On Sun, 2019-07-14 at 12:32 -0400, Aaron Bauman wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 05:24:16PM +0100, Roy Bamford wrote:
> > On 2019.07.14 15:40, Aaron Bauman wrote:
> > [snip]
> > 
> > > This can be fixed by proper by-laws, ...
> > 
> > [snip]
> > > -- 
> > > Cheers,
> > > Aaron
> > > 
> > 
> > That's over simplification.  For things to get fixed,
> > people have to do stuff. By-laws don't ensure 
> > anything gets done.
> > 
> > -- 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > Roy Bamford
> > (Neddyseagoon) a member of
> > elections
> > gentoo-ops
> > forum-mods
> > arm64
> 
> You are correct.  It alone does not "fix it", but it does hold the board in
> violation of retaining one.  Which in turn means Section 5.6 comes into play for
> the general membership.
> 
> As other comments I have made stated, by-laws govern the trustees just as much
> as the general membership.
> 

No offense meant but reading your posts, I start feeling like your
solution to all the problems boils down to 'force Trustees to fix them,
and if they don't, then force them more'.  I'm not yet sure if this
involves pursuing legal responsibility on past Trustees (i.e. punishing
them for trying to fix stuff but being unable to fix it entirely), or
just pursuing current Trustees to the point that nobody will stand for
elections.

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny