From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23AB51387B5 for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 17:40:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4B920E0B1C; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 17:40:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BE27E0B17 for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 17:40:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiot.lan (unknown [81.219.201.231]) (using SSLv3 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 736B833F9DC; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 14:40:13 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 15:38:22 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: gentoo-mips@lists.gentoo.org Cc: blueness@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-mips] On MIPS using the same CHOST for all multilib ABIs Message-ID: <20140122153822.278588a9@pomiot.lan> In-Reply-To: <52DFD4B7.8060306@gentoo.org> References: <20131228235839.5bb0305a@gentoo.org> <20140116210119.421c952c@pomiot.lan> <52D84994.3070306@opensource.dyc.edu> <20140116222418.6229a1b0@pomiot.lan> <52D85D57.9010500@gentoo.org> <20140117054718.5f948b88@pomiot.lan> <52D9746E.4020200@gentoo.org> <20140117195154.4b512793@pomiot.lan> <52D98807.2060201@gentoo.org> <52DFD4B7.8060306@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.22; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-mips@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-mips@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/e3JetnbaFNuzoSLMROX46Q/"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: b0d244a5-8be2-42bb-8f5c-5609341e1445 X-Archives-Hash: 14339108d6da37bbe7a659eb68f06d04 --Sig_/e3JetnbaFNuzoSLMROX46Q/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dnia 2014-01-22, o godz. 09:24:55 "Anthony G. Basile" napisa=C5=82(a): > 4) The debian debate about departing from GNU tuples (aka triplets) is he= re: >=20 > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D664257 > https://wiki.debian.org/Multiarch/Tuples > https://wiki.debian.org/Multiarch/TuplesAbandoned >=20 > Their reasons are different than ours. The concern was over=20 > i386/486/585/686 inconsistencies and arm hard/soft float. Regarding the= =20 > later issue, gcc upstream suggested using the vendor field which is what= =20 > we do for hard/soft arm. >=20 > 5) My recommendation is that the safest thing is to use the vendor field= =20 > since it is recognized as "arbitrary". [...] Well, considering that it will fix the underlying issue, you have my blessing :). If you are going to put 'gentoo' there somehow, even +2. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/e3JetnbaFNuzoSLMROX46Q/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJS39fhXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2REJCMDdDQzRGMERBRDA2RUEwQUZFNDFC MDdBMUFFQUVGQjQ0NjRFAAoJELB6GurvtEZOS70QAJe2x7Ani3+kXTJwUOmvYGi7 dfsJzw+CEHalzRT1SF7A45PuOlYufh6ltajtHWwPw1InwHzC7Lsc13RV9a+xPgfi SWHE6ckVTyvj1VjDbXJaHoad029U2aqF/At40KtpDpEnpnvJ5jqKI3tsvBCQ47FV 3iqe85OOM9eKPdXDskuqssQeKmJf+2U+BRBqm1E/qCwUVdPXWTuNPZNPbIB5YzLD fsw8IzYm8lcyig7FSOsfymJebFrggjSxNb6OAgmLho7SSUkc+rHBRgdXhqKCUtUH 2y9ydB36FmcNwAdN4oSmtaNOjph1LYZgVxqVr8QJ+JAu86i3hi+jL3YvnkqvhTI2 sGQYO6C5xZ1x2Lk+uD1ksTLFhhhCLojRK7YPqdWdFy/IJ7Za8oYerfom7vuq8hDy mMVUL6GBiqxjkR2gBk/4868LP8I6l7eCOtJFdwJDOMDZxfQ1IYRS2qtTi1XgpGRp dGE0/wc/JiXcO8o4RTHXnYe/xAeAqy5YFhR1D3TRG7y2xfzoRv4mQdH4QJtxGkaP Pq81YoPljpog0Xqbef/L97+1tv8jIYycbtnfxWrwvSTUSPP3pHINLuDhn4zIEOip OBjwwWnzj5i9krafnI2We2ypksa3z1YcsTpfvdUUo6Ieh8Dn0LBIPQfQIIkXPgdv ha8GDFzoSQwtUWXbimmF =whlc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/e3JetnbaFNuzoSLMROX46Q/--