>>>>> On Sun, 03 Jun 2018, Roy Bamford wrote:

> Not having a quorum prevents a vote of members taking place.
> However, there has never been a need for a vote of members at any
> meeting of members.

Why do we have meetings of members then?

> Due to the difficulties of counting both votes and members present,
> I don't think an IRC 'show of hands' can ever be relied on.

> I'm not against the proposed change, I just think its changing from 
> one value that is not useful, to a different value that is also not
> useful.  

With the current number of about 90 to 100 members. the one-tenth
quorum would be 10 members being present during a meeting. This should
be quite possible to achieve. Plus, I don't see why a roll call would
be difficult.

Ulrich