From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1Ezn5Y-0003Ct-AF for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 03:37:24 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k0K3WU8B014827; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 03:32:30 GMT Received: from squall.platinum-hosting.com (delphi.platinum-hosting.com [66.98.198.82]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k0K3WTdu002396 for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 03:32:30 GMT Received: from ip68-231-211-153.oc.oc.cox.net ([68.231.211.153] ident=appleboy) by squall.platinum-hosting.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.52) id 1Ezn0k-0004i9-En for gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 21:32:26 -0600 Message-ID: <43D059CC.9010002@randomvoids.com> Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 19:32:28 -0800 From: Kyle Lutze User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051022) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-performance@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-performance] gentoo-performance References: <20060120004058.99380.qmail@web54514.mail.yahoo.com> <43D04AE6.4090002@gmail.com> <43D04B45.3030409@services-4u.net> <43D04FE1.3080703@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <43D04FE1.3080703@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - squall.platinum-hosting.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lists.gentoo.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - randomvoids.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Archives-Salt: 05d1346e-24b4-41ec-b241-ac34e8181dbd X-Archives-Hash: 73a3e884032f95e6a9aa3f81c339024e lnxg33k wrote: > Chris wrote: > >> funny that a "high performance linux" has a dead performance ML... LOL > > > > Could be evidence that the "ricer" crowd doesn't read? (i.e. they post > to more generic lists or use other mediums instead of something specific > for their needs) Time to throw in a performance info post. Has anybody done any tests on the different between the one core and dual core opteron processors? I currently have an opteron 242 and a gig of ram on a tyan mobo, and I'm curious as to which would allow me to compile programs faster, as I lend the systems out to a lot of groups that have slow systems Kyle -- gentoo-performance@gentoo.org mailing list