From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-lisp+bounces-254-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CC3C13827E
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 20:05:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 83329E0AD6;
	Wed, 11 Dec 2013 20:05:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from nimiux.org (nimiux.org [176.31.114.133])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3AA7E0AD6
	for <gentoo-lisp@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 20:04:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bolita.nimiux.org (unknown [89.7.128.183])
	by nimiux.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 22A7620050
	for <gentoo-lisp@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 21:04:56 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 21:05:51 +0100
From: Chema Alonso <nimiux@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-lisp@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-lisp] Stabilization of last versions of sbcl and asdf on
 amd64
Message-ID: <20131211200551.GA6537@filladhoo>
Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-lisp@lists.gentoo.org
References: <20131209153357.GA29832@filladhoo>
 <alpine.LFD.2.03.1312100159580.15577@star.inp.nsk.su>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-lisp@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-lisp+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-lisp+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-lisp+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Lisp mail <gentoo-lisp.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-lisp@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-To: gentoo-lisp@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.03.1312100159580.15577@star.inp.nsk.su>
Organization: gentoo.org 
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Archives-Salt: 7b74e252-942c-402c-8051-4f0d664a3d6d
X-Archives-Hash: 5bfe9a5815ef397b7029e30f33ea92c1


--oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 02:11:05AM +0700, grozin@gentoo.org wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Dec 2013, Chema Alonso wrote:
> > BTW sbcl-1.1.14 is out there, I've tested it on amd64 using the ebuild
> > for 1.1.12 and it builds and runs fine. Is it ok to push it to the tree?
> Thanks, I've committed it.
>=20
> > WRT bugs 485630 [1] and 485632 [2], I've tested the last vesions of
> > sbcl and asdf, particularly:
> >
> > dev-lisp/sbcl-1.1.12
> > dev-lisp/asdf-3.0.2.4
> > dev-lisp/uiop-3.0.2.4
> >
> > They build and run with no problesms on amd64. All tests pass.
> >
> > As an amd64 arch tester is ok for me to stabilize them.
> >
> > Any comments/problems?
> I think it's OK to stabilize it on amd64.
>=20
> The bug #486552 is a major problem: nobody can compile any version of sbc=
l=20
> on x86, starting from some moment between May and August 2013, due to som=
e=20
> change in something completely unrelated to sbcl. So, on x86 it definitel=
y=20
> should not be stabilized.
>=20
> By the way, the original reporter of this bug had this problem on an amd6=
4=20
> system; only after he fully updated it to ~amd64, the problem had=20
> disappeared. I suppose you have tested on a stable amd64, right? So, it=
=20
> seems that the problem disappeared, and stabilizing on amd64 is OK.
>=20
> Andrey
>=20

Hi,

There are problems [1] with the stabilization of =3Ddev-lisp/asdf-3.0.2.4
on amd64.
Apparently =3Ddev-lisp/asdf-3.0.2.4 and =3Ddev-lisp/gentoo-init-0.1 can't
be installed at the same time due to asdf-3.0.2.4 dependencies:

DEPEND=3D"!dev-lisp/cl-${PN}
        !dev-lisp/asdf-binary-locations
        !dev-lisp/gentoo-init
        !<dev-lisp/asdf-2.33-r3
        doc? ( virtual/texi2dvi )"

Sorry for not to test more thoroughly.

Should I rollback the stabilization?

Thanks in advance.

[1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D485632#c2

--oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJSqMWfAAoJEA2sAkrWKOU2bucH/2GiXbXfg9sfdbCBKeht7Je3
+gnT6UwNHQJ8T745OwywOfrPKgFAqz8i5kL7pesLOaPZZa3rBlVlHxm7Cl6NFUb3
kgb4QdWReXN3T6N8wqKBO6mp/v98KkqJYBddfyDUMXkrc6Q75l6mvHJvC69fn2Rf
odsLj+GV9cp/A55n5jBGOTPIN8zEHCnSTiOJ8N3jr57qZci0wPHd/dXljSiXxE1M
BOUr1KE2tGdK1KLG74Qh13NgwFb//9ixGvWPDBDYTUCkpbsesRQK/Nt/iBYvdS+o
1tvPr+ek9f2xnuIc0Tjfwb8DO9iAzswRne+h7mrPEGpNl/b1mUGsLu9+cAyI3pc=
=Alrh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI--