From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4474 invoked from network); 11 Oct 2004 13:03:01 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 11 Oct 2004 13:03:01 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1CGzpM-0004tv-UR for arch-gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 13:03:00 +0000 Received: (qmail 28916 invoked by uid 89); 11 Oct 2004 13:02:57 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-performance-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail Reply-To: gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-performance@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 432 invoked from network); 11 Oct 2004 13:02:56 +0000 Message-ID: <416A847A.3050501@joelmerrick.com> Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 14:02:50 +0100 From: Joel Merrick User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20040928) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-performance@lists.gentoo.org References: <921ad39e041009110323a7c7b5@mail.gmail.com> <921ad39e04101102491cfa4c9a@mail.gmail.com> <59351.81.93.10.44.1097489201.squirrel@81.93.10.44> <200410111248.00412.tarax@arkitekts.org> <921ad39e041011052270094b3e@mail.gmail.com> <416A7E21.70305@joelmerrick.com> <921ad39e04101105435bcc0e0b@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <921ad39e04101105435bcc0e0b@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.86.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Comodo-ClamAV-Virus-Check-By: robbie.comodo.net - PASSED! X-Comodo-ClamAV-Virus-Version: clamscan / ClamAV version 0.75.1 X-Comodo-F-Prot-Virus-Check-By: robbie.comodo.net - PASSED! X-Comodo-F-Prot-Virus-Program: F-PROT ANTIVIRUS Program version: 4.4.4 Engine version: 3.14.11 Subject: Re: [gentoo-performance] Gentoo-performance forum? X-Archives-Salt: 57661c35-d10d-4a3b-a495-4c663a529c10 X-Archives-Hash: a499c09fb16bb221f1803a80ee8ce43a Roman Gaufman wrote: >On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 13:35:45 +0100, Joel Merrick wrote: > > >>Rather than a forum, wouldn't it be better to implement an acutal >>performance DB? >> >> >> >What? > > A 'proper' database that contains your hardware, architecture, optimization flags, hdparm, kernel & tuning, phase of the moon, mother's horroscope ;) You know what I mean! Not just a mish-mash of forum posts. ;) > > >>b.t.w... it might have been knocked off the thread, but where's the >>entry for actual hardware specifics? Arch, CPU, RAM etc.. >> >> > >Hardware specific issues go to kernel/hardware, hardware specific >*performance* issues would go to the performance forum. Where's the >mistery? > > > Sorry, I never took these to be 'issues', only an aid to assessing your systems performance against others... where IS the mistery? I can't find it? Re-read the original post.. 1) CFLAGS 2) LDFLAGS 3) Acovea 4) FS benchmarks 5) Raid benchmarks 6) Random performance patches like modifying /etc/init.d 7) Random sysctrl settings 8) Hdparm settings 9) Random hard drive benchmarks 10) Any other tips like nfs configuration. Err... where's the hardware? It *might* be important to know.. appologies if this was noted in a prior mail to this, but that's why I asked the question. >-- >gentoo-performance@gentoo.org mailing list > > > -- gentoo-performance@gentoo.org mailing list