[gentoo-osx] Attempt to use prefix on linux as secondary...

[gentoo-osx] Attempt to use prefix on linux as secondary...

[m h]

Kito/others who may be interested--

This probably belongs in alt-gentoo, but since it seems like half the
posts there are flames, I thought I'd post here.

I've attempted to use Haubi's toolbox with the tarballs (portage and
prefixed overlay) provided by Kito to install a prefix version of
portage on FC3 (fedora core 3).

I can't run the emerge command yet (not running as root), but I
thought I'd post what I've done since others might find it useful.  I
can also put this on the wiki if necessary.  It'd be nice to have
general directions on how to setup a prefixed environment that are
specific to any os (mac,linux, etc).

I'd also like feedback/suggestions.  A question I have is if it is ok
to just use the /etc directory from a stage1?  Do I need anything
else?

===========Steps for prefix================
 * download toolsbox from http://dev.gentoo.org/~ferringb/portage/prefix/haubi/
 * download portage and prefixed overlay from
http://dev.gentoo.org/~kito/distfiles/
 * cd /data1/portage/dec14/toolsbox-4-20050927
 * export PREFIX=/data1/portage/dec14/prefix
 * gmake config PREFIX=$PREFIX
DISTURL=http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/distributions/gentoo/distfiles
portage_BUILD
 *  mkdir buildroot/distfiles
 * cp ../../kito/portage-2.0.53.03.tar.gz buildroot/distfiles/
 * touch buildroot/portage/portage.fetched.done
 * change portage/portage.build
  * change line version to "VERSION=2.0.53.03"
  * toolsbox will still fail to install portage... FIXME!
 * gmake portage
 * wait for a while (3 hours...)
 * Everything but portage should build... install portage manually
  *./configure --prefix=/data1/portage/dec14/prefix/usr
--with-offset-prefix=/data1/portage/dec14/prefix --with-user=mharrison
--with-rootuser=mharrison --with-group=dev --with-wheelgroup=dev
  * make
  * make install
 * cp /etc directory from stage1 (downloaded from gentoo.org) into ${PREFIX}
  *cp ../../stage/stageUnzipped/etc -r .
 * ln -s /data1/portage/haubi/secondary-portage-snapshot-20050927/profiles/default-secondary/linux/x86
make.profile
 * copy prefix overlay into /usr/portage
  * cp -r /data1/portage/kito/prefix-overlay ${PREFIX}/usr/portage
 * edit etc/make.conf.  uncomment ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~arch"

======== end ============

At this point emerge -av system gives the following:
niger:mharrison[1052]
/data1/portage/dec14/prefix/usr/lib/portage/bin/emerge -av system

*** You are not in the portage group. You may experience cache problems
*** due to permissions preventing the creation of the on-disk cache.
*** Please add this user to the portage group if you wish to use portage.

Invalid package name in package.provided: virtual/libc
Invalid package name in package.provided: virtual/linux-sources
Invalid package name in package.provided: virtual/os-headers
!!! Problem with sandbox binary. Disabling...

--- 'profiles/arch.list' is empty or not available. Empty portage tree?
emerge: root access required.

I'll remove the check for root access (since I'm doing a prefixed
install that shouldn't matter).

Also, Haubi, if you are reading this I tried to modify toolsbox to
install the 2.0 prefix portage but I get the following:
niger:mharrison[1082] gmake portage
building portage
--prefix=/data1/portage/dec14/prefix/usr
--with-offset-prefix=/data1/portage/dec14/prefix --with-user=mharrison
--with-rootuser=mharrison --with-group=dev --with-wheelgroup=dev
checking build system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking host system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking target system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking for a BSD-compatible install...
/data1/portage/dec14/prefix/toolsbox-4-patchespre.20051214/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ginstall
-c
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking for gawk... gawk
checking whether gmake sets $(MAKE)... yes
configure: error: source directory already configured; run "make
distclean" there first
gmake: *** [/data1/portage/dec14/toolsbox-4-20050927/buildroot/portage/portage.niger.spikesource.com.builded]
Error 1

I've added the line
configureflags="${configureflags} --prefix=${PREFIX}/usr
--with-offset-prefix=${PREFIX}"
(since the 2.0 prefix version requires that) to the src_build section
of portage.build, but I don't know what else I need to do to get it to
install via toolsbox.  Apparently it installed by hand though.  Any
hints?

Hopefully this is helpful to other people who want to try prefix on
non-mac environments.

thanks

matt

-- 
gentoo-osx@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-osx] Attempt to use prefix on linux as secondary...

[Nathan]

On 12/14/05, m h <sesquile@gmail.com> wrote:
> Kito/others who may be interested--
>
> This probably belongs in alt-gentoo, but since it seems like half the
> posts there are flames, I thought I'd post here.
>
> I've attempted to use Haubi's toolbox with the tarballs (portage and
> prefixed overlay) provided by Kito to install a prefix version of
> portage on FC3 (fedora core 3).
>
> [snip]
>
> thanks
>
> matt

Love to see any progress with prefixed-installs!

~ Nathan

-- 
gentoo-osx@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-osx] Attempt to use prefix on linux as secondary...

[m h]

So I have a question:
Where can I get the ${PREFIX}/usr/local/portage/profiles directory
from to bootstrap?  Haubi and Kito both have them, but where did they
get them from?  It's not bundled with portage itself nor is it in the
stage1....

On 12/14/05, Nathan <nathan.stocks@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 12/14/05, m h <sesquile@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Kito/others who may be interested--
> >
> > This probably belongs in alt-gentoo, but since it seems like half the
> > posts there are flames, I thought I'd post here.
> >
> > I've attempted to use Haubi's toolbox with the tarballs (portage and
> > prefixed overlay) provided by Kito to install a prefix version of
> > portage on FC3 (fedora core 3).
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > thanks
> >
> > matt
>
> Love to see any progress with prefixed-installs!
>
> ~ Nathan
>
> --
> gentoo-osx@gentoo.org mailing list
>
>

-- 
gentoo-osx@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-osx] Attempt to use prefix on linux as secondary...

[m h]

Another question.  PORTDIR is not getting the prefixed value in
portage.py.  Kito, how
are you setting this?  Are you using an env variable?


On 12/14/05, m h <sesquile@gmail.com> wrote:
> So I have a question:
> Where can I get the ${PREFIX}/usr/local/portage/profiles directory
> from to bootstrap?  Haubi and Kito both have them, but where did they
> get them from?  It's not bundled with portage itself nor is it in the
> stage1....
>
> On 12/14/05, Nathan <nathan.stocks@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 12/14/05, m h <sesquile@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Kito/others who may be interested--
> > >
> > > This probably belongs in alt-gentoo, but since it seems like half the
> > > posts there are flames, I thought I'd post here.
> > >
> > > I've attempted to use Haubi's toolbox with the tarballs (portage and
> > > prefixed overlay) provided by Kito to install a prefix version of
> > > portage on FC3 (fedora core 3).
> > >
> > > [snip]
> > >
> > > thanks
> > >
> > > matt
> >
> > Love to see any progress with prefixed-installs!
> >
> > ~ Nathan
> >
> > --
> > gentoo-osx@gentoo.org mailing list
> >
> >
>

-- 
gentoo-osx@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-osx] Attempt to use prefix on linux as secondary...

[Kito]

On Dec 14, 2005, at 7:48 PM, m h wrote:

> Another question.  PORTDIR is not getting the prefixed value in
> portage.py.  Kito, how
> are you setting this?  Are you using an env variable?

What do you mean 'in portage.py' ? The constants are defined in pym/ 
portage_const.py and pym/portage_const_autotool.py (the latter being  
defined by the options originally passed to configure)

I'm setting PREFIX at the top of ${PREFIX}/etc/make.conf and setting  
everything else accordingly (my PORTDIR is a cvs checkout of the  
mainline portage tree, PORTDIR_OVERLAY is the snapshot I posted)

Right now, the defaults are all still the same as vanilla portage,  
i.e. /usr/*

Obviously hardcoding in make.conf breaks the ability to merge to  
arbitrary locations from the command line like `PREFIX=/tmp emerge -v  
boof`

>
>
> On 12/14/05, m h <sesquile@gmail.com> wrote:
>> So I have a question:
>> Where can I get the ${PREFIX}/usr/local/portage/profiles directory
>> from to bootstrap?  Haubi and Kito both have them, but where did they
>> get them from?  It's not bundled with portage itself nor is it in the
>> stage1....

The macos profile is in PORTDIR/profiles/default-darwin/macos/prefix.  
You can either put the stuff from toolsbox in your profiles  
package.provided, or make sure FEATURES="-collision-protect" and use  
the ebuilds from the prefix tree to recompile your toolchain with  
portage.

--Kito

-- 
gentoo-osx@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-osx] Attempt to use prefix on linux as secondary...

[m h]

Thanks for your response

On 12/14/05, Kito <kito@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> On Dec 14, 2005, at 7:48 PM, m h wrote:
>
> > Another question.  PORTDIR is not getting the prefixed value in
> > portage.py.  Kito, how
> > are you setting this?  Are you using an env variable?
>
> What do you mean 'in portage.py' ? The constants are defined in pym/
> portage_const.py and pym/portage_const_autotool.py (the latter being
> defined by the options originally passed to configure)
>

I meant that when emerge calls out to the statements, functions in
portage.py settings["PORTDIR"] is not returning a prefixed value....

> I'm setting PREFIX at the top of ${PREFIX}/etc/make.conf and setting
> everything else accordingly (my PORTDIR is a cvs checkout of the
> mainline portage tree, PORTDIR_OVERLAY is the snapshot I posted)
>
> Right now, the defaults are all still the same as vanilla portage,
> i.e. /usr/*

Sorry, but can you explain what you mean by "everything else" and "the
defaults" above?  I want to make sure I'm following you.

>
> Obviously hardcoding in make.conf breaks the ability to merge to
> arbitrary locations from the command line like `PREFIX=/tmp emerge -v
> boof`
>

Well, PREFIX needs to be set somewhere...

> >
> >
> > On 12/14/05, m h <sesquile@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> So I have a question:
> >> Where can I get the ${PREFIX}/usr/local/portage/profiles directory
> >> from to bootstrap?  Haubi and Kito both have them, but where did they
> >> get them from?  It's not bundled with portage itself nor is it in the
> >> stage1....
>
> The macos profile is in PORTDIR/profiles/default-darwin/macos/prefix.
> You can either put the stuff from toolsbox in your profiles
> package.provided, or make sure FEATURES="-collision-protect" and use
> the ebuilds from the prefix tree to recompile your toolchain with
> portage.
>

I'm not using macos (I'm using linux).  So if I understand you
correctly I don't need to change anything from the default linux
profile other than adding FEATURES="-collision-protect".  Cool.  My
question remains, where do I get this profile from?  (In svn)

Sorry if my questions are tedious, I'm still not comfortable with
where things are located in gentoo's svn.  So I'm trying to be very
specific here.  Hopefully this will serve others as well.

When I get something that is working, I'll create a wiki article.

Any idea when anonymous SVN will be working?

thanks for your help

matt

-- 
gentoo-osx@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-osx] Attempt to use prefix on linux as secondary...

[Kito]

On Dec 15, 2005, at 12:17 AM, m h wrote:

> Thanks for your response
>
> On 12/14/05, Kito <kito@gentoo.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Dec 14, 2005, at 7:48 PM, m h wrote:
>>
>>> Another question.  PORTDIR is not getting the prefixed value in
>>> portage.py.  Kito, how
>>> are you setting this?  Are you using an env variable?
>>
>> What do you mean 'in portage.py' ? The constants are defined in pym/
>> portage_const.py and pym/portage_const_autotool.py (the latter being
>> defined by the options originally passed to configure)
>>
>
> I meant that when emerge calls out to the statements, functions in
> portage.py settings["PORTDIR"] is not returning a prefixed value....
>
>> I'm setting PREFIX at the top of ${PREFIX}/etc/make.conf and setting
>> everything else accordingly (my PORTDIR is a cvs checkout of the
>> mainline portage tree, PORTDIR_OVERLAY is the snapshot I posted)
>>
>> Right now, the defaults are all still the same as vanilla portage,
>> i.e. /usr/*
>
> Sorry, but can you explain what you mean by "everything else" and "the
> defaults" above?  I want to make sure I'm following you.
>

Just start from the make.conf.example and read the comments, edit  
accordingly. The main ones are:
	PORTDIR=${PREFIX}/usr/portage
	DISTDIR=${PORTDIR}/distfiles
  	PKGDIR=${PORTDIR}/packages
	PORTAGE_TMPDIR=${PREFIX}/var/tmp
	PORTDIR_OVERLAY=/Volumes/Portage/trunk/prefix

> I'm not using macos (I'm using linux).  So if I understand you
> correctly I don't need to change anything from the default linux
> profile other than adding FEATURES="-collision-protect".  Cool.  My
> question remains, where do I get this profile from?  (In svn)

Its not in svn currently, so you'll need to make your own. The first  
thing would be setting up the packages file, to override some things  
in the PORTDIR/profiles/base like the kernel and system headers,  
which you won't want portage handling as your host os will provide  
those.

>
> Any idea when anonymous SVN will be working?

The portage anon repo should still be available at `svn co svn:// 
twobit.net/portage`, otherwise the 2.0.54 snapshot in my distfiles  
directory is current as of 12/14. Still waiting on daily snapshots of  
the prefix tree.

Please keep the ML and/or the wiki posted with your progress on linux  
and I'll incorporate the needed changes.

Cheers,

--Kito

-- 
gentoo-osx@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-osx] Attempt to use prefix on linux as secondary...

[Kito]

On Dec 14, 2005, at 5:21 PM, m h wrote:

> Kito/others who may be interested--
>
> This probably belongs in alt-gentoo, but since it seems like half the
> posts there are flames, I thought I'd post here.
>

Alas...

>
> I can't run the emerge command yet (not running as root),

I haven't tested this yet...what errors are you getting?

Whats in svn is working again, theres also a snapshot at http:// 
dev.gentoo.org/~kito/distfiles/portage-prefix-2.0.54.tar.bz2

Give that a shot see if you have any better luck.

> but I
> thought I'd post what I've done since others might find it useful.  I
> can also put this on the wiki if necessary.
>  It'd be nice to have
> general directions on how to setup a prefixed environment that are
> specific to any os (mac,linux, etc).

Yeah, still all on the todo list, feel free to at least copy and  
paste your notes to the wiki page.

>
> I'd also like feedback/suggestions.  A question I have is if it is ok
> to just use the /etc directory from a stage1?  Do I need anything
> else?

for now, to be compatible with ebuilds that tinker with things in  
ROOT I have been putting` [[ "${EBUILD_PHASE/install}" != "$ 
{EBUILD_PHASE}" ]] && export ROOT="${ROOT}${PREFIX}"` in ${PREFIX}/ 
etc/portage/bashrc

Thats just a hack obviously, but remember the focus here is mostly on  
the ebuilds and how to minimize the necessary modifications.

--Kito
-- 
gentoo-osx@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-osx] Attempt to use prefix on linux as secondary...

[Grobian]

Thank you very much!  I'm going to use your steps at work to see how far
I can get.  I think your problem with emerge might be that you need a
regular gentoo tree with the prefix at the moment for your profile.  But
Kito might have answered that already by now.

On 14-12-2005 15:21:41 -0800, m h wrote:
> Kito/others who may be interested--
> 
> This probably belongs in alt-gentoo, but since it seems like half the
> posts there are flames, I thought I'd post here.
*cough*
> 

-- 
Fabian Groffen
Gentoo for Mac OS X Project -- Interim Lead
-- 
gentoo-osx@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-osx] Re: Attempt to use prefix on linux as secondary...

[m h]

Thanks everyone for there responses.
I'm now re-working my effort into a script (hopefully this can be
generalized so that others can use it).

There are a few dependencies for the script:
1) Toolsbox
2) Prefixed portage
3) ebuild tree (including profile)
4) Settings (/etc files)
5) Virtual filesystem (/etc, /usr/, /var, etc that will reside under
the PREFIX directory)

I have questions with 3-5.
Kito has an ebuild tree, which I can use for 3.  But his profile is
Darwin specific.  He said I will need to make my own profile.  But
where do I get the profile to start from?  I have a gentoo
installation I can copy it from, but I'm trying to ask is where this
is stored in svn... Wait, Kito said it wasn't stored, so how is it
derived?  I'm just trying to understand the process here.

Regarding 4-5.  Is it ok to just take this from a stage1?  If so, then
this will be arch specific (which is fine, I'm just noting that).  Is
5 even necessary or will portage just add needed directories along the
way?

Will post my script later....

-- 
gentoo-osx@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-osx] Re: Attempt to use prefix on linux as secondary...

[m h]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3910 bytes --]

So after running my script to the point where the emerge command tries
to work I guess that #5 below of my dependencies (virtual filesystem)
is not required yet.

I've attached my script.  It currently has dependencies on some
directories where I store haubi's toolbox, kito's tarballs, some
modified files I have made (${MATT} directory) and a unzipped stage1
directory.  If anyone has questions fire away.

The script tries to run "emerge -av system" which currently gives the
following output:
*** You are not in the portage group. You may experience cache problems
*** due to permissions preventing the creation of the on-disk cache.
*** Please add this user to the portage group if you wish to use portage.

Invalid package name in package.provided: virtual/libc
Invalid package name in package.provided: virtual/linux-sources
Invalid package name in package.provided: virtual/os-headers
!!! Problem with sandbox binary. Disabling...

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/data1/portage/dec15/prefix/toolsbox-4-patchespre.20051215/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/emerge",
line 10, in ?
    import portage
  File "/data1/portage/dec15/prefix/toolsbox-4-patchespre.20051215/i686-pc-linux-gnu/lib/portage/pym/portage.py",
line 6856, in ?
    portdb=portdbapi(settings["PORTDIR"])
  File "/data1/portage/dec15/prefix/toolsbox-4-patchespre.20051215/i686-pc-linux-gnu/lib/portage/pym/portage.py",
line 4834, in __init__
    self.auxdb[x] = self.auxdbmodule(portage_const.DEPCACHE_PATH, x,
filtered_auxdbkeys, gid=portage_gid)
  File "/data1/portage/dec15/prefix/toolsbox-4-patchespre.20051215/i686-pc-linux-gnu/lib/portage/pym/cache/flat_hash.py",
line 22, in __init__
    self._ensure_dirs()
  File "/data1/portage/dec15/prefix/toolsbox-4-patchespre.20051215/i686-pc-linux-gnu/lib/portage/pym/cache/fs_template.py",
line 61, in _ensure_dirs
    os.chown(base, -1, self._gid)
OSError: [Errno 1] Operation not permitted:
'/data1/portage/dec15/prefix/toolsbox-4-patchespre.20051215/i686-pc-linux-gnu/var/cache/edb/dep'


###########END OUTPUT###########

There's a few issues:
1. Portage group.  Will most prefixed users have a portage group?  I'm
assumming the answer is yes.  Any debate here?

2. Invalid package name in package.provided.  I need to look into
this.  Any hints?

3. Sanbox binary.  I think portage is looking for a sandbox executable
which is missing.  Should this cause problems?

4. Python os.chown error.  I'll look into this.  Portage as of now has
a requirement to be run as root, which (I believe) Haubi removed, but
Kito hasn't.  I don't think this should be a requirement.  Debate?

I'm going to keep plowing ahead.  Will keep you guys posted of progress I make.

matt

On 12/15/05, m h <sesquile@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks everyone for there responses.
> I'm now re-working my effort into a script (hopefully this can be
> generalized so that others can use it).
>
> There are a few dependencies for the script:
> 1) Toolsbox
> 2) Prefixed portage
> 3) ebuild tree (including profile)
> 4) Settings (/etc files)
> 5) Virtual filesystem (/etc, /usr/, /var, etc that will reside under
> the PREFIX directory)
>
> I have questions with 3-5.
> Kito has an ebuild tree, which I can use for 3.  But his profile is
> Darwin specific.  He said I will need to make my own profile.  But
> where do I get the profile to start from?  I have a gentoo
> installation I can copy it from, but I'm trying to ask is where this
> is stored in svn... Wait, Kito said it wasn't stored, so how is it
> derived?  I'm just trying to understand the process here.
>
> Regarding 4-5.  Is it ok to just take this from a stage1?  If so, then
> this will be arch specific (which is fine, I'm just noting that).  Is
> 5 even necessary or will portage just add needed directories along the
> way?
>
> Will post my script later....
>

[-- Attachment #2: bootstrap.sh --]
[-- Type: application/x-sh, Size: 1793 bytes --]

[gentoo-osx] Re: Attempt to use prefix on linux as secondary...

[m h]

Got around (hacked around) python issue (I have no portage user
currently, only the group).  So in portage_data.py, I override
portage_uid to my userid
portage_uid=os.getuid()
and I'm rolling again.
Now I get the following:

Invalid package name in package.provided: virtual/libc
Invalid package name in package.provided: virtual/linux-sources
Invalid package name in package.provided: virtual/os-headers
!!! Problem with sandbox binary. Disabling...

PORTDIR /usr/portage
--- 'profiles/arch.list' is empty or not available. Empty portage tree?

These are the packages that I would merge, in order:

Calculating system dependencies
emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy ">=app-shells/bash-3.0-r9".



!!! Problem resolving dependencies for >=app-shells/bash-3.0-r9
!!! Depgraph creation failed.
=========END OUTPUT============
Note the debug statement for PORTDIR, it is not prefixed!
I have the following set in make.conf:
PORTDIR=${PREFIX}/usr/portage
Am I missing something?

I'll hack it for now (that should get rid of the arch.list error).

Hopefully people don't mind the spam.  Again, I'm not a gentoo dev, so
I'm learning about the guts of portage, hopefully this is useful (at
least as psuedo-dev notes) for someone else....

-- 
gentoo-osx@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-osx] Re: Attempt to use prefix on linux as secondary...

[m h]

Ok, I'm running into the consistancy message that Haubi mentioned. 
I've prefix set to
/data1/portage/dec15/prefix
but the toolsbox prefix (is that the correct nomenclature?) (I'll call
it PREFIX2) is:
/data1/portage/dec15/prefix/toolsbox-4-patchespre.20051215/i686-pc-linux-gnu

I'll need to trace through to see whats happening.  My make.conf in
PREFIX2/etc is not being read even though I modify it....

I'm sure I'm forgetting something somewhere... I'll step through to
see what I find.

On 12/15/05, m h <sesquile@gmail.com> wrote:
> Got around (hacked around) python issue (I have no portage user
> currently, only the group).  So in portage_data.py, I override
> portage_uid to my userid
> portage_uid=os.getuid()
> and I'm rolling again.
> Now I get the following:
>
> Invalid package name in package.provided: virtual/libc
> Invalid package name in package.provided: virtual/linux-sources
> Invalid package name in package.provided: virtual/os-headers
> !!! Problem with sandbox binary. Disabling...
>
> PORTDIR /usr/portage
> --- 'profiles/arch.list' is empty or not available. Empty portage tree?
>
> These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
>
> Calculating system dependencies
> emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy ">=app-shells/bash-3.0-r9".
>
>
>
> !!! Problem resolving dependencies for >=app-shells/bash-3.0-r9
> !!! Depgraph creation failed.
> =========END OUTPUT============
> Note the debug statement for PORTDIR, it is not prefixed!
> I have the following set in make.conf:
> PORTDIR=${PREFIX}/usr/portage
> Am I missing something?
>
> I'll hack it for now (that should get rid of the arch.list error).
>
> Hopefully people don't mind the spam.  Again, I'm not a gentoo dev, so
> I'm learning about the guts of portage, hopefully this is useful (at
> least as psuedo-dev notes) for someone else....
>

-- 
gentoo-osx@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-osx] Re: Attempt to use prefix on linux as secondary...

[m h]

While I'm firing off questions, any hints as to why there are no
ebuilds to satisfy bash?  (I'm starting through the depgraph code, but
it is hairy and ugly....)

On 12/15/05, m h <sesquile@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok, I'm running into the consistancy message that Haubi mentioned.
> I've prefix set to
> /data1/portage/dec15/prefix
> but the toolsbox prefix (is that the correct nomenclature?) (I'll call
> it PREFIX2) is:
> /data1/portage/dec15/prefix/toolsbox-4-patchespre.20051215/i686-pc-linux-gnu
>
> I'll need to trace through to see whats happening.  My make.conf in
> PREFIX2/etc is not being read even though I modify it....
>
> I'm sure I'm forgetting something somewhere... I'll step through to
> see what I find.
>
> On 12/15/05, m h <sesquile@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Got around (hacked around) python issue (I have no portage user
> > currently, only the group).  So in portage_data.py, I override
> > portage_uid to my userid
> > portage_uid=os.getuid()
> > and I'm rolling again.
> > Now I get the following:
> >
> > Invalid package name in package.provided: virtual/libc
> > Invalid package name in package.provided: virtual/linux-sources
> > Invalid package name in package.provided: virtual/os-headers
> > !!! Problem with sandbox binary. Disabling...
> >
> > PORTDIR /usr/portage
> > --- 'profiles/arch.list' is empty or not available. Empty portage tree?
> >
> > These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
> >
> > Calculating system dependencies
> > emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy ">=app-shells/bash-3.0-r9".
> >
> >
> >
> > !!! Problem resolving dependencies for >=app-shells/bash-3.0-r9
> > !!! Depgraph creation failed.
> > =========END OUTPUT============
> > Note the debug statement for PORTDIR, it is not prefixed!
> > I have the following set in make.conf:
> > PORTDIR=${PREFIX}/usr/portage
> > Am I missing something?
> >
> > I'll hack it for now (that should get rid of the arch.list error).
> >
> > Hopefully people don't mind the spam.  Again, I'm not a gentoo dev, so
> > I'm learning about the guts of portage, hopefully this is useful (at
> > least as psuedo-dev notes) for someone else....
> >
>

-- 
gentoo-osx@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-osx] Re: Attempt to use prefix on linux as secondary...

[Brian Harring]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 792 bytes --]

On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 05:51:26PM -0800, m h wrote:
> While I'm firing off questions, any hints as to why there are no
> ebuilds to satisfy bash?  (I'm starting through the depgraph code, but
> it is hairy and ugly....)
prefix portage _only_ allows using EAPI="prefix" ebuilds right now.

Down the line, if prefix is approved/integrated, then an actual EAPI 
release will be used instead of the fake one created.

Either way, why there are no ebuilds is due to portage automatically 
filtering out all ebuilds that lack a matching EAPI.

It's a protection feature, if portage doesn't know of that EAPI level, 
it won't allow the user to use it.

Unless you're using the overlay already, in which case I question if 
portage is actually using the prefix overlay ;)
~harring

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-osx] Re: Attempt to use prefix on linux as secondary...

[m h]

Brian -
Thanks for chiming in here.  And thanks for your efforts. (I was able
to meet Seemant in India two weeks ago, and he couldn't say enough
good about you).

On 12/16/05, Brian Harring <ferringb@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 05:51:26PM -0800, m h wrote:
> > While I'm firing off questions, any hints as to why there are no
> > ebuilds to satisfy bash?  (I'm starting through the depgraph code, but
> > it is hairy and ugly....)
> prefix portage _only_ allows using EAPI="prefix" ebuilds right now.
>
> Down the line, if prefix is approved/integrated, then an actual EAPI
> release will be used instead of the fake one created.
>
> Either way, why there are no ebuilds is due to portage automatically
> filtering out all ebuilds that lack a matching EAPI.
>
> It's a protection feature, if portage doesn't know of that EAPI level,
> it won't allow the user to use it.

As far as I understand EAPI is used to define a sort of super class
(in OO terms) for an ebuild.  (Feel free to correct).
I'm using Kito's prefixed ebuilds, which have the line
EAPI="prefix"
in them.

I'm not specifying the overlay right now, but I'm sure there are other
environment errors.  I'm assumming if I deal with them, this issue
will go away.

matt

-- 
gentoo-osx@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-osx] Re: Attempt to use prefix on linux as secondary...

[Brian Harring]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 840 bytes --]

On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 04:59:15PM -0800, m h wrote:
> Ok, I'm running into the consistancy message that Haubi mentioned. 
> I've prefix set to
> /data1/portage/dec15/prefix
> but the toolsbox prefix (is that the correct nomenclature?) (I'll call
> it PREFIX2) is:
> /data1/portage/dec15/prefix/toolsbox-4-patchespre.20051215/i686-pc-linux-gnu
> 
> I'll need to trace through to see whats happening.  My make.conf in
> PREFIX2/etc is not being read even though I modify it....
Betcha it 'twasn't configured properly. :)

Snag people seem to hit; adjusting prefix for configure scripts screws 
with lib/exec/data crap, but _doesn't_ fool with configuration 
locations.  Rough configure statement that should be used
./configure --sysconfdir=${PREFIX}/etc --prefix=${PREFIX}/user \
--with-offset-prefix=${PREFIX}

~harring

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-osx] Re: Attempt to use prefix on linux as secondary...

[Brian Harring]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 291 bytes --]

Bleh... 4:30am, pardon.
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 04:26:39AM -0800, Brian Harring wrote:
> ./configure --sysconfdir=${PREFIX}/etc --prefix=${PREFIX}/user \
> --with-offset-prefix=${PREFIX}
./configure --sysconfdir=${PREFIX}/etc --prefix=${PREFIX}/usr \
--with-offset-prefix=${PREFIX}
~harring

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-osx] Re: Attempt to use prefix on linux as secondary...

[Nathan]

> Hopefully people don't mind the spam.  Again, I'm not a gentoo dev, so

Are  you kidding?  I'm loving this!

~ Nathan

-- 
gentoo-osx@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-osx] Re: Attempt to use prefix on linux as secondary...

[Grobian]

On 15-12-2005 22:19:09 -0700, Nathan wrote:
> > Hopefully people don't mind the spam.  Again, I'm not a gentoo dev, so
> 
> Are  you kidding?  I'm loving this!

/me seconds that (for now)


-- 
Fabian Groffen
Gentoo for Mac OS X Project -- Interim Lead
-- 
gentoo-osx@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-osx] Re: Attempt to use prefix on linux as secondary...

[Grobian]

On 15-12-2005 16:35:36 -0800, m h wrote:
> PORTDIR /usr/portage
> --- 'profiles/arch.list' is empty or not available. Empty portage tree?

> I'll hack it for now (that should get rid of the arch.list error).

This somehow indicates your profile isn't setup correctly.  I had that
myself too.  If you issue `emerge info` it should on the first row (not
the !!! ones) encode where it finds the profile.  For me, it turned out
I used a symlink, and it doesn't like that.  Make sure you use absolute
paths for various paths in etc/make.conf.  Please post back your emerge
info.


-- 
Fabian Groffen
Gentoo for Mac OS X Project -- Interim Lead
-- 
gentoo-osx@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-osx] Re: Attempt to use prefix on linux as secondary...

[Grobian]

I have to correct myself.  This is not the profile thing.  Though the
check can't hurt I think.

IIRC you need to have the following setup:
PORTDIR=/path/to/live/rsync/tree
PORTDIR_OVERLAY=/path/to/kitos/overlay/snapshot

The overlay doesn't have the arch.list files.  We plan on adding them +
others, so the rsync tree won't be necessary any more.


On 16-12-2005 13:13:57 +0100, Grobian wrote:
> On 15-12-2005 16:35:36 -0800, m h wrote:
> > PORTDIR /usr/portage
> > --- 'profiles/arch.list' is empty or not available. Empty portage tree?
> 
> > I'll hack it for now (that should get rid of the arch.list error).
> 
> This somehow indicates your profile isn't setup correctly.  I had that
> myself too.  If you issue `emerge info` it should on the first row (not
> the !!! ones) encode where it finds the profile.  For me, it turned out
> I used a symlink, and it doesn't like that.  Make sure you use absolute
> paths for various paths in etc/make.conf.  Please post back your emerge
> info.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Fabian Groffen
> Gentoo for Mac OS X Project -- Interim Lead
> -- 
> gentoo-osx@gentoo.org mailing list
> 

-- 
Fabian Groffen
Gentoo for Mac OS X Project -- Interim Lead
-- 
gentoo-osx@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-osx] Re: Attempt to use prefix on linux as secondary...

[m h]

Ok, I'm currently running my script again (doing sort of a daily
build) and will make sure to use PORTDIR_OVERLAY.  Will post back the
results.

On 12/16/05, Grobian <grobian@gentoo.org> wrote:
> I have to correct myself.  This is not the profile thing.  Though the
> check can't hurt I think.
>
> IIRC you need to have the following setup:
> PORTDIR=/path/to/live/rsync/tree
> PORTDIR_OVERLAY=/path/to/kitos/overlay/snapshot
>
> The overlay doesn't have the arch.list files.  We plan on adding them +
> others, so the rsync tree won't be necessary any more.
>
>
> On 16-12-2005 13:13:57 +0100, Grobian wrote:
> > On 15-12-2005 16:35:36 -0800, m h wrote:
> > > PORTDIR /usr/portage
> > > --- 'profiles/arch.list' is empty or not available. Empty portage tree?
> >
> > > I'll hack it for now (that should get rid of the arch.list error).
> >
> > This somehow indicates your profile isn't setup correctly.  I had that
> > myself too.  If you issue `emerge info` it should on the first row (not
> > the !!! ones) encode where it finds the profile.  For me, it turned out
> > I used a symlink, and it doesn't like that.  Make sure you use absolute
> > paths for various paths in etc/make.conf.  Please post back your emerge
> > info.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Fabian Groffen
> > Gentoo for Mac OS X Project -- Interim Lead
> > --
> > gentoo-osx@gentoo.org mailing list
> >
>
> --
> Fabian Groffen
> Gentoo for Mac OS X Project -- Interim Lead
> --
> gentoo-osx@gentoo.org mailing list
>
>

-- 
gentoo-osx@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-osx] Re: Attempt to use prefix on linux as secondary...

[m h]

Here's my emerge info (PORTDIR is currently hardcoded in this one....):
!!! Relying on the shell to locate gcc, this may break
!!! DISTCC, installing gcc-config and setting your current gcc
!!! profile will fix this
Portage 2.0.54 (default-secondary/linux/x86, gcc-3.3.5, unavailable, 2.6.10-1.77
0_FC3 i686)
=================================================================
System uname: 2.6.10-1.770_FC3 i686 i686
Gentoo Base System version 1.6.13
dev-lang/python:     [Not Present]
sys-apps/sandbox:    [Not Present]
sys-devel/autoconf:  [Not Present]
sys-devel/automake:  [Not Present]
sys-devel/binutils:  [Not Present]
sys-devel/libtool:   [Not Present]
sys-devel/odcctools: [Not Present]
virtual/os-headers:  [Not Present]
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86 ~x86"
AUTOCLEAN="yes"
CBUILD="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc"
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK=" /data1/portage/dec15/prefix/toolsbox-4-patchespre.20051215
/i686-pc-linux-gnu//etc/env.d"
DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles"
FEATURES="autoconfig distlocks sfperms strict"
GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://distfiles.gentoo.org http://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/linux/
distributions/gentoo"
LANG="en_US"
PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages"
PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp"
PORTDIR="/data1/portage/dec15/prefix/toolsbox-4-patchespre.20051215/i686-pc-linu
x-gnu/portage"
PREFIX="/data1/portage/dec15/prefix"
SYNC="rsync://rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage"
USE="x86 secondary elibc_glibc kernel_linux userland_GNU"
Unset:  ASFLAGS, CFLAGS, CTARGET, CXXFLAGS, LC_ALL, LDFLAGS, LINGUAS, MAKEOPTS,
PORTDIR_OVERLAY




On 12/16/05, Grobian <grobian@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 15-12-2005 16:35:36 -0800, m h wrote:
> > PORTDIR /usr/portage
> > --- 'profiles/arch.list' is empty or not available. Empty portage tree?
>
> > I'll hack it for now (that should get rid of the arch.list error).
>
> This somehow indicates your profile isn't setup correctly.  I had that
> myself too.  If you issue `emerge info` it should on the first row (not
> the !!! ones) encode where it finds the profile.  For me, it turned out
> I used a symlink, and it doesn't like that.  Make sure you use absolute
> paths for various paths in etc/make.conf.  Please post back your emerge
> info.
>
>
> --
> Fabian Groffen
> Gentoo for Mac OS X Project -- Interim Lead
> --
> gentoo-osx@gentoo.org mailing list
>
>

-- 
gentoo-osx@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-osx] Re: Attempt to use prefix on linux as secondary...

[Brian Harring]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 557 bytes --]

On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 04:35:36PM -0800, m h wrote:
> Got around (hacked around) python issue (I have no portage user
> currently, only the group).  So in portage_data.py, I override
> portage_uid to my userid
> portage_uid=os.getuid()
> and I'm rolling again.
./configure --help | less # instead
there's configurable's for defining uid/gid.  Down the line (repeating 
myself), if this is mainlined, proper implementation will be created 
where config can define/adjust uid/gid's to use instead of current 
hardcoding at install time.
~harring

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-osx] Re: Attempt to use prefix on linux as secondary...

[m h]

On 12/16/05, Brian Harring <ferringb@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 04:35:36PM -0800, m h wrote:
> > Got around (hacked around) python issue (I have no portage user
> > currently, only the group).  So in portage_data.py, I override
> > portage_uid to my userid
> > portage_uid=os.getuid()
> > and I'm rolling again.
> ./configure --help | less # instead
> there's configurable's for defining uid/gid.  Down the line (repeating
> myself), if this is mainlined, proper implementation will be created
> where config can define/adjust uid/gid's to use instead of current
> hardcoding at install time.
> ~harring
>

it looks like Haubi's toolbox is doing the right thing here (setting
the right configure flags):
src_build() {
	echo "ENV:"
	env
	echo "MATT"
	configureflags=
	case "${PLATFORM}" in
	SunOS)
		XCU_ID=/usr/xpg4/bin/id
		;;
	*)
		XCU_ID=/usr/bin/id
		;;
	esac
	if [ -x "${DESTDIR}/bin/bash" ]
	then
		CU_BASH="${DESTDIR}/bin/bash" export CU_BASH
	fi
	configureflags="${configureflags} --with-offset-prefix=${DESTROOT}"
	configureflags="${configureflags} --prefix=${DESTROOT}/usr"
	configureflags="${configureflags} --with-user=`${XCU_ID} -un`"
	configureflags="${configureflags} --with-rootuser=`${XCU_ID} -un`"
	configureflags="${configureflags} --with-group=`${XCU_ID} -gn`"
	configureflags="${configureflags} --with-wheelgroup=`${XCU_ID} -gn`"
	gnu_build || die
}


Even if these are set, there is some hardcoded values in portage....
No biggie.  Just need to edit them...

>
>

-- 
gentoo-osx@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-osx] Re: Attempt to use prefix on linux as secondary...

[m h]

The easiest way around this is to add
secpass=2
to the bottom of portage_data.py
Note that the comment in portage_data.py reading:
#Secpass will be set to 1 if the user is root or in the portage group.
is erroneous.  It should say set to 2...

On 12/16/05, m h <sesquile@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 12/16/05, Brian Harring <ferringb@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 04:35:36PM -0800, m h wrote:
> > > Got around (hacked around) python issue (I have no portage user
> > > currently, only the group).  So in portage_data.py, I override
> > > portage_uid to my userid
> > > portage_uid=os.getuid()
> > > and I'm rolling again.
> > ./configure --help | less # instead
> > there's configurable's for defining uid/gid.  Down the line (repeating
> > myself), if this is mainlined, proper implementation will be created
> > where config can define/adjust uid/gid's to use instead of current
> > hardcoding at install time.
> > ~harring
> >
>
> it looks like Haubi's toolbox is doing the right thing here (setting
> the right configure flags):
> src_build() {
>         echo "ENV:"
>         env
>         echo "MATT"
>         configureflags=
>         case "${PLATFORM}" in
>         SunOS)
>                 XCU_ID=/usr/xpg4/bin/id
>                 ;;
>         *)
>                 XCU_ID=/usr/bin/id
>                 ;;
>         esac
>         if [ -x "${DESTDIR}/bin/bash" ]
>         then
>                 CU_BASH="${DESTDIR}/bin/bash" export CU_BASH
>         fi
>         configureflags="${configureflags} --with-offset-prefix=${DESTROOT}"
>         configureflags="${configureflags} --prefix=${DESTROOT}/usr"
>         configureflags="${configureflags} --with-user=`${XCU_ID} -un`"
>         configureflags="${configureflags} --with-rootuser=`${XCU_ID} -un`"
>         configureflags="${configureflags} --with-group=`${XCU_ID} -gn`"
>         configureflags="${configureflags} --with-wheelgroup=`${XCU_ID} -gn`"
>         gnu_build || die
> }
>
>
> Even if these are set, there is some hardcoded values in portage....
> No biggie.  Just need to edit them...
>
> >
> >
>

-- 
gentoo-osx@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-osx] Attempt to use prefix on linux as secondary...

[Grobian]

Ok, I decided to to something completely different today, and went on
trying to get this working.  First I tried to follow your steps:

On 14-12-2005 15:21:41 -0800, m h wrote:
> ===========Steps for prefix================
>  * download toolsbox from http://dev.gentoo.org/~ferringb/portage/prefix/haubi/
>  * download portage and prefixed overlay from
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~kito/distfiles/
>  * cd /data1/portage/dec14/toolsbox-4-20050927
>  * export PREFIX=/data1/portage/dec14/prefix
>  * gmake config PREFIX=$PREFIX
> DISTURL=http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/distributions/gentoo/distfiles
> portage_BUILD

What is this portage_BUILD?  gmake doesn't like it as target.

>  *  mkdir buildroot/distfiles
>  * cp ../../kito/portage-2.0.53.03.tar.gz buildroot/distfiles/

I took kito's prefixed version instead.  Because it's not what the
scripts expect, I did some fooling around:

% tar -jxf portage-prefix-2.0.54.tar.bz2
% mv portage-prefix-2.0.54 portage-2.0.54
% tar -gcf portage-2.0.54.tar.gz portage-2.0.54

>  * touch buildroot/portage/portage.fetched.done
>  * change portage/portage.build
>   * change line version to "VERSION=2.0.53.03"

I set the version to 2.0.54, at least the unpack phase went fine in
gmake portage.

>   * toolsbox will still fail to install portage... FIXME!
>  * gmake portage
>  * wait for a while (3 hours...)

hmmm...  Could have known, some of the packages don't compile out of the
box, because my FC4 system uses gcc4.
So I replaced binutils (which bugged) with a never version.  Easy, just
change binutils/binutils.build and change to the never version.

However, after that worked, python didn't want to install, because the
linker could not find gcc_s or something.  Ok, so I gave up, wondering
why I'd need all those tools anyway, and see how hard I would fall, if I
would just configure and install kito's portage tar.

So I unpacked it, ran configure like this: (where $(prefix) is here for
making it generic, and killing lots of long paths)
configure \
--sysconfdir=$(prefix)/etc \
--prefix=$(prefix)/usr \
--with-offset-prefix=$(prefix) \
--with-user=fabian \
--with-group=ins \
--with-wheelgroup=ins1 \
--with-rootuser=fabian \

configure, make, make install went all fine, so in my $(prefix), I added
an /usr/portage (rsync tree), including distfiles (for fun, from another
machine) and a usr/local/portage which contained the prefix overlay
files from kito.

portage is enormously picky, and creating the make.profile symlink gave
me some problems.  Making it a relative link, e.g.
../usr/portage/profiles... portage assumed the .. was bogus, and thought
that the profiles was at /usr/portage/profiles... where it of course
wasn't.  Solution: use an absolute symlink there.

Next stop was emerge dying with some vague permission denied message.
Iteratively executing emerge made it work in the end, because it
appeared to be creating the /var/cache/... tree, and died each time when
a directory didn't exist.  So after each run of emerge, my directory
tree there was one level deeper, hence after a lot of runs, emerge
finally exited cleanly, leaving me with some messages:

> (pegasus:~/scratch/programs/gentoo) fabian% usr/bin/emerge info
> portage: 'portage' user or group missing. Please update baselayout
>          and merge portage user(250) and group(250) into your passwd
>          and group files. Non-root compilation is disabled until then.
>          Also note that non-root/wheel users will need to be added to
>          the portage group to do portage commands.
> 
>          For the defaults, line 1 goes into passwd, and 2 into group.
>          portage:x:250:250:portage:/var/tmp/portage:/bin/false
>          portage::250:portage

Ok, I had hoped these numbers would have been set to my user and group
IDs by the configure call.  Apparently not.  Or it is something else I
did wrong here.  There's no way for me on this system to create or
modify users.

> *** You are not in the portage group. You may experience cache problems
> *** due to permissions preventing the creation of the on-disk cache.
> *** Please add this user to the portage group if you wish to use portage.

Hmmm... ok.

> !!! Problem with sandbox binary. Disabling...

Right.  It probably doesn't exist.

> !!! Relying on the shell to locate gcc, this may break
> !!! DISTCC, installing gcc-config and setting your current gcc
> !!! profile will fix this
> Portage 2.0.54 (default-linux/amd64/2006.0, gcc-4.0.2, unavailable, 2.6.13-1.1526_FC4 x86_64)
> =================================================================
> System uname: 2.6.13-1.1526_FC4 x86_64 x86_64
> Unknown Host Operating System
> distcc 2.18.3 x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu (protocols 1 and 2) (default port 3632) [disabled]
> ccache version 2.4 [disabled]
> dev-lang/python:     [Not Present]
> sys-apps/sandbox:    [Not Present]
> sys-devel/autoconf:  [Not Present]
> sys-devel/automake:  [Not Present]
> sys-devel/binutils:  [Not Present]
> sys-devel/libtool:   [Not Present]
> sys-devel/odcctools: [Not Present]
> virtual/os-headers:  [Not Present]
> ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="amd64 x86"
> CBUILD="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
> CFLAGS="-O2 -pipe"
> CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
> CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/kde/2/share/config /usr/kde/3/share/config /usr/share/config /var/qmail/control"
[snip]

I probably should go and look for some documentation on this...


-- 
Fabian Groffen
Gentoo for Mac OS X Project -- Interim Lead
-- 
gentoo-osx@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-osx] Attempt to use prefix on linux as secondary...

[Grobian]

On 17-12-2005 14:49:40 +0100, Grobian wrote:
> > (pegasus:~/scratch/programs/gentoo) fabian% usr/bin/emerge info
> > portage: 'portage' user or group missing. Please update baselayout
> >          and merge portage user(250) and group(250) into your passwd
> >          and group files. Non-root compilation is disabled until then.
> >          Also note that non-root/wheel users will need to be added to
> >          the portage group to do portage commands.
> > 
> >          For the defaults, line 1 goes into passwd, and 2 into group.
> >          portage:x:250:250:portage:/var/tmp/portage:/bin/false
> >          portage::250:portage
> 
> Ok, I had hoped these numbers would have been set to my user and group
> IDs by the configure call.  Apparently not.  Or it is something else I
> did wrong here.  There's no way for me on this system to create or
> modify users.

Update:
I 'fixed' this by changing portage_data.py.  Instead of the hardcoded
wheel user and group, I just substituted them with my own names.  So far
so good.  Now what's left is to start adding packages to the overlay
tree with EAPI="prefix", I suppose.
-- 
gentoo-osx@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-osx] Attempt to use prefix on linux as secondary...

[m h]

Doesn't Kito's ebuild's already have EAPI?  Or do you want different packages?

On 12/17/05, Grobian <grobian@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 17-12-2005 14:49:40 +0100, Grobian wrote:
> > > (pegasus:~/scratch/programs/gentoo) fabian% usr/bin/emerge info
> > > portage: 'portage' user or group missing. Please update baselayout
> > >          and merge portage user(250) and group(250) into your passwd
> > >          and group files. Non-root compilation is disabled until then.
> > >          Also note that non-root/wheel users will need to be added to
> > >          the portage group to do portage commands.
> > >
> > >          For the defaults, line 1 goes into passwd, and 2 into group.
> > >          portage:x:250:250:portage:/var/tmp/portage:/bin/false
> > >          portage::250:portage
> >
> > Ok, I had hoped these numbers would have been set to my user and group
> > IDs by the configure call.  Apparently not.  Or it is something else I
> > did wrong here.  There's no way for me on this system to create or
> > modify users.
>
> Update:
> I 'fixed' this by changing portage_data.py.  Instead of the hardcoded
> wheel user and group, I just substituted them with my own names.  So far
> so good.  Now what's left is to start adding packages to the overlay
> tree with EAPI="prefix", I suppose.
> --
> gentoo-osx@gentoo.org mailing list
>
>

-- 
gentoo-osx@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-osx] Attempt to use prefix on linux as secondary...

[m h]

This is great thanks!

On 12/17/05, Grobian <grobian@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Ok, I decided to to something completely different today, and went on
> trying to get this working.  First I tried to follow your steps:
>
> On 14-12-2005 15:21:41 -0800, m h wrote:
> > ===========Steps for prefix================
> >  * download toolsbox from http://dev.gentoo.org/~ferringb/portage/prefix/haubi/
> >  * download portage and prefixed overlay from
> > http://dev.gentoo.org/~kito/distfiles/
> >  * cd /data1/portage/dec14/toolsbox-4-20050927
> >  * export PREFIX=/data1/portage/dec14/prefix
> >  * gmake config PREFIX=$PREFIX
> > DISTURL=http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/distributions/gentoo/distfiles
> > portage_BUILD
>
> What is this portage_BUILD?  gmake doesn't like it as target.

Sorry, you should have probably gone from my script, but portage_BUILD
is part of toolsbox... at least for me.

>
> >  *  mkdir buildroot/distfiles
> >  * cp ../../kito/portage-2.0.53.03.tar.gz buildroot/distfiles/
>
> I took kito's prefixed version instead.  Because it's not what the
> scripts expect, I did some fooling around:
>
> % tar -jxf portage-prefix-2.0.54.tar.bz2
> % mv portage-prefix-2.0.54 portage-2.0.54
> % tar -gcf portage-2.0.54.tar.gz portage-2.0.54

Yep, I also had to do this...

>
> >  * touch buildroot/portage/portage.fetched.done
> >  * change portage/portage.build
> >   * change line version to "VERSION=2.0.53.03"
>
> I set the version to 2.0.54, at least the unpack phase went fine in
> gmake portage.
>
> >   * toolsbox will still fail to install portage... FIXME!
> >  * gmake portage
> >  * wait for a while (3 hours...)
>
> hmmm...  Could have known, some of the packages don't compile out of the
> box, because my FC4 system uses gcc4.
> So I replaced binutils (which bugged) with a never version.  Easy, just
> change binutils/binutils.build and change to the never version.

When I was using using FC4 a month or two ago I also had to do this. 
This time I've been working on FC3....

>
> However, after that worked, python didn't want to install, because the
> linker could not find gcc_s or something.  Ok, so I gave up, wondering
> why I'd need all those tools anyway, and see how hard I would fall, if I
> would just configure and install kito's portage tar.

Sounds reasonable, I can try this route as well, though it seems like
I was a little more successful using toolsbox.  This certainly is
easier and since you should be able to get the deps for portage
installed easily on most machines maybe it is the way to go.  I know
that others have had success using toolsbox on AIX....

>
> So I unpacked it, ran configure like this: (where $(prefix) is here for
> making it generic, and killing lots of long paths)
> configure \
> --sysconfdir=$(prefix)/etc \
> --prefix=$(prefix)/usr \
> --with-offset-prefix=$(prefix) \
> --with-user=fabian \
> --with-group=ins \
> --with-wheelgroup=ins1 \
> --with-rootuser=fabian \
>
> configure, make, make install went all fine, so in my $(prefix), I added
> an /usr/portage (rsync tree), including distfiles (for fun, from another
> machine) and a usr/local/portage which contained the prefix overlay
> files from kito.
>
> portage is enormously picky, and creating the make.profile symlink gave
> me some problems.  Making it a relative link, e.g.
> ../usr/portage/profiles... portage assumed the .. was bogus, and thought
> that the profiles was at /usr/portage/profiles... where it of course
> wasn't.  Solution: use an absolute symlink there.

Hmmm, I don't think I ran into this....  but I wasn't using relative
paths.  Maybe python is doing something unexpected here.  That should
be pretty easy to fix.

>
> Next stop was emerge dying with some vague permission denied message.
> Iteratively executing emerge made it work in the end, because it
> appeared to be creating the /var/cache/... tree, and died each time when
> a directory didn't exist.  So after each run of emerge, my directory
> tree there was one level deeper, hence after a lot of runs, emerge
> finally exited cleanly, leaving me with some messages:
>
> > (pegasus:~/scratch/programs/gentoo) fabian% usr/bin/emerge info
> > portage: 'portage' user or group missing. Please update baselayout
> >          and merge portage user(250) and group(250) into your passwd
> >          and group files. Non-root compilation is disabled until then.
> >          Also note that non-root/wheel users will need to be added to
> >          the portage group to do portage commands.
> >
> >          For the defaults, line 1 goes into passwd, and 2 into group.
> >          portage:x:250:250:portage:/var/tmp/portage:/bin/false
> >          portage::250:portage
>
> Ok, I had hoped these numbers would have been set to my user and group
> IDs by the configure call.  Apparently not.  Or it is something else I
> did wrong here.  There's no way for me on this system to create or
> modify users.

Yeah, I'm pretty sure I passed the right configuration flags to change
the users too.  But I still have to do the secpass=2 hack.  I know
that Haubi's 2.1 portage code handled this correctly.  There are still
issues in the 2.0 backport.

>
> > *** You are not in the portage group. You may experience cache problems
> > *** due to permissions preventing the creation of the on-disk cache.
> > *** Please add this user to the portage group if you wish to use portage.
>
> Hmmm... ok.
>
> > !!! Problem with sandbox binary. Disabling...
>
> Right.  It probably doesn't exist.

This is just a friendly warning right?  I guess sandbox would be
useful to see that everything is going in the right place though...

>
> > !!! Relying on the shell to locate gcc, this may break
> > !!! DISTCC, installing gcc-config and setting your current gcc
> > !!! profile will fix this
> > Portage 2.0.54 (default-linux/amd64/2006.0, gcc-4.0.2, unavailable, 2.6.13-1.1526_FC4 x86_64)
> > =================================================================
> > System uname: 2.6.13-1.1526_FC4 x86_64 x86_64
> > Unknown Host Operating System
> > distcc 2.18.3 x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu (protocols 1 and 2) (default port 3632) [disabled]
> > ccache version 2.4 [disabled]
> > dev-lang/python:     [Not Present]
> > sys-apps/sandbox:    [Not Present]
> > sys-devel/autoconf:  [Not Present]
> > sys-devel/automake:  [Not Present]
> > sys-devel/binutils:  [Not Present]
> > sys-devel/libtool:   [Not Present]
> > sys-devel/odcctools: [Not Present]
> > virtual/os-headers:  [Not Present]
> > ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="amd64 x86"
> > CBUILD="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
> > CFLAGS="-O2 -pipe"
> > CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
> > CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/kde/2/share/config /usr/kde/3/share/config /usr/share/config /var/qmail/control"
> [snip]
>
> I probably should go and look for some documentation on this...
>

So when you try "emerge -av system" what happens?
Do dependencies get worked out?  Do they build?

-- 
gentoo-osx@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-osx] Attempt to use prefix on linux as secondary...

[Grobian]

On 17-12-2005 08:48:49 -0800, m h wrote:
> So when you try "emerge -av system" what happens?
> Do dependencies get worked out?  Do they build?

Ehm, no.  I lost quite some hair by now.  It keeps on bugging me.  I
spoke to kito, to get some understanding on the process.  Appeared I did
some things wrong, so I'm going to restart it.  For short if I recall
correctly, Kito said this:

1. create directory where the prefix should live
2. populate the directory with stuff from profile packages file
3. configure/install portage with prefix=prefix dir
4. emerge -ev system from it


-- 
Fabian Groffen
Gentoo for Mac OS X Project -- Interim Lead
-- 
gentoo-osx@gentoo.org mailing list