From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48B09139694 for ; Sat, 1 Jul 2017 03:16:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8BBA9234005; Sat, 1 Jul 2017 03:16:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FEAE234005 for ; Sat, 1 Jul 2017 03:16:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from Anthonys-MacBook-Pro.local (cpe-67-247-195-186.buffalo.res.rr.com [67.247.195.186]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: blueness) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EF3AE3417C6 for ; Sat, 1 Jul 2017 03:16:49 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-musl] Re: plan9port build fails on multiple levels. To: gentoo-musl@lists.gentoo.org References: <20170630070248.GA4311@fq> <874cacfc-b5d3-6334-73cc-b3d9375e532c@freeharbor.net> From: "Anthony G. Basile" Message-ID: <288f8497-48d6-49c6-aa65-f7c480dc2aba@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 23:16:47 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo musl list X-BeenThere: gentoo-musl@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-musl@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: c842493f-0da8-4656-ba1e-26fb9eb865f4 X-Archives-Hash: 6858838ba92bc4a696772e4abd7a3874 On 6/30/17 5:14 PM, Rendov Norra wrote: > I've attached the patches here, but I hesitate to present them as a > solution since I'm incapable of testing them because of the segfaults > I'm experiencing with egrep. > > I'll also note that the version > (e78ed7a67bbaa37dc57dfb37219f505c48755e14) is 3 years old. One big fix > that happened since then is the change of some files' extensions for > .C to .c, since they don't compile as .C . > > As for why I'm interested in p9p, it's a feasible replacement base > system in place of GNU--being small but still functional--, and sam > and acme are useful editors. > > On 6/30/17, Anthony G. Basile wrote: >> On 6/30/17 3:02 AM, parazyd@dyne.org wrote: >>> Do share them. plan9port doesn't compile on amd64 either. >>> >>> On Thu, 29 Jun 2017, Rendov Norra wrote: >>> >>>> I have patches to fix the first two issues (or at least they compile), >>>> but they're very hacky as I'm not an experienced coder. >> >> Excellent, ignore my last message. If you open a bug report at >> bugs.gentoo.org, describe the problem and upload the patches and I'll >> put it on the tree. I also maintain plan9port so I can fix it directly. >> >> Having said that, I'm curious why people are interested in plan9port? >> >>>> >>>> On 6/29/17, Rendov Norra wrote: >>>>> I should also note that this is on ARM >>>>> >>>>> On 6/29/17, Rendov Norra wrote: >>>>>> It fails at building its thread library, it fails at building >>>>>> lib9/dirread, and I'm not sure if this is related at all but egrep >>>>>> segfaults and kills the build. >>>>>> >> >> -- >> Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D. >> Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened] >> E-Mail : basile@freeharbor.net >> GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA >> GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA >> >> >> I don't understand patch 2. It eliminated an entire function which is exposed for arm, so I don't see how that can be right. Can you talk to upstream about these. -- Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D. Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened] E-Mail : blueness@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA