From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6BA8138334 for ; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 15:50:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 13841E0974; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 15:50:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ed1-f45.google.com (mail-ed1-f45.google.com [209.85.208.45]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD290E0974 for ; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 15:50:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ed1-f45.google.com with SMTP id g32-v6so8979202edg.13 for ; Thu, 04 Oct 2018 08:50:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=mks1FE5ju8LItHW4CKx7rPLnu+n5T+YepFatL4jd/+E=; b=DSS5U7L9JNcZXvXdTGAnatuyHT3Gu14Ccxq4+lAEes5xEg5p1O+G3eRyhCFhonJ8tm 3wvtscr4tHLjrepyaGuI3efvY37VEREg1r07stPxp9bSnir7Zl0dnFfH5ioIF1kzYIsZ 49E9pES+OQ5GriH3QAU5t1WHEdRzfBtKgVqIbd4i5b/r7fNQg8r36KIMaxsZeNSUM/Bf U83CQEG+q7GtJUiK/RxcGIjhUdoSIxdCtNOemBVpnBTIN8AAsarr3SD3X8cUmrqbQZYz RIgbiRmGluyzScdF53WxaGukwiaYZOZkTOIpEkVC8mOGasoIn6zsLz37gROrA5Gj44iM hyvw== X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfohbFHE75z9yXfkOUcWduyEcvG/7cvVGdlLBDg+G/PvY1cHuMWSK LrAtSNpCZnLuBjCt4S73VKlnOnxDx9/67jigN3ESFEizIZ0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV60jAk4C8AUOD5C/kaLiZ5D6s0CiZPCniPADKSJZHzXHx84e0RKVaxGHeC34O3ZL+cN623AgftBcEitSopBALhM= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:7650:: with SMTP id d16-v6mr7256880ejn.157.1538668219098; Thu, 04 Oct 2018 08:50:19 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-nfp@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-nfp@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Alec Warner Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2018 11:50:07 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-nfp] Please vote on this proposal related to http://bugs.gentoo.org/667602 To: Ulrich Mueller Cc: gentoo-nfp Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a07df60577691cdc" X-Archives-Salt: 49d44796-53b3-4ff6-9a83-cc376088f9dd X-Archives-Hash: 1a01c7f01e3b1100a5cddd141c06bf9a --000000000000a07df60577691cdc Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 11:41 AM Ulrich Mueller wrote: > >>>>> On Thu, 04 Oct 2018, Alec Warner wrote: > > > The bug requests that a reprieve be granted until the company reviews > > the new policy and (hopefully) grants approval. This would be in the > > form of an allowlist where specific identities (approved by some > > delegate of council && trustees) do not require an SoB line to commit > > for some period of time. > > Does this imply that whitelisted developers are exempt from the > copyright policy altogether? Or are they expected to follow all other > aspects of the copyright policy, with the Signed-off-by line being the > only exception? > The bug wording was: "We are requesting a 30 day reprieve on the hard enforcement of sign-off-by lines in commits to give our legal dept time to approve the new copyright policy." Is that clear? This proposal is 90 days, and the reprieve only applies to approved whitelisted identities. -A > > Please clarify. > > Ulrich > --000000000000a07df60577691cdc Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Thu= , Oct 4, 2018 at 11:41 AM Ulrich Mueller <ulm@gentoo.org> wrote:
&= gt;>>>> On Thu, 04 Oct 2018, Alec Warner wrote:

> The bug requests that a reprieve be granted until the company reviews<= br> > the new policy and (hopefully) grants approval. This would be in the > form of an allowlist where specific identities (approved by some
> delegate of council && trustees) do not require an SoB line to= commit
> for some period of time.

Does this imply that whitelisted developers are exempt from the
copyright policy altogether? Or are they expected to follow all other
aspects of the copyright policy, with the Signed-off-by line being the
only exception?

The bug wording was:
"We are requesting a 30 day reprieve on the hard enforcement of=
sign-off-by lines in commits to give our legal dept time to approve the=
new copyright policy."

<= div class=3D"gmail_quote">Is that clear? This proposal is 90 days, and the = reprieve only applies to approved whitelisted identities.

-A
=C2=A0

Please clarify.

Ulrich
--000000000000a07df60577691cdc--