From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-lisp+bounces-123-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1NU2wD-0001so-EE
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 18:55:05 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7FB65E05AF;
	Sun, 10 Jan 2010 18:54:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.skyhub.de (mail.skyhub.de [78.46.96.112])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49B0BE05AF
	for <gentoo-lisp@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 18:54:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTP id 74D721D9DFE
	for <gentoo-lisp@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 19:54:47 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=alien8.de; s=alien8;
	t=1263149687; bh=8ETTHW8j3SxwKcD7vlhtEDWumkS4A96HJSOfmCUzo/4=;
	h=From:To:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:
	 MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=DG/AtxSMrdjcxFhMfEjAheHOyI74pvAfgDwX5
	h28eTsvIZseixVBKgksltoczK68qE2c3k9HOuyVj/8AUmB97cKcm2BAwvfhFnfhcNEo
	Cd8MHggAqkb8uWDUsB7/qu2AqnNNkubqof+piZ0C//BYmd3ZLytxacBySU4SvoHkByg
	=
X-Virus-Scanned: Nedap ESD1 at mail.skyhub.de
Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (door.skyhub.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026)
	with ESMTP id gOZNStIxJzcY for <gentoo-lisp@lists.gentoo.org>;
	Sun, 10 Jan 2010 19:54:47 +0100 (CET)
Received: from tabernacle.localnet (unknown [IPv6:2001:6f8:10f6:200:21b:77ff:fe41:11ab])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 112AA1D9DFC
	for <gentoo-lisp@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 10 Jan 2010 19:54:47 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=alien8.de; s=alien8;
	t=1263149687; bh=8ETTHW8j3SxwKcD7vlhtEDWumkS4A96HJSOfmCUzo/4=;
	h=From:To:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:
	 MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=DG/AtxSMrdjcxFhMfEjAheHOyI74pvAfgDwX5
	h28eTsvIZseixVBKgksltoczK68qE2c3k9HOuyVj/8AUmB97cKcm2BAwvfhFnfhcNEo
	Cd8MHggAqkb8uWDUsB7/qu2AqnNNkubqof+piZ0C//BYmd3ZLytxacBySU4SvoHkByg
	=
From: Julian Stecklina <js@alien8.de>
To: gentoo-lisp@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-lisp] stabilization of ecls-9.12.3 and clozurecl-1.4
References: <alpine.LRH.1.10.1001101559300.18424@star.inp.nsk.su>
	<alpine.LRH.1.10.1001101627060.18920@star.inp.nsk.su>
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 19:54:46 +0100
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.1.10.1001101627060.18920@star.inp.nsk.su> (Andrey
	G. Grozin's message of "Sun, 10 Jan 2010 16:29:01 +0600 (NOVT)")
Message-ID: <87pr5hx021.fsf@tabernacle.localhost>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-lisp@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-lisp+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-lisp+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-lisp+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Lisp mail <gentoo-lisp.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-lisp@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Archives-Salt: 7c56a8bb-22cb-440d-8fcf-a327dd3bce6e
X-Archives-Hash: 46de879a3917c40c49ba4ca8309ef227

"Andrey G. Grozin" <A.G.Grozin@inp.nsk.su> writes:

> And what about removing openmcl from the tree (it became clozurecl)?

ClozureCL 1.4 works fine for me on x86 and ECL 9.12.* is better than
most of the preceding versions. ;) So I am all for stabilizing them.

Regards,
-- 
Julian Stecklina

The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck is probably the day
they start making vacuum cleaners - Ernst Jan Plugge