From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HFeGU-000255-Jo for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 22:30:47 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l19MUSoU023746; Fri, 9 Feb 2007 22:30:28 GMT Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.224]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l19MUO3s023736 for ; Fri, 9 Feb 2007 22:30:24 GMT Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i30so1601888wxd for ; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 14:30:23 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=GuHfTEh4Mf8SJT4OjSrCTyjiWD3NRBaUzPftTIi2fCQuIOJvXp8vWsUi4o6lGoYlYS8MzDWUoDGIWK9K0xqt6WW/3iCner1JuHjHWyeXoJpKIcJ6bjTdV4CIlZoYQafPNrZprpHfPQ1vK87J7Q8jVKd7AMlFhx+88jE7mhEvdfU= Received: by 10.90.88.13 with SMTP id l13mr13523013agb.1171060223775; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 14:30:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.90.119.4 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Feb 2007 14:30:23 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 17:30:23 -0500 From: "Alex Deucher" To: gentoo-mips@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-mips] JFS on non-intel [ Was O2 Sound and Misc Stuff] In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-mips@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-mips@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <45B4C1D5.2040905@gentoo.org> <45CC1ABA.2070900@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 65dacd91-68cb-4af2-b548-d8154c2efc98 X-Archives-Hash: 83aeb445fab56ac67f577852de7c466d On 2/9/07, J. Scott Kasten wrote: > > Alex, thanks. I read through it in detail. That finally triggered my > memory. There were multiple issues that affected 2.6.12 - 2.6.14. > > In your case, it probably wasn't JFS specifically, but most likely an > interaction between JFS and the LVM layer. I never tried that feature. > This affected 2.6.12 and 2.6.13 > > http://www.arcknowledge.com/gmane.comp.file-systems.jfs.general/2005-10/msg00020.html > > Here is also an interesting LWN article about the 4k page issue that came > out at the same time and how it affected device_mapper, LVM and such > things. (See the second section.) > > http://lwn.net/Articles/149977/ > > Here's a complaint about 2.6.13 and 2.6.14 on AMD with ext3. This is just > an example of other complaints that were comming in. > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/09/27/62 > > In short, there were multiple sources of corruption at that time and you > could have been bitten by any of them. Hopefully things are more settled > now, but I certainly will watch out for any issues. Thanks for the update! those indeed look like they may have been the cause of my problems. Too bad I can't test that set up again to see if it works today. Alex > > -S- > > On Fri, 9 Feb 2007, Alex Deucher wrote: > > > On 2/9/07, J. Scott Kasten wrote: > >> > >> I'm interested in your data point. Do you happen to remember about which > >> kernel that was? There was some general badness that affected multiple > >> file systems in late 2.6.13 on into 2.6.14 or so in the way that you > >> describe. Not sure they ever really knew what the smoking gun was. > > > > http: //sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=7852301&forum_id=43911 > > http: //www.mail-archive.com/sparclinux@vger.kernel.org/msg00333.html > > > > Alex > > > -- > gentoo-mips@gentoo.org mailing list > > -- gentoo-mips@gentoo.org mailing list