From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62)
(envelope-from <gentoo-mips+bounces-251-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
id 1HFeGU-000255-Jo
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 22:30:47 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l19MUSoU023746;
Fri, 9 Feb 2007 22:30:28 GMT
Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.224])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l19MUO3s023736
for <gentoo-mips@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 9 Feb 2007 22:30:24 GMT
Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i30so1601888wxd
for <gentoo-mips@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 14:30:23 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=beta;
h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
b=GuHfTEh4Mf8SJT4OjSrCTyjiWD3NRBaUzPftTIi2fCQuIOJvXp8vWsUi4o6lGoYlYS8MzDWUoDGIWK9K0xqt6WW/3iCner1JuHjHWyeXoJpKIcJ6bjTdV4CIlZoYQafPNrZprpHfPQ1vK87J7Q8jVKd7AMlFhx+88jE7mhEvdfU=
Received: by 10.90.88.13 with SMTP id l13mr13523013agb.1171060223775;
Fri, 09 Feb 2007 14:30:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.90.119.4 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Feb 2007 14:30:23 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <a728f9f90702091430p259e1c01lca9e40b8820e1ee7@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 17:30:23 -0500
From: "Alex Deucher" <alexdeucher@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-mips@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-mips] JFS on non-intel [ Was O2 Sound and Misc Stuff]
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702091557140.26254@bluefang.tetracon-eng.net>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-mips@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-mips+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-mips+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-mips+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-mips.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-mips@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-mips@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <Pine.SGI.4.62.0701181319170.2314@morpheus.tetracon-eng.net>
<45B4C1D5.2040905@gentoo.org>
<Pine.LNX.4.64.0701300843310.15883@bluefang.tetracon-eng.net>
<45CC1ABA.2070900@gentoo.org>
<Pine.LNX.4.64.0702090831570.24163@bluefang.tetracon-eng.net>
<a728f9f90702090921w9ec256ege12b9edf7c5d0b7d@mail.gmail.com>
<Pine.LNX.4.64.0702091315390.21234@bluefang.tetracon-eng.net>
<a728f9f90702091105g11f5439bp94f0f0367632b3bd@mail.gmail.com>
<Pine.LNX.4.64.0702091557140.26254@bluefang.tetracon-eng.net>
X-Archives-Salt: 65dacd91-68cb-4af2-b548-d8154c2efc98
X-Archives-Hash: 83aeb445fab56ac67f577852de7c466d
On 2/9/07, J. Scott Kasten <jscottkasten@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Alex, thanks. I read through it in detail. That finally triggered my
> memory. There were multiple issues that affected 2.6.12 - 2.6.14.
>
> In your case, it probably wasn't JFS specifically, but most likely an
> interaction between JFS and the LVM layer. I never tried that feature.
> This affected 2.6.12 and 2.6.13
>
> http://www.arcknowledge.com/gmane.comp.file-systems.jfs.general/2005-10/msg00020.html
>
> Here is also an interesting LWN article about the 4k page issue that came
> out at the same time and how it affected device_mapper, LVM and such
> things. (See the second section.)
>
> http://lwn.net/Articles/149977/
>
> Here's a complaint about 2.6.13 and 2.6.14 on AMD with ext3. This is just
> an example of other complaints that were comming in.
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/09/27/62
>
> In short, there were multiple sources of corruption at that time and you
> could have been bitten by any of them. Hopefully things are more settled
> now, but I certainly will watch out for any issues.
Thanks for the update! those indeed look like they may have been the
cause of my problems. Too bad I can't test that set up again to see
if it works today.
Alex
>
> -S-
>
> On Fri, 9 Feb 2007, Alex Deucher wrote:
>
> > On 2/9/07, J. Scott Kasten <jscottkasten@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm interested in your data point. Do you happen to remember about which
> >> kernel that was? There was some general badness that affected multiple
> >> file systems in late 2.6.13 on into 2.6.14 or so in the way that you
> >> describe. Not sure they ever really knew what the smoking gun was.
> >
> > http: //sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=7852301&forum_id=43911
> > http: //www.mail-archive.com/sparclinux@vger.kernel.org/msg00333.html
> >
> > Alex
> >
> --
> gentoo-mips@gentoo.org mailing list
>
>
--
gentoo-mips@gentoo.org mailing list