From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-nfp+bounces-1706-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D14641382C5
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sun, 15 Apr 2018 01:42:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 33C67E092E;
Sun, 15 Apr 2018 01:42:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-it0-x236.google.com (mail-it0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::236])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0401FE092E
for <gentoo-nfp@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 15 Apr 2018 01:42:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-it0-x236.google.com with SMTP id 145-v6so1506619itf.5
for <gentoo-nfp@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 14 Apr 2018 18:42:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=funtoo-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=XGe/kd0BXKlgv1st8yAM36nCujGLHEg+8cHjPc1Bh10=;
b=Eiygj5zWhnhtjBFbI14IQ0z2uQvqE0ve/Mb6kuhsenVNSTTS9TAHas1uFHRs+/BYXV
NP5iz6rITeQP0hvfSH9XnklRdW+lb5jLwFICnzOpJRNj+oO4+1gopKM4Y7c9S91q59LO
vuIn0Jag7nTGuTAMSBCN48kZhaeThYcWPHPC3kmD3UTK/je/jwyUgqP4DieVN41Z/yAS
Bdai0UJvJ5Ayhz58UKxs4tvZXBGr24YYcORIuob2SGIGMMU3OJtGWvLc6Yy2TmnB9R7W
8ht828D7MgWzwgjrBF3S2vRlrlNVbaSN8xC0VejEYxl8mhYjSedAt1svTPwhEVRjDe0i
PyEA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:to;
bh=XGe/kd0BXKlgv1st8yAM36nCujGLHEg+8cHjPc1Bh10=;
b=KPILpMQYa+VQJIS0/4eeF0jNvX7tqWnL/y9m1mxmN2URHYr6AurtUlb5Z8ItxlnhpH
uMu9I0UZbUksZRxulfgoihKJitxzyz9EHHPAs8AH/9JwXWjeHUgffizctNe/i19HHLnA
o2qTSGhtjHc4yDwiaVlvTQbNjO2Kmf9ycUUrLrPlS6X6K0YyDMxKYvnuWUtUgKqs2kSw
obVGsDEFbTzi0RgQ6DrIF8lue42L8lh1KnEM10qykpAKCY9v54cgKjw+ti3VZNsH3en8
C4UlwxU4dc/Cvzmk8JRXGj0nEkxuE5KBTn6mKJrO9wlgZdY4GRkwAMbFKn/qm3jzCPxZ
wxdA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tCzAqRW+LLLzJXkCQ4meWKsSPnam3qvO26wM606PzU3/75TkFU0
L7ixb2FTNUY60QYL/+g9lzkerUjE+b0e0rL6JfQD5E+s
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4/Abwb5cBRqBEcB4C1dCJl4WBKW/VAVMvb4ZbwqiC1WMFDPfCT8NVCw0y4QlMqg+TlFboErQ/24tERi+7Shcz0=
X-Received: by 2002:a24:7dcc:: with SMTP id b195-v6mr10607718itc.149.1523756549432;
Sat, 14 Apr 2018 18:42:29 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-nfp@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-nfp+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-nfp+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-nfp+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-nfp.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-nfp@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-To: gentoo-nfp@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.79.78.215 with HTTP; Sat, 14 Apr 2018 18:42:28 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <d6662eb9-be69-3d44-beb0-cb18e8adbc6e@gentoo.org>
References: <20180410205106.lium4dz6kzucgrxo@gentoo.org> <CAGfcS_nGsLOjDZU47fefrOeGe2aom38mq6N8=xdLj_QMEu_L0g@mail.gmail.com>
<1523742677.27031.1.camel@gentoo.org> <CAPDOV4-Ftx8bA4L=VStd6=+WsrE_Trs-4gp88M_o0F5Aay5BRg@mail.gmail.com>
<d6662eb9-be69-3d44-beb0-cb18e8adbc6e@gentoo.org>
From: Daniel Robbins <drobbins@funtoo.org>
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2018 19:42:28 -0600
Message-ID: <CAPDOV4_baw8sipihya2RcOGWrPMtePpUkiP=ASk-gHuaF-Zmmg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] [gentoo-nfp] Foundation meeting agenda for April
2018 - update1
To: gentoo-nfp <gentoo-nfp@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000da835e0569d93772"
X-Archives-Salt: b2f09191-93f7-4049-ad21-8bea3bcdee38
X-Archives-Hash: f705547e3824fa4eec9e3df4902ea35f
--000000000000da835e0569d93772
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 6:46 PM, Luca Barbato <lu_zero@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > The people behind the ban appear to be the usual suspects running
> > ComRel/Council.
>
> Yet another friendly warning: this kind of unsubstantiated got you
> already time off the mailing list.
>
Can you please explain what I did wrong and point to the CoC to support
your position? "Usual suspects" in this case is mgorny, ulm, dilfridge.
Mgorny and ulm are on council, dilfridge runs ComRel.
In the mean time, Luca, is ComRel planning to take an actions on mgorny's
suggestion that William be shot? Even if tongue in cheek, I am sure you
realize it's inappropriate.
Wltjr managed to get its longer time off the ml because of its repeated
> small breaches of the CoC and ban evasions.
>
> You seem to try to follow his lead with all your strength.
>
Could you please explain your comment that I am trying to "follow his lead
with all [my] strength"? And explain how this comment is not worse from a
CoC perspective than my "usual suspects" comment. If you call me out on
"usual suspects", then you shouldn't make insinuations about me either.
Either both comments are wrong or both insinuations are fair game on this
list.
Please be consistent, and don't be part of the problem.
-Daniel
--000000000000da835e0569d93772
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On S=
at, Apr 14, 2018 at 6:46 PM, Luca Barbato <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"=
mailto:lu_zero@gentoo.org" target=3D"_blank">lu_zero@gentoo.org</a>></sp=
an> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;=
border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class=3D"">> The peop=
le behind the ban appear to be the usual suspects running<br>
> ComRel/Council.<br>
<br>
</span>Yet another friendly warning: this kind of unsubstantiated got you<b=
r>
already time off the mailing list.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Can =
you please explain what I did wrong and point to the CoC to support your po=
sition? "Usual suspects" in this case is mgorny, ulm, dilfridge. =
Mgorny and ulm are on council, dilfridge runs ComRel.=C2=A0</div><div><br><=
/div><div>In the mean time, Luca, is ComRel planning to take an actions on =
mgorny's suggestion that William be shot? Even if tongue in cheek, I am=
sure you realize it's inappropriate.</div><div><br></div><blockquote c=
lass=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;=
padding-left:1ex">
Wltjr managed to get its longer time off the ml because of its repeated<br>
small breaches of the CoC and ban evasions.<br>
<br>
You seem to try to follow his lead with all your strength.<br></blockquote>=
<div><br></div><div>Could you please explain your comment that I am trying =
to "follow his lead with all [my] strength"? And explain how this=
comment is not worse from a CoC perspective than my "usual suspects&q=
uot; comment. If you call me out on "usual suspects", then you sh=
ouldn't make insinuations about me either. Either both comments are wro=
ng or both insinuations are fair game on this list.</div><div><br></div><di=
v>Please be consistent, and don't be part of the problem.</div><div><br=
></div><div>-Daniel=C2=A0<br></div></div></div></div>
--000000000000da835e0569d93772--