From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1F2Bkh-0007oM-Un for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 18:21:48 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k0QILLA1010935; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 18:21:21 GMT Received: from hermes.orakel.ods.org (dsl67-66.fastxdsl.nl [62.251.66.67]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k0QILLcG030132 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 18:21:21 GMT Received: from aphrodite.orakel.ods.org ([172.17.2.15]) by hermes.orakel.ods.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1F2BkG-0006NJ-Cj for gentoo-osx@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 19:21:20 +0100 Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 19:21:18 +0100 From: Grobian To: gentoo-osx@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-osx] Current installation method Message-ID: <20060126182118.GA29884@gentoo.org> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-osx@lists.gentoo.org References: <43D804D4.2010309@gentoo.org> <20060126082228.GC12007@gentoo.org> <43D906A2.4080405@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-osx@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-osx@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43D906A2.4080405@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/ng-r655 (Darwin 8.4.0, VIM - Vi IMproved 6.2) Organization: Gentoo Foundation, Inc. X-Content-Scanned: by hermes.orakel.ods.org (Exim Exiscan) using SpamAssassin and ClamAV X-Archives-Salt: e80ea4b6-4bd5-4aec-9d8a-7f1ee813132b X-Archives-Hash: b87b498df63521c6474bc247b9d7aa31 On 26-01-2006 12:28:02 -0500, Nick Dimiduk wrote: > >>started putting together a .pkg (for my own uses) based on the most recent > >>portage-2.1 ebuild and it occurred to me that this may not be appropriate. > >>I'd be happy to clean it up for general distribution. > >Does 2.1 work properly on OSX? I have problems with 2.0.53 and up... > > Should I use the latest 2.0.52? Just "upgrade" to the latest from the installer (mind the collision-protect issue...): 2.0.51.22-r3 > My intention is to build a clean chroot for the reliable testing of > packages for keywording. I don't mind doing so for the prefix version > of portage; my understanding is that it's not quite ready yet. I'd > like to work on keywording in the mean time. I'll try to contact kito > directly for more details. Good. Very good. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo for Mac OS X Project -- gentoo-osx@gentoo.org mailing list