From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-musl+bounces-119-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2CF21382B5
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 12:41:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 93B54E08F7;
Tue, 14 Jun 2016 12:41:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-oi0-f51.google.com (mail-oi0-f51.google.com [209.85.218.51])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E0DEE08F7
for <gentoo-musl@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 12:41:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-oi0-f51.google.com with SMTP id u201so126713265oie.0
for <gentoo-musl@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 05:41:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=tW8iiZUQcMv0a0BOy5DEqFmut+4Mf1uGZOB06PdKvOA=;
b=oHlMZEpm7Mn3PC6i87zUXyAawPqZrVW+igYtRjfMUjrtO5SKBL8s+P6qmERNKQLiOM
iLE8hZ+r97WaAYxhjlWrIzTq0aKUK1JVZu0KubFVl4ykhFn1idOthgfWubpE4ci30iDW
cdIyjtfyxTzm/u/SmPpf/kBB47RjHn9wgZ4Jz33JUlUNGnFwjLetDtZBCvInXjH3IvLx
yugmvRBrH5VMrqvyMOZL5ubnmoCIFcCQ7hspH3o4vkHDfCOl8gQEmSFrm6zQtnkmOgmM
5WUTWWrAWgrDHQ7dY24tMufDQFg9piRLDrhF7aDb4F4Wephgd2paZ6VC8ZjV/gLYP2e6
m2PA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=tW8iiZUQcMv0a0BOy5DEqFmut+4Mf1uGZOB06PdKvOA=;
b=gxf0FLxlmDCJCeiBb8lDQ9oON8LC3qsKNTlEr82nWDjGb9O7fw/ezaWXoRXKe0+jEb
29toF6o7sCx1QG0G3r7YAMPU3WXbr8YW+GTWgL/HHwJCOBsbUiUFdr0sJ4nyeVBgyUeo
fZqMJV0/1dyxsbKFC/vcbA/UDJQ6URnQlrZ8Ma9wwM56z7k0ks220t7CE4Q75IdYgAEI
sb7Ip6Fp4bRqoeQq6Hr99e0n/hh3eKcNbVZZqfe0l/yVV9/52sPxpEJLGqOfhYXM3yNq
UB9jZqeJP75++LbmQNPh1+VCuAkpYVVFh8CMxkFF1GCcJd9z+4Jqo+VrtYPGiMbkG8rB
LanQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tI8hIQKWE2A3+ZjfA/PuU/5y4F++joAfXiorTixYFehp1LasUS6IWgeyYM39wfYGgwxMI+WX8xWFTqdwQ==
X-Received: by 10.202.96.68 with SMTP id u65mr9376054oib.83.1465908111323;
Tue, 14 Jun 2016 05:41:51 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-musl@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-musl+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-musl+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-musl+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo musl list <gentoo-musl.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-musl@gentoo.org
X-BeenThere: gentoo-musl@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.202.63.212 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 05:41:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: Lei Zhang <zhanglei.april@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 20:41:50 +0800
Message-ID: <CAOYuCc1j2fVP7Rbfn2E+j1w9vQAhCkWW79W90tL6-u+gPPbD4A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: [gentoo-musl] [GSoC] Native-clang: daily report 06/14
To: Luca Barbato <lu_zero@gentoo.org>, soc-admins@gentoo.org, gentoo-musl@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: 8dcad368-6128-40e1-802e-85de1c862e28
X-Archives-Hash: ef10e273f634b64f859280449d134099
Plan for today:
- prepare a patch for LLVM to be built against musl
Progress today:
- study how to solve the incompatibility between LLVM and musl
After some investigation and discussions in mailing lists, now I think
a better approach is not to patch LLVM, but to patch clang and libc++.
First I should make libc++ work without _GNU_SOURCE, then stop clang
from pouring _GNU_SOURCE out when using libc++.
Plan for tomorrow:
- prepare patches for libc++ and clang respectively
Lei