
X-BeenThere: gentoo-performance@gentoo.org
Received: (qmail 13958 invoked from network); 11 Oct 2004 12:44:41 +0000
Message-ID: <c08c70a2041011054464e5ada1@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 08:44:40 -0400
From: Thomas Lasswell <lasswellt@gmail.com>
Reply-To: Thomas Lasswell <lasswellt@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org, Roman Gaufman <hackeron@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <921ad39e04101105435bcc0e0b@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <921ad39e041009110323a7c7b5@mail.gmail.com>
	 <921ad39e04101102491cfa4c9a@mail.gmail.com>
	 <59351.81.93.10.44.1097489201.squirrel@81.93.10.44>
	 <200410111248.00412.tarax@arkitekts.org>
	 <921ad39e041011052270094b3e@mail.gmail.com>
	 <416A7E21.70305@joelmerrick.com>
	 <921ad39e04101105435bcc0e0b@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-performance] Gentoo-performance forum?
X-Archives-Salt: bcb7625b-0056-4631-9252-6c4130fe2506
X-Archives-Hash: 015fe5ec97e1edbb2d39cf1c668f99e1

This sounds like a great idea, there's always things people contribute
performance wise, and there's a ton of information on tweaks that
people like to implement, although there's no real place to post them.

As Joel said, a performance database would be good also, there is
already a project I believe for compile times, a good performance
database would be a good idea, however there would have to be made a
benchmarking tool, and other things that would have to be standardized
for that to work.

A forum would be an easy solution for performance modifications and
tweaks, and would be a great addition.

--Tom


On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 12:43:17 +0000, Roman Gaufman <hackeron@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 13:35:45 +0100, Joel Merrick <joel@joelmerrick.com> wrote:
> > Rather than a forum, wouldn't it be better to implement an acutal
> > performance DB?
> > 
> What?
> 
> > b.t.w... it might have been knocked off the thread, but where's the
> > entry for actual hardware specifics? Arch, CPU, RAM etc..
> 
> Hardware specific issues go to kernel/hardware, hardware specific
> *performance* issues would go to the performance forum. Where's the
> mistery?
> 
> 
> 
> --
> gentoo-performance@gentoo.org mailing list
> 
> 


-- 
Thomas Lasswell
http://www.graphinesystems.com
tom@graphinesystems.com
lasswellt@gmail.com

--
gentoo-performance@gentoo.org mailing list