Re: [gentoo-nfp] Re: Forming Gentoo Policy - Copyright Assignment and Attribution

[Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>]

(Resending since I sent the first copy to gentoo-dev-announce instead
of gentoo-dev)

The first email said:

On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 2:29 PM, Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org> wrote:
> With Regard to Copyright Assignment
> We'd like to propose that we create an agreement similar to the FSFe
> FLA and what is used by KDE to allow for VOLUNTARY assignment of
> copyright to the Gentoo Foundation.

And the second says:

On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org> wrote:
> If you have any concerns/objections to the policy which was outlined,
> which includes a mandatory requirement to sign a contributor license
> agreement and an option to also sign an assignment-like document based
> on the FSFe FLA, please speak up this week.

Voluntary to mandatory. That seems pretty fucking different?

I don't know if this was an oversight, a mistake, or a deliberate
change, (or maybe I just misread?) but it needs to be addressed.