From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11C881382C5 for ; Mon, 9 Apr 2018 11:08:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 449C6E0997; Mon, 9 Apr 2018 11:08:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17D70E0997 for ; Mon, 9 Apr 2018 11:08:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eris.zipang (pl48393.ag1212.nttpc.ne.jp [1.33.233.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: lu_zero) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E353B335C09; Mon, 9 Apr 2018 11:08:35 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-nfp] Agenda item: Formalize Gentoo's org structure To: gentoo-nfp@lists.gentoo.org, Matthew Thode References: <20180409102452.mrbt7pkplbcblojt@gentoo.org> From: Luca Barbato Message-ID: Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2018 20:08:31 +0900 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-nfp@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-nfp@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180409102452.mrbt7pkplbcblojt@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 56a8c083-e21f-4033-9dcf-80959affa4ec X-Archives-Hash: d224a6b6020e366551e0d50b187ddb27 On 09/04/2018 19:24, Matthew Thode wrote: > Gentoo has been known to be a two headed entity for a while. While the > fact is that only one of the heads has legal standing to be called > Gentoo, the other head has been doing most of the technical work. > Unfortunately having two heads means that there can be fighting between > them. In order to finally put the matter to some rest I seek to define > Gentoo's org structure. > The structure is quite simple: - a money-managing entity with the task of collecting donations and paying for activities - an informal organization, with an elective council acting as steering committee, doing stuff that makes people willing to donate money so the informal organization keeps delivering nice stuff. The Debian people aren't members by default of Assoli or SPI(or any of the many money collectors on-behalf-of they have. It is the nth times that you keep suggesting something that ultimately gets (mis)interpreted as a way for the foundation to meddle with the Gentoo organizational processes. lu PS: Comrel is independent from the council beside in case of appeal, please stop repeating something that is not correct.