From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1EXA3N-0000Xl-7n
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2005 04:16:49 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jA24GQ1e010276;
	Wed, 2 Nov 2005 04:16:26 GMT
Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.192])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jA24GPHx001234
	for <gentoo-osx@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 2 Nov 2005 04:16:26 GMT
Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i30so73001wxd
        for <gentoo-osx@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 20:16:25 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=D0kubfkb4FipVpDfK9LBU3FMCGY626YM1vT64s51/OtEEv0n/e/Y7RpKC3HBWUkuiwgNBVW/3hM1WDp1DuC4vftrXVpt0fTsW9vlnz+79fdswyWm8q0b6dnbB3zMHR/DEovFJ8EKkZYeDCe9SbGL037Gl2h8A4feeVswqNU0GWI=
Received: by 10.64.251.4 with SMTP id y4mr1631362qbh;
        Tue, 01 Nov 2005 20:16:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.65.44.18 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 20:16:25 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <96c9d6a80511012016u3b1fdf3eu29c9bbaece1d427d@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 21:16:25 -0700
From: Nathan <nathan.stocks@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-osx@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-osx] The road ahead?
In-Reply-To: <20051102023307.GC16594@nightcrawler>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-osx@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-osx+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-osx+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-osx+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-osx.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-osx@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-osx@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20051030104901.GA15227@gentoo.org>
	 <376467D8-BCFC-4A3C-9512-1AD1C32CB00B@gentoo.org>
	 <e36b84ee0510311616t14af86cdw8454632469863d0f@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20051101003258.GB10657@nightcrawler>
	 <C221C539-FF44-4C75-9946-2947996C0B61@gentoo.org>
	 <e36b84ee0511011116q3e776e81u2b4bd066404c6990@mail.gmail.com>
	 <65C7CF99-1E15-49EE-85F2-E08AC12CD177@gentoo.org>
	 <20051102023307.GC16594@nightcrawler>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by robin.gentoo.org id jA24GPHx001234
X-Archives-Salt: dd6bc445-70ba-457d-ba2e-606bc604d28e
X-Archives-Hash: b9ce7d688b33df2ca8a561dc6f16e956

On 11/1/05, Brian Harring <ferringb@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 02:10:03PM -0600, Kito wrote:
> > I'll let Brian answer this, but I'm fairly certain there is no chance
> > of this making it into the 2.0 series, 2.1 is dead, so 3.0 will have
> > to be our saviour (boooo! hsssss! bad pun)
>
> No way in hell on 2.0; 2.1 was released dead (the major changes of it
> are a year old), 3.0 would be the only _potential_ portage target.
>
> Why did I say potential?
>
> Cause I'm after making an ancillary point so everyone is on the same
> page here- portage will *not* have any prefix support without the
> ebuild changes being vetted by gentoo community.

I had to look up 'ancillary' and 'vet.'  Vocabulary++.

> What's being worked on is a prototype- the prototype will be useful on
> it's own, but the main point of it is demonstrating that it's doable
> and the pros/cons of it.
>
> Please keep this in mind.  Bit of a reality check (kito and I are
> operating under this)- comments of the sort "when portage supports
> prefix "...
>
> Portage will only mainline support PREFIX if devs agree to the underlying
> ebuild changes.  So... help make it clean, but be aware of the rules being
> operated under please.

Very good to know, especieally as I was one of those assuming it was a
"when" and not an "if."  Do the 'rules being operated under' consist
of what you mentioned above (i.e. prefixed installs are a one-off
prototype unless/until everyone accepts it), or is there more to it
than that?

-- 
gentoo-osx@gentoo.org mailing list