From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EC1VO-00043L-Sd for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 20:54:23 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j84Kofp3008131; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 20:50:41 GMT Received: from hermes.orakel.ods.org (dsl67-66.fastxdsl.nl [62.251.66.67]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j84KoeZf003916 for <gentoo-osx@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 4 Sep 2005 20:50:40 GMT Received: from aphrodite.orakel.ods.org ([172.17.2.15]) by hermes.orakel.ods.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.50) id 1EC1Uj-0001oG-1h for gentoo-osx@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 22:53:42 +0200 Message-ID: <431B5ED4.6050605@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 22:53:40 +0200 From: Grobian <grobian@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo Foundation User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.0+ (Macintosh/20050813) Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-osx@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-osx+help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-osx+unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-osx+subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-osx.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-osx@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-osx@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-osx@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-osx] Arch Testing Policy and Procedures References: <87387351-FB42-4D57-8602-8FFC0794DE40@gentoo.org> <431AD2FE.3020706@gentoo.org> <2436D2AF-C880-4636-9E3B-F1761795A929@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <2436D2AF-C880-4636-9E3B-F1761795A929@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Scanned: by hermes.orakel.ods.org (Exim Exiscan) using SpamAssassin and ClamAV X-Archives-Salt: 95834917-82c6-4fab-9991-74bb8f8d0a03 X-Archives-Hash: 4b287801f95745466ecdf419afaf0afe Just to be a pain in the place where the sun don't shine (but I seem to be destined to be), I really don't think we need ATs. Really, I can easily cope with the bugs that are being reported. In fact, I *am* some sort of the AT, and once I have gone through the whole list of bugs, there will be not enough work to keep my AT-work going. Ok, I'm on hold here at the very moment, but like I used to work here, I don't really see the need for some ATs. The idea is fantastic, but we don't have enough work. We just don't have people that like doing the AT work. I have been doing it for a few weeks now I think, and don't care about it much. It's ok with me. Once I'm finished with it, I'll have to resort in doing something else for the project that is eligable to be 'fixable'. At least if you let me, of course. With respect to your further announcements, in the last few weeks my opinion on anything Gentoo/OSX related has changed, so don't expect my opinion to be the same. One could say, my vision 'grows'. Lina Pezzella wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > On Sep 4, 2005, at 6:57 AM, Grobian wrote: > >>> - --Lina Pezzella && Hasan Khalil >>> Ebuild & Porting Co-Leads >>> Gentoo for OS X >>> [1] http://dev.gentoo.org/~gongloo/macos/doc/at-procedures.html >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (Darwin) >>> iD8DBQFDGlv7NJ9STR9DbYERAqJ1AKCgQ73vaFfulp1tvXt3FhMOAckZvgCgqO9t >>> +xaXd/DKXUW0ZmJxomn8vYw= >>> =GZ6D >>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >>> --gentoo-osx@gentoo.org mailing list -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo for Mac OS X -- gentoo-osx@gentoo.org mailing list