From: "Grobian" <grobian@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-osx@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-osx] Election Details
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 10:00:52 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48249.192.16.196.142.1124352052.squirrel@webmail.orakel.ods.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0673FEEC-7A4E-4C1C-83D0-7F880F7965A8@gentoo.org>
On Thu, August 18, 2005 00:10, Lina Pezzella wrote:
>>> Sounds like you guys are going to do this regardless, so why wait
>>> a week?
>
> We were hoping to give others a chance to announce candidacy. As per
> my discussion on IRC with kito, if Fabian doesn't object, we will be
> changing the election position to "Lead" and running as partners (co-
> leads) rather than staying with the traditional strategic/operational
> titles. We feel that the time commitment for the lead position would
> be better met as a team due to our existing school and work
> commitments. Kito suggested the name switch on the basis that the
> "strategic" lead isn't going to be dictating long-term goals with a
> project team as small as ours.
Hmmm, k. I can understand the time consumption thing. So if I understand
correctly one of you two is going to be "Lead" and the other "Co-Lead"
which is only a thing on a golden plate, but in the end results in sharing
the "Lead" work as appropriate between you two. That's ok with me.
> My impression via our IRC conversation (and kito, please please
> correct me if I'm wrong), is that kito wanted a senior gentoo
> developer to take the project lead position.
> As we currently don't
> have a senior gentoo developer with the project, he felt it would be
> better to wait for one to come along.
Hehe.... isn't kito senior enough? :) :p Compared to me almost everything
is senior. :p
> ... We need someone that's
> been with the Gentoo for Mac OS X project long enough to know the
> difficulties it faces and where it's come from.
Good point.
> As for the need for the title, it is necessary for a variety of reasons:
> 1) Recruitment - we can bring new devs on, but making staffing
> announcements has been a battle without the title. After much
> convincing with devrel, I got them to put up a one sentence staffing
> call for the project only because Pieter (pvdabeel) has been pretty
> publicly absent with regards to Gentoo for Mac OS X.
I assume this will change as soon as this thing becomes reality.
> I'll recap the most important points. Please see our original e-mail
> post for the details.
>
> 1) Recruitment/Staffing
> 2) Documenting and initiating discussion on project policy
> 3) Address PR - BugDay, Updated Documentation, Project Page
Ok.
--
gentoo-osx@gentoo.org mailing list
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-18 8:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-15 19:41 [gentoo-osx] Arch Testers, Fabian's Proposal, Election Details Hasan Khalil
2005-08-15 20:07 ` Kito
2005-08-16 16:19 ` Grobian
2005-08-17 22:10 ` Lina Pezzella
2005-08-18 8:00 ` Grobian [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48249.192.16.196.142.1124352052.squirrel@webmail.orakel.ods.org \
--to=grobian@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-osx@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox