From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32FCA138334 for ; Sat, 7 Sep 2019 06:31:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 433B5E0A99; Sat, 7 Sep 2019 06:31:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E30CE0A99 for ; Sat, 7 Sep 2019 06:31:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiot (c134-66.icpnet.pl [85.221.134.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2601634AD8D; Sat, 7 Sep 2019 06:31:00 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <3c8472b8830180623a5e44b16e9972e3fc9214c7.camel@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-nfp] [RFC] Alternative methods for determining 'interest in Foundation affairs' From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= To: gentoo-nfp@lists.gentoo.org Date: Sat, 07 Sep 2019 08:30:56 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <52090ee2-28ee-8a98-b2ca-53433156b7fb@veremit.xyz> <0f27513d3f0e3f9fbdfc8818f0def9b60a56f516.camel@gmail.com> Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-VNwVH4fz+8NfeqbDbSlz" User-Agent: Evolution 3.30.5 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-nfp@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-nfp@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: 4eb78e33-af88-4160-a43b-4d906e46a55d X-Archives-Hash: ee8d7f828f3a382410862f0c44389498 --=-VNwVH4fz+8NfeqbDbSlz Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2019-09-06 at 16:16 -0700, Alec Warner wrote: > The minimum board size in New Mexico is 3; so technically its possible to > drop two seats and run a board that is [b-man, alicef, mgorny] and robin > and I and prometheanfire can all resign. But in the end I think we will > face similar problems; there just are not enough humans left who care to = do > this job. Strengthening the Foundation means finding humans who are willi= ng > to do this long term and most people are not. The people who want the > umbrella are not "seeking power" (I want the umbrella and I'm the board > president!) we want it because we think the umbrella will do at worst, th= e > same job we have done and at best, do a better job. >=20 For the record, I offered to join to aim in dissolving the Foundation, not to run keep it running long term. AFAIK Alice is the only person on the Board who wants to keep the existing Foundation running. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --=-VNwVH4fz+8NfeqbDbSlz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGTBAABCgB9FiEEx2qEUJQJjSjMiybFY5ra4jKeJA4FAl1zTqFfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEM3 NkE4NDUwOTQwOThEMjhDQzhCMjZDNTYzOUFEQUUyMzI5RTI0MEUACgkQY5ra4jKe JA7cfwgA0R+l82AcoZhrCfkM8lGsJ8NrvZwP4PVzyKn9YRrcvYJhL2oJ5LNQ+K6d 9lzW1I7u+J+ktMmjCV3nPKMJpIvivGOY/PsGudkqPqj9Kq6XgXl4/Gu+wsr6FFWZ rGQr0u4T2xk0npS5jldY+l8KhofR1yyov2820rwqw0t5qz8KU+JNmXfChAk/aBkp BflWQxgzPYkgZ7NGBrd+nYCTv7oJd9tgk/pGZYGVYHbXV4A6kdg6ydXOlyF0Is1l gQ5k46ikbiz5pKMfB9095lXAKjyO+eXBTZPINASY/0Fqo9JQsKIY3VVs0pp7Ygg5 suZkCbOT0nc4fz9fPH8wLausLOA4Cw== =pEzs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-VNwVH4fz+8NfeqbDbSlz--