From: "Anthony G. Basile" <basile@opensource.dyc.edu>
To: gentoo-mips@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-mips] Reducing the number of the MIPS supported stages
Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 07:32:38 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5368C856.3010602@opensource.dyc.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53688A17.2070509@gentoo.org>
On 05/06/2014 03:07 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On 05/06/2014 01:09 AM, Joshua Kinard wrote:
>> On 05/05/2014 19:36, Matt Turner wrote:
>>> On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Joshua Kinard <kumba@gentoo.org> wrote:
>>>> I cannot speak for anything outside of the standard/original MIPS ISAs, but
>>>> I thought we killed off mips1 long ago. When did that come back? Almost
>>>> anything out there should be able to handle mips2 at a bare minimum (only
>>>> R2000 and R3000-based systems, like certain DECStations, would need mips1).
>>>> mips2 is also the branch point for the mips32r* ISAs, so if any of the
>>>> original, 32-bit ISAs should be kept, that would be mips2. mips1 can go.
>>>
>>> We've had this discussion before. If you're going to have >mips2
>>> stages, then there's zero reason to have mips2 stages since mips2
>>> effectively doesn't exist.
>>
>> It's been a while, but I thought we only kept a mips2 stage1 around for
>> those that wanted a baseline to build their own stage2 or stage3's from.
>> You can do this with a mips1 as well, but mips2 is, more or less, the
>> baseline from which all other possible ISAs and stages can be built from, as
>> long as you don't care about R2k or R3k CPUs. stage3's can be the higher
>> mips32r* ISAs.
>>
>> I personally don't see a point in having mips1 or mips2 stage3's, only a
>> stage1 to use as a bootstrap for new machines or ISAs.
>>
>
> (picking up a random thread)
>
> Ok thanks for the replies.
>
> Ok I think it's safe to proceed with the following:
> - Stop mips1 builds (we don't have mips2)
> - Reduce the frequency to once-a-year for mips3 and mips4. Updating
> these stages every year with catalyst will be a lot of fun ;)
>
> @kumba: You mentioned too many times that I wanted to "drop" support for
> mips3 and mips4. I never said that (I am sort-of tired keep repeating
> that). All I said (again) was to reduce the frequency or stop building
> them at all. Users can still get an existing mips3/mips4 stage3 and
> update themselves
>
mipsel3 is used for the lemote. Are you sure we should drop it?
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph. D.
Chair of Information Technology
D'Youville College
Buffalo, NY 14201
(716) 829-8197
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-06 11:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-05 14:06 [gentoo-mips] Reducing the number of the MIPS supported stages Markos Chandras
2014-05-05 17:04 ` Panagiotis Christopoulos
2014-05-05 17:17 ` Markos Chandras
2014-05-05 17:13 ` Justin Cormack
2014-05-05 17:16 ` Markos Chandras
2014-05-05 17:22 ` Matt Turner
2014-05-05 17:29 ` Markos Chandras
2014-05-05 23:34 ` Matt Turner
2014-05-05 22:02 ` Joshua Kinard
2014-05-05 23:30 ` Matt Turner
2014-05-06 0:15 ` Joshua Kinard
2014-05-05 23:36 ` Matt Turner
2014-05-06 0:09 ` Joshua Kinard
2014-05-06 7:07 ` Markos Chandras
2014-05-06 8:10 ` Joshua Kinard
2014-05-06 17:50 ` Markos Chandras
2014-05-06 21:37 ` Joshua Kinard
2014-05-07 7:06 ` Markos Chandras
2014-05-07 7:22 ` Joshua Kinard
2014-05-06 11:32 ` Anthony G. Basile [this message]
2014-05-06 17:40 ` Markos Chandras
2014-05-05 19:19 ` [gentoo-mips] " Anthony G. Basile
2014-05-05 19:33 ` Markos Chandras
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5368C856.3010602@opensource.dyc.edu \
--to=basile@opensource.dyc.edu \
--cc=gentoo-mips@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox