[gentoo-osx] Ruby issue

[gentoo-osx] Ruby issue

[Grobian]

Some of you might have noticed the Ruby (security) issue.  I'd like to 
have a quick round on it.

A short situation sketch:
- ruby 1.8.2 compiles with some patches made by usata on Panther
- ruby 1.8.2 collides on Tiger with system installed ruby
- ruby 1.8.2 contains security vulnerability and stuff
- ruby 1.8.3 is safe(r)
- ruby 1.8.3 doesn't compile on Panther due to autoconf 2.59 requirement
- ruby 1.8.3 of course also collides on Tiger
- ruby 1.8.2 is marked ppc-macos stable
- ruby 1.8.3 is marked ~ppc-macos unstable

ruby is for Tiger in p.mask, since the sec. bug I added the mask in the 
Panther profile too, however, that's not really a solution, and the sec. 
guys want more action from us, basically.

I can think of three 'solutions':
1. drop ppc-macos keyword for all ruby keywords.
    This is drastical, but since ruby won't have a nice mariage with OSX
    using oldstyle Gentoo/OSX it solves the problem for good.
2. drop ppc-macos keyword in 1.8.2 and replace it with 1.8.3
    This is bad because we basically drop the keyword, but it leaves us
    with the 'desired' state of having only ~ppc-macos.
3. stable 1.8.3
    This feels bad to me, but it's what the sec. guys want to see.  It
    makes sense for progressive users (although I don't know of any real
    ones).  We would stable a package without testing that is masked.

So, a quick round of input on any one of the three (or a solution I 
haven't thought of) solutions would be nice, in order to 'fix' the ruby 
bug instead of letting it slide.  It's wrong anyway.


-- 
Fabian Groffen
Gentoo for Mac OS X Project -- Interim Lead
-- 
gentoo-osx@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-osx] Ruby issue

[Finn Thain]

On Thu, 6 Oct 2005, Grobian wrote:

> Some of you might have noticed the Ruby (security) issue.  I'd like to have a
> quick round on it.
> 
> A short situation sketch:
> - ruby 1.8.2 compiles with some patches made by usata on Panther
> - ruby 1.8.2 collides on Tiger with system installed ruby
> - ruby 1.8.2 contains security vulnerability and stuff
> - ruby 1.8.3 is safe(r)
> - ruby 1.8.3 doesn't compile on Panther due to autoconf 2.59 requirement

Can the appropriate autoconf be added to the base system?

-f

> - ruby 1.8.3 of course also collides on Tiger
> - ruby 1.8.2 is marked ppc-macos stable
> - ruby 1.8.3 is marked ~ppc-macos unstable
> 
> ruby is for Tiger in p.mask, since the sec. bug I added the mask in the
> Panther profile too, however, that's not really a solution, and the sec. guys
> want more action from us, basically.
> 
> I can think of three 'solutions':
> 1. drop ppc-macos keyword for all ruby keywords.
>    This is drastical, but since ruby won't have a nice mariage with OSX
>    using oldstyle Gentoo/OSX it solves the problem for good.
> 2. drop ppc-macos keyword in 1.8.2 and replace it with 1.8.3
>    This is bad because we basically drop the keyword, but it leaves us
>    with the 'desired' state of having only ~ppc-macos.
> 3. stable 1.8.3
>    This feels bad to me, but it's what the sec. guys want to see.  It
>    makes sense for progressive users (although I don't know of any real
>    ones).  We would stable a package without testing that is masked.
> 
> So, a quick round of input on any one of the three (or a solution I haven't
> thought of) solutions would be nice, in order to 'fix' the ruby bug instead of
> letting it slide.  It's wrong anyway.
> 
> 
> 
-- 
gentoo-osx@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-osx] Ruby issue

[Grobian]

Finn Thain wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 6 Oct 2005, Grobian wrote:
>> A short situation sketch:
>> - ruby 1.8.2 compiles with some patches made by usata on Panther
>> - ruby 1.8.2 collides on Tiger with system installed ruby
>> - ruby 1.8.2 contains security vulnerability and stuff
>> - ruby 1.8.3 is safe(r)
>> - ruby 1.8.3 doesn't compile on Panther due to autoconf 2.59 requirement
> 
> Can the appropriate autoconf be added to the base system?

No, because it collides with the system installed one.  For progressive 
people this shouldn't be a problem at all.

-- 
Fabian Groffen
Gentoo for Mac OS X Project -- Interim Lead
-- 
gentoo-osx@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-osx] Ruby issue

[Grobian]

I decided to go for option 2, consider it done.

Grobian wrote:
> Some of you might have noticed the Ruby (security) issue.  I'd like to 
> have a quick round on it.
> 
> A short situation sketch:
> - ruby 1.8.2 compiles with some patches made by usata on Panther
> - ruby 1.8.2 collides on Tiger with system installed ruby
> - ruby 1.8.2 contains security vulnerability and stuff
> - ruby 1.8.3 is safe(r)
> - ruby 1.8.3 doesn't compile on Panther due to autoconf 2.59 requirement
> - ruby 1.8.3 of course also collides on Tiger
> - ruby 1.8.2 is marked ppc-macos stable
> - ruby 1.8.3 is marked ~ppc-macos unstable
> 
> ruby is for Tiger in p.mask, since the sec. bug I added the mask in the 
> Panther profile too, however, that's not really a solution, and the sec. 
> guys want more action from us, basically.
> 
> I can think of three 'solutions':
> 1. drop ppc-macos keyword for all ruby keywords.
>    This is drastical, but since ruby won't have a nice mariage with OSX
>    using oldstyle Gentoo/OSX it solves the problem for good.
> 2. drop ppc-macos keyword in 1.8.2 and replace it with 1.8.3
>    This is bad because we basically drop the keyword, but it leaves us
>    with the 'desired' state of having only ~ppc-macos.
> 3. stable 1.8.3
>    This feels bad to me, but it's what the sec. guys want to see.  It
>    makes sense for progressive users (although I don't know of any real
>    ones).  We would stable a package without testing that is masked.
> 
> So, a quick round of input on any one of the three (or a solution I 
> haven't thought of) solutions would be nice, in order to 'fix' the ruby 
> bug instead of letting it slide.  It's wrong anyway.
> 
> 

-- 
Fabian Groffen
Gentoo for Mac OS X Project -- Interim Lead
-- 
gentoo-osx@gentoo.org mailing list