From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E3ITw-0007B7-UH for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 19:12:49 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j7BJBFmf031331; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 19:11:15 GMT Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.200]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7BJBEa4004316 for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 19:11:15 GMT Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so363660rng for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 12:12:05 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Bg6f5fIKhckmNOmVBHYDcp4hpVAWaPjThy03Nl+m2UdF2M4IS1KG3EHnL2pXXeV2KyRVFIOutqoe6+MXWWCuaBvtZjZsMcx+5gXJhkWFeeoMjH7M/6utUKThQwFGBHAv/Pu5H4ZA2pROmQAl5jBpweAPuxox04RgQDpkjk12SAs= Received: by 10.38.98.5 with SMTP id v5mr756544rnb; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 12:12:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.39.1.62 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 12:12:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 15:12:05 -0400 From: David Cummings To: gentoo-mips@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-mips] shmem In-Reply-To: <430B082C@zathras> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-mips@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-mips@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline References: <430B082C@zathras> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by robin.gentoo.org id j7BJBEa4004316 X-Archives-Salt: 4e94ab87-95ba-43c0-b7e8-976e5db774c7 X-Archives-Hash: 0b6331b223cd34b06579f7d1226dabfa On 8/11/05, spbecker wrote: > >This is n32. I recall at least one of the apps working with o32. What > >would be the issue with n32? > > How many warnings have you ignored so far about using n32? I've lost count by > now. I've sent at least 3 or 4 to the list, and I know hardave has warned you > also. > > Seriously, n32 doesn't work properly yet. It has major bugs and really should > not be used by anyone but developers. We aren't supporting n32 until these > problems have been worked out, and that may be a long time yet. That is all. > > -Steve > > -- > gentoo-mips@gentoo.org mailing list > > Great, thanks again for being extraordinarily helpful. Why do you think I keep asking questions? because I like being told something is broken? I want to get this thing working, and I am more than happy to help out the effort. If no one will tell me what the problem is, then I'm going to have a hard time fixing it. here, ready? I hereby claim myself as a developer, now will you stop belittling me? I may not know all that much about the problems here, but I've got time and energy and I can easily put it someplace else. -Dave -- The way that can be named is not the Way. -- gentoo-mips@gentoo.org mailing list