From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-lisp+bounces-247-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDC2113827E
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon,  9 Dec 2013 15:33:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 387FAE0BEF;
	Mon,  9 Dec 2013 15:33:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99F52E0BEF
	for <gentoo-lisp@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon,  9 Dec 2013 15:33:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (unknown [89.7.128.183])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: nimiux)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6A4DA33DA86
	for <gentoo-lisp@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon,  9 Dec 2013 15:33:04 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2013 16:33:57 +0100
From: Chema Alonso <nimiux@gentoo.org>
To: Gentoo Lisp <gentoo-lisp@lists.gentoo.org>
Subject: [gentoo-lisp] Stabilization of last versions of sbcl and asdf on amd64
Message-ID: <20131209153357.GA29832@filladhoo>
Mail-Followup-To: Gentoo Lisp <gentoo-lisp@lists.gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-lisp@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-lisp+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-lisp+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-lisp+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Lisp mail <gentoo-lisp.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-lisp@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-To: gentoo-lisp@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM"
Content-Disposition: inline
Organization: Gentoo Linux
X-URL: http://www.gentoo.org/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Archives-Salt: 204410fa-0229-450e-ae4e-1c2b3daeaf1b
X-Archives-Hash: d5a5fd2db35a0536d80ed671e67904f8


--cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline

Hi all,

WRT bugs 485630 [1] and 485632 [2], I've tested the last vesions of
sbcl and asdf, particularly:

dev-lisp/sbcl-1.1.12
dev-lisp/asdf-3.0.2.4
dev-lisp/uiop-3.0.2.4

They build and run with no problesms on amd64. All tests pass.

As an amd64 arch tester is ok for me to stabilize them.

Any comments/problems?

BTW sbcl-1.1.14 is out there, I've tested it on amd64 using the ebuild
for 1.1.12 and it builds and runs fine. Is it ok to push it to the tree?

Thanks.

Regards.

[1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485630
[2] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485632

--cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJSpeLlAAoJEA2sAkrWKOU2Qj8H/jn4Ht5c6I7kB9qJodBeKeQX
WReMw6hCuPsGTG8zM5JAWtfg3SCOPrFg49n1vfLsqQuFmTqBMY40TMLv3pGfZzqA
IuNpYdSASmuYFjELErLZL49NuyN0ef4N4BeF2cYBT8+FSMorkp+NtxU1RtH2Wu94
5VWaxxAhgZXzZrKVJto96KtZXksp35Bdws/WVu/Uxp/WUoGpASeKrkLv+2jUdRjs
trPKO1Zi2JcJv10XpDdP4pq6gDQ0v6gcFh8xSeIaxrnz7154Thc88ayNXYtW5GDA
OtDq6gJa/bwPIjTASO0e1sjLrnZO7epHYHx6BvMmuaeL4/9FS/JGYuKVjqJMevE=
=8Cf3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM--