From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E319N-00000z-U9 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 00:42:26 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j7B0fI15004495; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 00:41:18 GMT Received: from longlandclan.hopto.org (202-47-55-78.adsl.gil.com.au [202.47.55.78]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j7B0fFud008129 for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 00:41:16 GMT Received: (qmail 12986 invoked by uid 210); 11 Aug 2005 10:41:59 +1000 Received: from 127.0.0.1 by www (envelope-from , uid 201) with qmail-scanner-1.25st (spamassassin: 3.0.2. perlscan: 1.25st. Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):. Processed in 0.089101 secs); 11 Aug 2005 00:41:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.longlandclan.hopto.org) (127.0.0.1) by 127.0.0.1 with SMTP; 11 Aug 2005 10:41:58 +1000 Received: from 131.181.46.35 (SquirrelMail authenticated user stuartl) by mail.longlandclan.hopto.org with HTTP; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 10:41:58 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <42071.131.181.46.35.1123720918.squirrel@mail.longlandclan.hopto.org> In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 10:41:58 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: [gentoo-mips] shmem From: "Stuart Longland" To: gentoo-mips@lists.gentoo.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-mips@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-mips@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-Archives-Salt: 62206ed1-380d-498c-8d1c-45688e24e8f8 X-Archives-Hash: 473e00b2ce0352e600fd399a9e5790a7 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 David Cummings said: > Hey, > I've run into a couple of programs that either when configuring or > running cannot allocate shared memory, or detect that it is available. > Is there an easy way to test whether or not it's available? should it > be mounted in a special way? Thanks for any info, my info is below. Are you still running n32? This problem could be an n32-ism with newer kernels. Are you able to reproduce this on o32? - -- : ____ _ Stuart Longland (a.k.a Redhatter) :/ \ ___ ___ __| |__ __ __ Gentoo Linux/MIPS Cobalt and Docs :- ( ) \ / \ ; \(__ __)/ \ / \ Developer : \ // O _| / /\ \ | | | /\ | /\ | : / / \ /__| / \ \ | | | \/ | \/ | :(___/ \____/|_; |_| \_/ \__/ \__/ http://dev.gentoo.org/~redhatter -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFC+p7WuarJ1mMmSrkRAhHIAJ0bcJF2/JR9hOtk4Ic3LkRrQV/aCQCfTPKw OZVhhZFjte/cwoAgTzuDHu4= =71ub -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-mips@gentoo.org mailing list