From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1EX1cw-0003G8-8t
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 19:16:58 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jA1JGZQ5022400;
	Tue, 1 Nov 2005 19:16:35 GMT
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.199])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jA1JGYcR026935
	for <gentoo-osx@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 19:16:34 GMT
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i12so98905wra
        for <gentoo-osx@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 11:16:33 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=GWxPoGZ50IEHnL1jVdQqggrp8S+95FsDJE0xq0y4n8tgSYMKL0yQ8fyAAHdIyHyQGCUUGnV5xwD5zzAhA7obVDiLqmH0VIlexFAORb+XDo7dbqYRj8tNU/09kck5Hk3afJm1O9joMzE5u6ni+0siN9di9tvJK3UJoH1PmDSlElA=
Received: by 10.54.157.16 with SMTP id f16mr1511060wre;
        Tue, 01 Nov 2005 11:16:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.54.108.4 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 11:16:32 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <e36b84ee0511011116q3e776e81u2b4bd066404c6990@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 11:16:32 -0800
From: m h <sesquile@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-osx@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-osx] The road ahead?
In-Reply-To: <C221C539-FF44-4C75-9946-2947996C0B61@gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-osx@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-osx+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-osx+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-osx+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-osx.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-osx@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-osx@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20051030104901.GA15227@gentoo.org>
	 <376467D8-BCFC-4A3C-9512-1AD1C32CB00B@gentoo.org>
	 <e36b84ee0510311616t14af86cdw8454632469863d0f@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20051101003258.GB10657@nightcrawler>
	 <C221C539-FF44-4C75-9946-2947996C0B61@gentoo.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by robin.gentoo.org id jA1JGYcR026935
X-Archives-Salt: 28589e83-29f4-42c2-af8e-0183fc1a63d9
X-Archives-Hash: eddd6a1959d65541eaf2adf7492a189e

On 10/31/05, Kito <kito@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> On Oct 31, 2005, at 6:32 PM, Brian Harring wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 04:16:44PM -0800, m h wrote:
> >
> > Should be usable in both cases.  Literally, the prefix stable patch is
> > chunks of my 2.1 work and haubi's work torn out and integrated into
> > 2.0
> > for prototype demonstration.
>
> Those last 2 words should be stressed... don't want anyone getting
> false ideas of whats being done here...

Well, if this is "round two" (which seems kind of weird since it's
backported from v2.1 to 2.0...).  I'm interested in tracking the
"official" version as closely as possible. Maybe I should test this
version out on FC4.  What will "round three", etc, look like (are
there missing features, is it just testing, getting ebuilds converted,
evangelism)?

Kito- Could you please elaborate on the bootstrap process?   Perhaps
we could put it in the wiki?  Regarding changes to ebuilds, yes I
agree small (or no) changes is preferred.  I went ahead and installed
apache2 in my prefixed environment and it was relatively
straightforward.

Brian-  Do you have any idea of the roadmap for prefix getting into
portage?  Would it possibly get into 2.0? 2.1? Rewrite?  What will
determine this?

matt

-- 
gentoo-osx@gentoo.org mailing list