From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDC2113827E for ; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 15:33:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 387FAE0BEF; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 15:33:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99F52E0BEF for ; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 15:33:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [89.7.128.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nimiux) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6A4DA33DA86 for ; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 15:33:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2013 16:33:57 +0100 From: Chema Alonso To: Gentoo Lisp Subject: [gentoo-lisp] Stabilization of last versions of sbcl and asdf on amd64 Message-ID: <20131209153357.GA29832@filladhoo> Mail-Followup-To: Gentoo Lisp Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Lisp mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-lisp@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-lisp@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM" Content-Disposition: inline Organization: Gentoo Linux X-URL: http://www.gentoo.org/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: 204410fa-0229-450e-ae4e-1c2b3daeaf1b X-Archives-Hash: d5a5fd2db35a0536d80ed671e67904f8 --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Hi all, WRT bugs 485630 [1] and 485632 [2], I've tested the last vesions of sbcl and asdf, particularly: dev-lisp/sbcl-1.1.12 dev-lisp/asdf-3.0.2.4 dev-lisp/uiop-3.0.2.4 They build and run with no problesms on amd64. All tests pass. As an amd64 arch tester is ok for me to stabilize them. Any comments/problems? BTW sbcl-1.1.14 is out there, I've tested it on amd64 using the ebuild for 1.1.12 and it builds and runs fine. Is it ok to push it to the tree? Thanks. Regards. [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485630 [2] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485632 --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJSpeLlAAoJEA2sAkrWKOU2Qj8H/jn4Ht5c6I7kB9qJodBeKeQX WReMw6hCuPsGTG8zM5JAWtfg3SCOPrFg49n1vfLsqQuFmTqBMY40TMLv3pGfZzqA IuNpYdSASmuYFjELErLZL49NuyN0ef4N4BeF2cYBT8+FSMorkp+NtxU1RtH2Wu94 5VWaxxAhgZXzZrKVJto96KtZXksp35Bdws/WVu/Uxp/WUoGpASeKrkLv+2jUdRjs trPKO1Zi2JcJv10XpDdP4pq6gDQ0v6gcFh8xSeIaxrnz7154Thc88ayNXYtW5GDA OtDq6gJa/bwPIjTASO0e1sjLrnZO7epHYHx6BvMmuaeL4/9FS/JGYuKVjqJMevE= =8Cf3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM--