From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-musl+bounces-111-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CB741382AD
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 08:28:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1F687E0883;
	Tue, 14 Jun 2016 08:28:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-oi0-f50.google.com (mail-oi0-f50.google.com [209.85.218.50])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3756E0883
	for <gentoo-musl@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 08:28:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-oi0-f50.google.com with SMTP id w5so166503259oib.2
        for <gentoo-musl@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 01:28:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :cc;
        bh=A3r2LvhBKddjWUtjFaKYnU61XMLVV4CZppeMVgCVp3I=;
        b=VAMHMdojyN/MoBvSH2npXB+hggoDpTqhYbZIv2oPzMLzY7naJmLPtrgUeMtt05ty0C
         RAnCGQFV2TkWco2PHgCiGNp9Sot8R0Yxo1/nBGYIqmoNylQkCei0t9JVBoKdiv0jUQYd
         yeipeEjqCmFRjBD4QrXM7kZ0DUrSrQxHMfr66LNFZv0RyVTpK7ew2o+TS7q0QPC23/5q
         IOFkceqYyHrpjMkv5eKT50nC6RRLPsn2RiUMepnPbVKLnOkn+SpBIffieQPz39Puw85/
         G7IOrvKExX345S24t44UhNUndkhvrOAhwI2DggGjHWlO4UP1WNuJeK96jWHC6PfmMn5/
         kyoA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to:cc;
        bh=A3r2LvhBKddjWUtjFaKYnU61XMLVV4CZppeMVgCVp3I=;
        b=WpR0J6ZgWgWY11vTZO0yGtIyskqDYyaD7sz6JhNNK2Po8W3+myH5v4sAZ0Mco20iPs
         0jhv2dP1DTLS25G3Dt8TVQNuAooUIrTyioEO/5yRoKddjaV/qvlRGoxnWtjDUwaJiYH5
         2xtXVaM91WBCATvFp7qWvJ2xrIay/ECkonTHVSUzuOQIjOohgyqQUbnxJ7GGwkRGXJu5
         uZfSsC0tJuGua4WYMctC/SRChW6cX7FxZc2K81AWo8LQj+m5sTuDtKhuEJp2ewF+Z6Ef
         Jn/MIMoP6Jgi24Etk6GNUP0RtAVuXS0Bk3bSeRDlvc8HZf8lOCby7pq71abc1LiTSebX
         86AA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tK6J0uMPrWiL3UKMbyp3dZqiWIZX1004JZ7G1kKqQIqk+gVqsIliw5+MM0DkaemAEOUtPJ0MAVWXdka3g==
X-Received: by 10.157.12.246 with SMTP id o51mr10164367otd.72.1465892912772;
 Tue, 14 Jun 2016 01:28:32 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-musl@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-musl+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-musl+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-musl+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo musl list <gentoo-musl.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-musl@gentoo.org
X-BeenThere: gentoo-musl@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.202.63.212 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 01:28:32 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20160614081043.GA364@nyan>
References: <CAOYuCc2iavSmy2Pqy5pv8TOxguSYNMPk7wZCG10_9QghfK6TSA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20160614081043.GA364@nyan>
From: Lei Zhang <zhanglei.april@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 16:28:32 +0800
Message-ID: <CAOYuCc1zBZDNJhgXSG0ehaasJ6t5GhuaFHPbrKdvx7Ft11=LAw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-musl] [GSoC] _GNU_SOURCE in C++
To: Felix Janda <felix.janda@posteo.de>
Cc: Luca Barbato <lu_zero@gentoo.org>, gentoo-musl@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: 67d06392-d2c3-48c5-b6e2-c7547c40273e
X-Archives-Hash: 332c558849142f462c84847d2d61a3e0

2016-06-14 16:10 GMT+08:00 Felix Janda <felix.janda@posteo.de>:
> Take a look at the discussion at
>
> http://www.openwall.com/lists/musl/2014/04/15/3

And some view from the LLVM side:

http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.compilers.clang.devel/46390

IMHO, the real problem is the abuse of _GNU_SOURCE by C++ compiler.
The decisions made by LLVM and musl both look reasonable to me.


Lei