From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NTSUu-0003qN-Oo for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2010 04:00:20 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5E122E0771 for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2010 04:00:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ext2-chi.ldsys.net (one.ldsys.net [208.176.63.109]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EE4FE06F3 for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2010 03:36:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ext2-chi.ldsys.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3925D2013B for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2010 21:36:58 -0600 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.chi-dmz.ldsys.net Received: from ext2-chi.ldsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.chi-dmz.ldsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i9k5gDme0nIv for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2010 21:36:57 -0600 (CST) Received: from mail.chi.ldsys.net (gateway-int.chi-dmz.ldsys.net [192.168.3.253]) by ext2-chi.ldsys.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DB6920120 for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2010 21:36:57 -0600 (CST) Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 21:36:57 -0600 (CST) From: "Christopher G. Stach II" To: gentoo-mips@lists.gentoo.org Message-ID: <551933303.183.1263008217201.JavaMail.root@mail.chi.ldsys.net> In-Reply-To: <20100109005520.GA7809@atum.0x90.dk> Subject: Re: [gentoo-mips] Status of Gentoo/MIPS developers Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-mips@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-mips@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Originating-IP: [10.0.1.7] X-Mailer: Zimbra 6.0.2_GA_1912.RHEL5_64 (ZimbraWebClient - FF3.0 (Linux)/6.0.2_GA_1912.RHEL5_64) X-Archives-Salt: fe8698b9-1092-43f0-b08c-2c4e2fee6118 X-Archives-Hash: a52d30523010e551157e5e864a29fcf7 ----- "Alexander F=C3=A6r=C3=B8y" wrote: > Gentoo/MIPS has been pretty much inactive for the past years, mainly > due > to lack of time amongst the development team, but also because it's > difficult to find powerful enough hardware that allows you to get > your > job done tonight and not in fourteen days. I have an Origin 2000 sitting next to me doing nothing, so if someone wants= to develop on it they can. The only catch is that they have to pay the pow= er bill. :) --=20 Christopher G. Stach II http://ldsys.net/~cgs/