From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-performance-return-14373-arch-gentoo-performance=gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: (qmail 11248 invoked from network); 11 Oct 2004 16:31:24 +0000
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197)
  by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 11 Oct 2004 16:31:24 +0000
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org)
	by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.41)
	id 1CH352-0003W0-F0
	for arch-gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 16:31:24 +0000
Received: (qmail 21130 invoked by uid 89); 11 Oct 2004 16:31:20 +0000
Mailing-List: contact gentoo-performance-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-performance@gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-performance-help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-performance-unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-performance-subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-performance.gentoo.org>
Reply-To: gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org
X-BeenThere: gentoo-performance@gentoo.org
Received: (qmail 5760 invoked from network); 11 Oct 2004 16:31:20 +0000
Message-ID: <921ad39e041011093140613dfe@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 16:31:19 +0000
From: Roman Gaufman <hackeron@gmail.com>
Reply-To: Roman Gaufman <hackeron@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org
In-Reply-To: <416AAB04.3060807@gentoo.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <921ad39e041009110323a7c7b5@mail.gmail.com>
	 <416AAB04.3060807@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-performance] Gentoo-performance forum?
X-Archives-Salt: 9cb44839-c748-4fb4-8f5e-d641a7c014f8
X-Archives-Hash: 7e4152fb27554580c02c7b0f4f6c9186

Games & Players is a task/purpose? --- to me its a topic, just like
performance is, or atleast is as much of a task/purpose as anything
is. I dont see how consistency is any reason not to add this forum,
thats quite an absurd reason to say the least.

If its too much of a problem, sure, then wait for the newer phpBB, if
there is any reason not to add the forum after that, like most
developers think its a bad idea, maybe run a poll in that case. It
doesnt hurt anyone, and there would certainly be a use for it.

On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 10:47:16 -0500, Lance Albertson <ramereth@gentoo.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> Roman Gaufman wrote:
> 
> > I think it would be a good idea to have a gentoo-performance forum
> > section, so performance related threads wont have to go to "Other
> > Things Gentoo". Your thoughts?
> 
> I just chatted with one of the forums admins and he said that we won't be adding
> any new forums until phpBB 2.2 is released. Thats mainly because managing with
> the current version is a major PITA from what I hear. *BUT* That doesn't mean
> that you'll see this forum created. The forums are currently structured more in
> a "task/purpose than by goal" way. So, having a goal of performance wouldn't
> really fit the structure we have right now.
> 
> --
> Lance Albertson <ramereth@gentoo.org>
> Gentoo Infrastructure
> 
> ---
> Public GPG key:  <http://www.ramereth.net/lance.asc>
> Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1  4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742
> 
> ramereth/irc.freenode.net
> 
> 
>

--
gentoo-performance@gentoo.org mailing list