* [gentoo-performance] Re: Digest of gentoo-performance@gentoo.org issue 14 (110-113)
[not found] <200705180402.l4I420Cx018492@robin.gentoo.org>
@ 2007-05-19 20:17 ` Cory Grunden
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Cory Grunden @ 2007-05-19 20:17 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-performance
> Francisco Rivas
> Linux User (New) : #448324
> Linux Machine (New) : 355187
> Am Freitag 11 Mai 2007 16:13 schrieb Cory Grunden:
> > Some things that I believe help with startup time are:
> > -Os and LDFLAGS="-Wl,-O1 -Wl,--hash-style=gnu -Wl,--as-needed"
> > In order to use the new --hash-styles, you need at least
> >
> > >=binutils-2.17.50.X, which is keyworded with -*
>
> I currently use "Wl,-O1" as it does not break too many things. I read about
> the new hash-style options, but (for me and ATM) the compromise between
> stability and speed is somewhat nearer to stable than this. Since such
> 2.17.50.* versions of binutils are still masked I assume they are
> considered
> pretty unstable.
>
> greets
> Roman
Most distributions use a cvs version of binutils and --hash-style
already, even in their stable builds.
--
gentoo-performance@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread