Re: [gentoo-musl] Re: plan9port build fails on multiple levels.

["Anthony G. Basile" <blueness@gentoo.org>]

On 6/30/17 5:14 PM, Rendov Norra wrote:
> I've attached the patches here, but I hesitate to present them as a
> solution since I'm incapable of testing them because of the segfaults
> I'm experiencing with egrep.
> 
> I'll also note that the version
> (e78ed7a67bbaa37dc57dfb37219f505c48755e14) is 3 years old. One big fix
> that happened since then is the change of some files' extensions for
> .C to .c, since they don't compile as .C .
> 
> As for why I'm interested in p9p, it's a feasible replacement base
> system in place of GNU--being small but still functional--, and sam
> and acme are useful editors.
> 
> On 6/30/17, Anthony G. Basile <basile@freeharbor.net> wrote:
>> On 6/30/17 3:02 AM, parazyd@dyne.org wrote:
>>> Do share them. plan9port doesn't compile on amd64 either.
>>>
>>> On Thu, 29 Jun 2017, Rendov Norra wrote:
>>>
>>>> I have patches to fix the first two issues (or at least they compile),
>>>> but they're very hacky as I'm not an experienced coder.
>>
>> Excellent, ignore my last message.  If you open a bug report at
>> bugs.gentoo.org, describe the problem and upload the patches and I'll
>> put it on the tree.  I also maintain plan9port so I can fix it directly.
>>
>> Having said that, I'm curious why people are interested in plan9port?
>>
>>>>
>>>> On 6/29/17, Rendov Norra <tsobf242@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> I should also note that this is on ARM
>>>>>
>>>>> On 6/29/17, Rendov Norra <tsobf242@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> It fails at building its thread library, it fails at building
>>>>>> lib9/dirread, and I'm not sure if this is related at all but egrep
>>>>>> segfaults and kills the build.
>>>>>>
>>
>> --
>> Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
>> Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
>> E-Mail    : basile@freeharbor.net
>> GnuPG FP  : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB  DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA
>> GnuPG ID  : F52D4BBA
>>
>>
>>

I don't understand patch 2.  It eliminated an entire function which is
exposed for arm, so I don't see how that can be right.  Can you talk to
upstream about these.

-- 
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail    : blueness@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP  : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB  DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA
GnuPG ID  : F52D4BBA