From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <gentoo-lisp+bounces-131-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>) id 1Nirbu-0005us-JT for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 15:51:14 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 68A0AE0642; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 15:51:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com (out2.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 469B1E0642 for <gentoo-lisp@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 15:51:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.internal [10.202.2.42]) by gateway1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EABE7DD83F; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 10:51:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from heartbeat2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.161]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 20 Feb 2010 10:51:09 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=messagingengine.com; h=subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version; s=smtpout; bh=NPIxgSbFQnsfj5GCIHD2xDAqgSs=; b=t2pO2e3aoOczpgTfTjC29Z9F/ok1GZ5FW5hgi08cmi1hVw/iuqEb11qJE+wlDiX2wqNy1uHUq/mGvsVz2crEbZNnxWkFGPKA3W3Q5lFefzGbEhXzjUEylgSeQ4+9vJHAdjMF5rgSv0zXgA/6C9razH8i/RlQroqR6zt5ySN6Yd8= X-Sasl-enc: yTiJuz/JEPgX4B/o18UvQxqBtn0tMoFUSpZOvF5c8b3T 1266681069 Received: from [10.1.1.2] (88-149-209-251.dynamic.ngi.it [88.149.209.251]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AC33C119B5 for <gentoo-lisp@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 20 Feb 2010 10:51:08 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: [gentoo-lisp] stabilization of ecls-9.12.3 From: Stelian Ionescu <sionescu@cddr.org> To: gentoo-lisp@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.1.10.1002201206400.30224@star.inp.nsk.su> References: <alpine.LRH.1.10.1001101559300.18424@star.inp.nsk.su> <1263150349.9110.31.camel@blackhole.cddr.org> <alpine.LRH.1.10.1002171121030.28175@star.inp.nsk.su> <alpine.LRH.1.10.1002201206400.30224@star.inp.nsk.su> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-UETezyKpJ/zUEujgd9J6" Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 16:51:04 +0100 Message-ID: <1266681064.8594.1.camel@blackhole.cddr.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-lisp@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-lisp+help@lists.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-lisp+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-lisp+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Lisp mail <gentoo-lisp.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-lisp@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.2 X-Archives-Salt: e3866b5e-308d-404a-9001-aa1c3c4866a7 X-Archives-Hash: e197a2f1449095611a34608daa7fd9ae --=-UETezyKpJ/zUEujgd9J6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 12:14 +0600, Andrey G. Grozin wrote: > OK, so I've committed 10.2.1 to the tree. I removed the dependency on=20 > app-text/texi2html because we no longer generate html. >=20 > 10.2.1 successfully compiles maxima; gives 2 unexpected failures in the=20 > maxima testsuite. I think 9.12.3 produced the same 2 failures, so, no=20 > change here. >=20 > What's the reason of ecls-10.2.1_rc1 in the overlay? 10.2.1 is available=20 > for download from sourceforge, why _rc1? Upstream made the mistake of uploading a release candidate as 10.2.1, but that's not an "official" nor a "final" release. --=20 Stelian Ionescu a.k.a. fe[nl]ix Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur. http://common-lisp.net/project/iolib --=-UETezyKpJ/zUEujgd9J6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkuABOgACgkQjWsER8+9ASUffACfQgmmk0DLkkIJxuGXwOycVPQ7 1ZUAnjGnElO/Ls9SoqIBc8yu2a/0KHvs =dS4K -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-UETezyKpJ/zUEujgd9J6--