public inbox for gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roman Gaufman <hackeron@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-performance] Gentoo-performance forum?
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 16:31:19 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <921ad39e041011093140613dfe@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <416AAB04.3060807@gentoo.org>

Games & Players is a task/purpose? --- to me its a topic, just like
performance is, or atleast is as much of a task/purpose as anything
is. I dont see how consistency is any reason not to add this forum,
thats quite an absurd reason to say the least.

If its too much of a problem, sure, then wait for the newer phpBB, if
there is any reason not to add the forum after that, like most
developers think its a bad idea, maybe run a poll in that case. It
doesnt hurt anyone, and there would certainly be a use for it.

On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 10:47:16 -0500, Lance Albertson <ramereth@gentoo.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> Roman Gaufman wrote:
> 
> > I think it would be a good idea to have a gentoo-performance forum
> > section, so performance related threads wont have to go to "Other
> > Things Gentoo". Your thoughts?
> 
> I just chatted with one of the forums admins and he said that we won't be adding
> any new forums until phpBB 2.2 is released. Thats mainly because managing with
> the current version is a major PITA from what I hear. *BUT* That doesn't mean
> that you'll see this forum created. The forums are currently structured more in
> a "task/purpose than by goal" way. So, having a goal of performance wouldn't
> really fit the structure we have right now.
> 
> --
> Lance Albertson <ramereth@gentoo.org>
> Gentoo Infrastructure
> 
> ---
> Public GPG key:  <http://www.ramereth.net/lance.asc>
> Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1  4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742
> 
> ramereth/irc.freenode.net
> 
> 
>

--
gentoo-performance@gentoo.org mailing list


  reply	other threads:[~2004-10-11 16:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-10-09 18:03 [gentoo-performance] Gentoo-performance forum? Roman Gaufman
2004-10-09 19:36 ` Spoiala Cristian
2004-10-11  8:36 ` M. Steffan Noé
2004-10-11  9:49   ` Roman Gaufman
2004-10-11 10:06     ` Antoine Raillon
2004-10-11 10:48       ` Tarax
2004-10-11 12:22         ` Roman Gaufman
2004-10-11 12:35           ` Joel Merrick
2004-10-11 12:43             ` Roman Gaufman
2004-10-11 12:44               ` Thomas Lasswell
2004-10-11 13:02               ` Joel Merrick
2004-10-11 13:15                 ` Roman Gaufman
2004-10-11 15:47 ` Lance Albertson
2004-10-11 16:31   ` Roman Gaufman [this message]
2004-10-12 10:39   ` Joel Merrick
2004-10-12 10:53     ` Daniel Armyr
2004-10-12 11:45       ` Joel Merrick
2004-10-12 12:47         ` Roman Gaufman
2004-10-12 13:24           ` Joel Merrick

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=921ad39e041011093140613dfe@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=hackeron@gmail.com \
    --cc=gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox