From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F93D138334 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2018 16:02:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 287E8E085B; Sun, 10 Jun 2018 16:02:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ot0-x22b.google.com (mail-ot0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD39EE084E for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2018 16:02:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ot0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id q17-v6so21088749otg.2 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2018 09:02:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=lDBoVjLfkdKKVLeAzKacaH4dkB2FqRSQ1vgPtY6tbRA=; b=naIdYlogOGs1/8pP6ZhOy1jwFH+LF2VFK2fsCg4mnH6tLP0xcvmt6CO80WnfCqqxHJ ulwC3rnFI59LkN3pGc6qIP85bdDdDLQPZ9xxypT8MnIgdCSemgqVdYBHI3bsrMuV39H9 dP8J7gS03+zLL6ejkweGfR4n7UOQ+LjVYeyEW/1Ng5vDbQhEospAQG/QBm7jYdj3nQgx 8JXISizU9WSRiHFhfJop4vgscRjTntNf3+oh+m5e0zuzRmgFqKgabJ9rfWyD++vfmJyH J6e8KRtXpGWvguvnO4Kcsewz4ntqAE6W24GJ/jj0pEGkmuE40+1BBAnpBKWmAoQ1EJs5 4ZHw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=lDBoVjLfkdKKVLeAzKacaH4dkB2FqRSQ1vgPtY6tbRA=; b=KMKLndl6fNW0pTSxdJnfy6B1UqCLno9NcUIPqil4MLbsQKDz8+p6s1Lf4Xe6NBFPj7 M4s7sT5SKfOOqRyezDsi+yaWDM7bTEM+OsjCNTOnPbVlv0+HBJla8eJQIpDS+AObJlxM vhincqAwOhGJbWaoNnVaWxxLh2dsnr3K4SyZr84eETWSzUtFW1eGXcG+amhBqwK9mkM8 3Sh9/A45mFF12eHbWIg3049P4vE4Rlu8Ihdr+KTn/z7wL9zNy5gJMemFTf8ge7wupuOu 8ZRMPkdhAmEJyIWd5zEG0w5kAITkZZAaTnrFk9af68PbjzEMFC2mfgr9VD7ZeNginA4x ySNg== X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E1bQsG45J33JxhGV5ANh3C8WF2zccVcj4qzdtUlqJ5CxnIYEgJ0 LTQOa27wonXQ15JO9tjJ87HD+TJEC+E5QvIeTZMx7w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKKlntH6dhcjjFhIXb5Du3v8CbQuL/CKKYPfcJaz55weLyWjBnHv7e1Cs1HyPCnaAYNQ8JFsfspJy3VKigk7emk= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:3835:: with SMTP id i50-v6mr8373248otc.382.1528646519355; Sun, 10 Jun 2018 09:01:59 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-nfp@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-nfp@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Raymond Jennings Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2018 09:01:23 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: [gentoo-nfp] Sharp words, continued conflict To: Trustees , gentoo-nfp Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Archives-Salt: 2224d467-0938-4b8c-8acf-79a00a7014cf X-Archives-Hash: e754e7eb32ad807023cdb9223ab53e3d https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-project/message/70f054aac20e5c80f14590cc5cbf4418 This was brought to my attention and given the language used it concerns me. It seems like the council does not trust the trustees. In particular the mention of the phrase "(dys)function", as well as the terms in the section d) at the bottom of the linked message above. With the above in mind, would the trustees please continue their diligence at improving the situation.