From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-mips+bounces-455-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 086AC1381FA
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon,  5 May 2014 23:31:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 913B2E0B8A;
	Mon,  5 May 2014 23:31:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15321E0B8A
	for <gentoo-mips@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon,  5 May 2014 23:31:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qg0-f51.google.com (mail-qg0-f51.google.com [209.85.192.51])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: mattst88)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 45774340283
	for <gentoo-mips@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon,  5 May 2014 23:31:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qg0-f51.google.com with SMTP id q107so4136262qgd.10
        for <gentoo-mips@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 05 May 2014 16:31:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.229.66.133 with SMTP id n5mr48872368qci.0.1399332665159;
 Mon, 05 May 2014 16:31:05 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-mips@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-mips+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-mips+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-mips+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-mips.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-mips@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-mips@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.244.200 with HTTP; Mon, 5 May 2014 16:30:45 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <53680A7E.9000209@gentoo.org>
References: <53679ACC.3000809@gentoo.org> <CAEdQ38FXwAdL-61br_haW-XvGP2Zv9+Q4L2qzQ1fykM7kOfftw@mail.gmail.com>
 <53680A7E.9000209@gentoo.org>
From: Matt Turner <mattst88@gentoo.org>
Date: Mon, 5 May 2014 16:30:45 -0700
Message-ID: <CAEdQ38GLOTA85huVhhHRSqMvwXctrNo+9quKpjQJcNxwzvg5gQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-mips] Reducing the number of the MIPS supported stages
To: gentoo-mips@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: 7f1aacb7-acba-426b-a7bb-a3dd5397a6c2
X-Archives-Hash: 5989fbe9bf23a4e05b384cd4fd183ed4

On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Joshua Kinard <kumba@gentoo.org> wrote:
> And I don't see a point in doing an R10K-specific mips4 build.  The standard
> mips4 build is good enough, and users of R10K systems can rebuild to gain
> the R10K enhancements if needed.

That's not true, as far as I'm aware. glibc for instance has
compile-time work-arounds for R10k errata. Hangs result without the
fix.