From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-lisp+bounces-163-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1PrpYS-0001Sk-0f
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 10:33:16 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 76C2D1C017;
Tue, 22 Feb 2011 10:33:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-bw0-f51.google.com (mail-bw0-f51.google.com [209.85.214.51])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 202691C017
for <gentoo-lisp@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 10:33:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by bwz10 with SMTP id 10so3057776bwz.10
for <gentoo-lisp@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 22 Feb 2011 02:33:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to
:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=DiaenO/U8kwQRSwzFuMxILu1bRYxLrAUw96u82VLvs0=;
b=UssJ6mc81d/aDgC0C8FDpyvW0oK05f12bCarTyy9MagSoPmFggAldP/VXvQjz+L0DQ
JXWwCQEt+ROOAwA84p8q03fqGG2Sv5P8PLMCxa80x/qJxhnq05heGNejoiSqwX+G88+Q
9jftU/PVUPv5jIVxJKduD/ZIeHyfUkilXm/mQ=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject
:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
b=lo3PN+SupMDdQmsz8HE3DSPvRbYGfWoNQJlTNX2kaca0r+HGMZ3X+X+pQu96/E76j8
72CAWTJKLxGfG4iYL+GnLtx78XtIb/NTgP2S0YOKYP2EGHGpldGegEIUm5vIMaz44dDT
l7DoU8PWUsThDCON/Wb0p6EmgOaL7ACUzgXeo=
Received: by 10.204.121.138 with SMTP id h10mr2324265bkr.40.1298370781251;
Tue, 22 Feb 2011 02:33:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [138.96.193.83] (sita.inria.fr [138.96.193.83])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a17sm4394991bku.11.2011.02.22.02.33.00
(version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Tue, 22 Feb 2011 02:33:00 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4D6390DA.6090706@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:32:58 +0100
From: Cyprien Nicolas <c.nicolas@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:2.0b10pre) Gecko/20110204 Thunderbird/3.3a2
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-lisp@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-lisp+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-lisp+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-lisp+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Lisp mail <gentoo-lisp.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-lisp@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Morgon Kanter <morgon.kanter@gmail.com>
CC: gentoo-lisp@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-lisp] Ebuild for Racket 5.1
References: <AANLkTin-HS0qCw83xg3T80vQ3eYfoS-_a3LfaQqg9e8k@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTin-HS0qCw83xg3T80vQ3eYfoS-_a3LfaQqg9e8k@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt:
X-Archives-Hash: fb949dc58730abb1cd29bbc945fa86bf
On 21/02/11 18:07, Morgon Kanter wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> I noticed there wasn't yet an ebuild for the new version of Racket, so
> I went ahead and made one. It's attached.
>
> A couple changes besides just bumping the version number:
> * Doesn't really seem like that makefile patch was required anymore (I
> didn't need it), so I commented that out.
> * The new Racket GUI system doesn't appear to include any of those
> external libraries that the ebuild used to issue an "rm" for, so I
> removed those bits from the ebuild (as well as the formerly
> commented-out rm commands that were replaced by something different).
>
> That's it for the changes, aside from a version bump.
>
> Thanks,
> -- Morgon
Actually, there is a work-in-progress ebuild, but I didn't had the time
to test it intensively, especially with the cgc and sgc garbage
collectors, and the plain USE flags (as the makefile patch is related to
those USEs), and I just it an "emake failed" with USE=plain.
Apart from some cosmetic changes (EAPI4, REAUIRED_USE="cgc? ( !sgc )",
some spacing) my ebuild is the same :)
May I ask you which USE flags combination(s) you tried it with, and on
which arch? (applies for Neil too).
Thanks for the feedback
Regards
,Cyprien