From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-lisp+bounces-181-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1Q9p8v-00052l-L1
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 01:45:17 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DE3021C024;
Wed, 13 Apr 2011 01:45:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-vw0-f53.google.com (mail-vw0-f53.google.com [209.85.212.53])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6A5D1C024
for <gentoo-lisp@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 13 Apr 2011 01:45:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by vws13 with SMTP id 13so164415vws.40
for <gentoo-lisp@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 18:45:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=dqB99khDDiIM9pTTlCFIxCuKBT+ctuPdLSIyNhB84aI=;
b=W/sJ+P96qJimy9AdtIINuXWbSe8Zq6ogyIXuDKokwFPPX6att8csq3CJVjdmrr9slX
oOTjglQldybu35MA5aNUwuZddYsf+Hw8mWVf4mHpVCrNQYINCzoSdqiq0DQkhQm0iBQk
b9pLEue5ANF7EW3i/+v/nKLD/OXdaJ+2kBxhA=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
b=aFJ7HhyTKk9l8kn8c7kmeYhP75VxbdZeKLmc8QtGpR21Qc7ckE4aOSCdIRAwK+rJX7
xO7xvIwUZnpbmsOkKhb5PRJQqcpvZ3yVnQ4gkFFNcVw6IA9OmUCDde3XnQPnqtSNjIZ2
195x7B35ZJH3iupywHtejiKExKYfKAMdvy8/Y=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-lisp@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-lisp+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-lisp+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-lisp+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Lisp mail <gentoo-lisp.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-lisp@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.0.136 with SMTP id 8mr7672210vde.45.1302659104918; Tue, 12
Apr 2011 18:45:04 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: is.rafique@gmail.com
Received: by 10.52.157.170 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 18:45:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4DA40E24.1090308@gentoo.org>
References: <BANLkTinXS8uT9Dj0vTsP2n3A143j2KTO_w@mail.gmail.com>
<4DA40E24.1090308@gentoo.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 01:45:04 +0000
X-Google-Sender-Auth: BKp8jMjDH2D0C3WGqn2L0KBkx4E
Message-ID: <BANLkTinRAm=CwVTsiCL69uhwwoB_vQmB-w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-lisp] vim with embedded racket
From: Imran Rafique <imran@rafique.org>
To: Marijn <hkBst@gentoo.org>
Cc: gentoo-lisp@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt:
X-Archives-Hash: 7023df626b1843d23a309d9b78c9edb2
Will do. But there's one issue. I needed to replace /usr/bin/mzscheme
with a symlink to /usr/bin/racket.
Racket-5.1 (from this overlay) installs a /usr/bin/mzscheme binary in
addition to /usr/bin/racket. Seems like some useless leftover artifact
('racket' provides the repl, 'mzscheme' segfaults)
Vim-7.3 was released when racket was still plt-scheme, and it
specifically looked for the mzscheme binary. vim-7.3.049 updated the
scheme support to work with racket, but vim still looks for
'/usr/bin/mzscheme' and uses it (sure, thats an upstream issue, but
its what we have right now).
Replacing /usr/bin/mzscheme with a symlink to /usr/bin/racket sorted
that issue out, but this really needs to be something which the racket
ebuild itself resolves (whats that mzscheme binary for, anyway?)
--
Regards,
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Imran Rafique
(skype: imran_rafique)
On 12 April 2011 08:32, Marijn <hkBst@gentoo.org> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi Imran,
>
> On 04/12/11 04:43, Imran Rafique wrote:
>> Gentoo-lispers,
>>
>> Currently, vim support for embedded racket is disabled in
>> eclass/vim.eclass. I have patched this in my local overlay to add
>> support for both racket (and tcl). As dev-scheme/racket is itself not
>> part of the standard portage tree, I thought it might not make sense
>> to create a new bug to amend the standard vim.eclass. Would it be
>> better to just add the amended vim.eclass to the gentoo-lisp overlay
>> instead?
>
> Racket is on its way to main tree.
>
>> If so, then should I just send the patch to this list, or create a
>> bugzilla bug with some gentoo-lisp specific info?
>
> You can create a bug and have it depend on the bug about getting racket
> in main tree (324161).
>
> Marijn
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAk2kDiQACgkQp/VmCx0OL2zQGgCgnL2JgCNjURprwWXP/FnjU7GO
> FgoAn08AiN0VVgnjnYVwcP/4mXlxxxqf
> =3DfNOW
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>