From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1Ezp9x-0006AO-BZ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 05:50:05 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k0K5mExX023421; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 05:48:14 GMT Received: from inspi.ufl.edu (inspi.ufl.edu [128.227.144.204]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k0K5mDtR029425 for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 05:48:14 GMT Received: from ip24-250-200-144.ga.at.cox.net ([24.250.200.144] helo=[192.168.1.120]) by inspi.ufl.edu with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.54) id 1EzkWI-000186-JF for gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 19:52:50 -0500 Message-ID: <43D07946.5040400@inspi.ufl.edu> Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 00:46:46 -0500 From: Michael Liesenfelt Organization: INSPI User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20060116) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-performance@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-performance] gentoo-performance References: <20060120004058.99380.qmail@web54514.mail.yahoo.com> <43D04AE6.4090002@gmail.com> <43D04B45.3030409@services-4u.net> <43D04FE1.3080703@gmail.com> <43D06992.30906@netsyncro.com> <43D07346.2040407@lunatic.net.nz> <43D0747C.7020103@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <43D0747C.7020103@gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------080703070303080804080709" X-Archives-Salt: bbb51e6c-5145-46be-86e1-ea30af34192b X-Archives-Hash: 0a9ea44a48fc02f1d464871e16a3483d This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------080703070303080804080709 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit lnxg33k wrote: > Although not exactly what you're asking, you might want to look at > RSYNC_EXCLUDEFORM. Cuts down on what is checked during rsync. I assume > that this could also cut down on the cache update time since there > would be less to check? Also cuts down on the amount of space eaten up > by portage. I'll second RSYNC exclusions. It really does speed up syncing especially on headless servers which don't need x11-*/*. -- Michael Liesenfelt University of Florida Innovative Nuclear Space Power and Propulsion Institute --------------080703070303080804080709 Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=utf-8; name="mliesenf.vcf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="mliesenf.vcf" YmVnaW46dmNhcmQNCmZuOk1pY2hhZWwgTGllc2VuZmVsdA0KbjpMaWVzZW5mZWx0O01pY2hh ZWwNCm9yZzpJbm5vdmF0aXZlIE51Y2xlYXIgU3BhY2UgUG93ZXIgYW5kIFByb3B1bHNpb24g SW5zdGl0dXRlO051Y2xlYXIgYW5kIFJhZGlvbG9naWNhbCBFbmdpbmVlcmluZw0KYWRyOlVu aXZlcnNpdHkgb2YgRmxvcmlkYTs7MjgwMCBTVyBBcmNoZXIgUmQuIEJsZGcuNTU0O0dhaW5l c3ZpbGxlO0ZMOzMyNjExLTY1MDI7VVMNCmVtYWlsO2ludGVybmV0Om1saWVzZW5mQGluc3Bp LnVmbC5lZHUNCnRpdGxlOlN0dWRlbnQNCnRlbDtjZWxsOjk1NC4zMTkuMjI3NA0KeC1tb3pp bGxhLWh0bWw6RkFMU0UNCnVybDpodHRwOi8vaW5zcGkudWZsLmVkdS9tbGllc2VuZg0KdmVy c2lvbjoyLjENCmVuZDp2Y2FyZA0KDQo= --------------080703070303080804080709-- -- gentoo-performance@gentoo.org mailing list