public inbox for gentoo-nfp@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-project <gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>
Cc: gentoo-nfp <gentoo-nfp@lists.gentoo.org>,
	Gentoo Elections <elections@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-nfp] 2021 Trustees election
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2021 10:58:31 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGfcS_k8sT7n9DJCXGv4ByAEB8yGKBKL5jBYt8VSChdbXuYNjg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YOW3ShXgiP2r5x4c@Aaron-Baumans-MacBook-Pro.local>

On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 10:16 AM Aaron Bauman <bman@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 07:32:12AM +0300, Joonas Niilola wrote:
> >
> > Out of curiosity, with an umbrella organization could there be any fear
> > for a similar takeover that happened with Freenode?
> >
>
> There is a possibility of such, but it is highly unlikely.
>
> More realistic/probable concerns are umbrellas enforcing
> rules/guidelines/requirements that Gentoo may not agree with.

IMO these are effectively the same thing.  When the situation with
Freenode was nothing more than a legal formality nobody cared about
it.  As soon as it starts to have practical impact on how things work
(or is anticipated to), that is when everybody starts getting upset.

I do think some of your examples are the sorts of things that are very
likely to come up based on current trends, and you can use your
imagination to consider others.  Whether these are a concern or not is
going to vary based on individual sentiments.

Either way (umbrella takeover or internal takeover), the "Libera
solution" would still be an option.  This is why I think that the best
defense against hostile takeover is minimizing dependence on lots of
complex infrastructure for core functions.  The less you have to
replace the less painful it is to do.  If ICE or whatever seized
gentoo.org, and our emails all start bouncing and DNS addresses of
servers/etc stop resolving, do enough people know how to find each
other to put the band back together (I'm guessing we wouldn't lose
access to IRC in that case, so probably yes)?

This isn't intended to start a tangent, just to point out that this
legal risk is hard to avoid when your operational and legal orgs are
somewhat disjoint.

-- 
Rich


  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-07 14:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-28  3:11 [gentoo-nfp] 2021 Trustees election Alec Warner
2021-07-06 13:54 ` Ulrich Mueller
2021-07-07 19:24   ` Alec Warner
2021-07-06 14:47 ` Alice
2021-07-06 19:27 ` Andreas K. Huettel
2021-07-07 18:14   ` Mike Gilbert
2021-07-06 21:29 ` Aaron Bauman
2021-07-06 21:32   ` [gentoo-project] " Michał Górny
     [not found]     ` <CAEdQ38FxH+ow7LVyH1RC+iGgEzkto2xyFxjr6EfMr9H=ivUoeg@mail.gmail.com>
2021-07-06 22:20       ` Michał Górny
2021-07-06 22:27       ` Aaron Bauman
     [not found]         ` <CAEdQ38F1JhoqGyE690Mabj3ou0L0vuV32EimN75+_8BPQgp25w@mail.gmail.com>
2021-07-07  1:50           ` Aaron Bauman
     [not found]             ` <CAEdQ38GapyOVLDgfda-YoF=+ezAaacpVKPXAkwGbHJ63zUnWag@mail.gmail.com>
2021-07-07 14:26               ` Aaron Bauman
2021-07-07 14:39                 ` Michał Górny
2021-07-07 15:21                   ` Aaron Bauman
     [not found]                 ` <CAEdQ38G1DC0i=5CKiE9uz0kMhCGniyK1sONDCyjQQMM_r9P8EA@mail.gmail.com>
2021-07-07 18:22                   ` Aaron Bauman
2021-07-07 18:44                   ` Alec Warner
2021-07-07 19:34                   ` Robin H. Johnson
2021-07-07  4:32       ` Joonas Niilola
2021-07-07  6:18         ` Michał Górny
2021-07-07 14:16         ` Aaron Bauman
2021-07-07 14:58           ` Rich Freeman [this message]
2021-07-07 15:23             ` Aaron Bauman
2021-07-06 23:46   ` Andreas K. Huettel
2021-07-07  8:11   ` Ulrich Mueller
2021-07-07 16:34   ` Rich Freeman
2021-07-06 21:47 ` [gentoo-nfp] 2021 Trustees election - self-nomination & manifesto Robin H. Johnson
2021-07-14  9:59 ` [gentoo-nfp] 2021 Trustees election - nominations end in 14 hours Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAGfcS_k8sT7n9DJCXGv4ByAEB8yGKBKL5jBYt8VSChdbXuYNjg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=rich0@gentoo.org \
    --cc=elections@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-nfp@lists.gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox