From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC7DB13827E for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 10:23:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 736C2E0BD3; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 10:23:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpbox.inp.nsk.su (inpbox.inp.nsk.su [84.237.43.120]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9C4EE0BD3 for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 10:23:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from star.inp.nsk.su ([192.168.167.122]) by inpbox.inp.nsk.su with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VqKTS-0002gn-FX for gentoo-lisp@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 17:23:30 +0700 Received: from star.inp.nsk.su (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by star.inp.nsk.su (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id rBAANUHW012965 for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 17:23:30 +0700 Received: from localhost (grozin@localhost) by star.inp.nsk.su (8.14.7/8.14.6/Submit) with ESMTP id rBAANT9N012962 for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 17:23:30 +0700 X-Authentication-Warning: star.inp.nsk.su: grozin owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 17:23:29 +0700 (NOVT) From: grozin@gentoo.org X-X-Sender: grozin@star.inp.nsk.su To: gentoo-lisp@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-lisp] Stabilization of last versions of sbcl and asdf on amd64 In-Reply-To: <20131210092612.GA7274@filladhoo> Message-ID: References: <20131209153357.GA29832@filladhoo> <20131210092612.GA7274@filladhoo> User-Agent: Alpine 2.03 (LFD 1266 2009-07-14) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Lisp mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-lisp@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-lisp@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Archives-Salt: 82c64f1c-058d-407f-aeb8-b2d3b33b5aab X-Archives-Hash: db7b85e4c4a47d03bb994f5021793fd2 On Tue, 10 Dec 2013, Chema Alonso wrote: > I tested it on an stable amd64 system, no problems found apart from some > 'cosmetic' warnings found by repoman: > > ebuild.minorsyn 12 > dev-lisp/sbcl/sbcl-1.0.55-r1.ebuild: Ebuild contains leading spaces on line: 50 > dev-lisp/sbcl/sbcl-1.0.55-r1.ebuild: Ebuild contains leading spaces on line: 62 > dev-lisp/sbcl/sbcl-1.0.55-r2.ebuild: Ebuild contains leading spaces on line: 51 > dev-lisp/sbcl/sbcl-1.0.55-r2.ebuild: Ebuild contains leading spaces on line: 64 > dev-lisp/sbcl/sbcl-1.1.10.ebuild: Ebuild contains leading spaces on line: 57 > dev-lisp/sbcl/sbcl-1.1.10.ebuild: Ebuild contains leading spaces on line: 70 > dev-lisp/sbcl/sbcl-1.1.11.ebuild: Ebuild contains leading spaces on line: 57 > dev-lisp/sbcl/sbcl-1.1.11.ebuild: Ebuild contains leading spaces on line: 70 > dev-lisp/sbcl/sbcl-1.1.12.ebuild: Ebuild contains leading spaces on line: 57 > dev-lisp/sbcl/sbcl-1.1.12.ebuild: Ebuild contains leading spaces on line: 70 > dev-lisp/sbcl/sbcl-1.1.14.ebuild: Ebuild contains leading spaces on line: 56 > dev-lisp/sbcl/sbcl-1.1.14.ebuild: Ebuild contains leading spaces on line: 69 > > These are easy to fix though =) > > Will you take care of them? These lines are not in the ebuilds proper, but in lisp code embedded into ebuilds. I think it makes no sense to fix them. Andrey