From: Alec Warner <antarus@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-nfp <gentoo-nfp@lists.gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-nfp] infra agenda item
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 12:56:16 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAr7Pr9FkAR55qU7uK6MxdEBVwkyQBDjCNLdXVEz+3yQJ72EoQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPDOV49UOgDy1NMyGsoCSk6N=N=Gqse3RXh7WfH76dPO-=4Q=g@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1502 bytes --]
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 12:48 PM, Daniel Robbins <drobbins@funtoo.org>
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 10:43 AM, Alec Warner <antarus@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> Specifically regarding your proposal, I'm not sure what outcome you are
>> actually expecting. Explicitly stating that the Foundation owns and
>> controls assets that it literally owns and controls seems a bit
>> tautological (and thus of little value.) It might be useful to state that
>> in that event of a 'hostile takeover' type situation the board will pursue
>> all legal remedies; but this too seems somewhat tautological (but I'm open
>> to more leeway here.)
>>
>
> Yes, it is unclear as to how specifically this is protected against, and
> if it is the case that sufficient safeguards are in place, and that
> everyone involved in -infra is aware that the
>
Foundation essentially is ultimately 'in charge' of the servers, then this
> issues, as far as I can tell, is resolved.
>
I think for now its the general culture from the current infrastructure
lead (robbat2) and the draft policy that tries to clearly describe the
situation. At least the current infra team is aware of a number of past
incidents (one being the one you mentioned, but there are others) and IMHO
avoiding impropriety (and avoiding even the appearance of impropriety) is
pretty high upon our list.
I'll try to aim for the policy to be out by the next meeting; but the infra
lead is pretty busy with work so it might not be finalized.
-A
>
> -Daniel
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2801 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-10 16:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-10 16:27 [gentoo-nfp] infra agenda item Daniel Robbins
2018-04-10 16:43 ` Alec Warner
2018-04-10 16:48 ` Daniel Robbins
2018-04-10 16:56 ` Alec Warner [this message]
2018-04-10 21:52 ` Raymond Jennings
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAAr7Pr9FkAR55qU7uK6MxdEBVwkyQBDjCNLdXVEz+3yQJ72EoQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=antarus@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-nfp@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox