From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7119B1381F3 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 06:18:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D915CE0A00; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 06:18:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qc0-f180.google.com (mail-qc0-f180.google.com [209.85.216.180]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49FADE09ED for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 06:18:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qc0-f180.google.com with SMTP id a1so7031102qcx.11 for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 23:18:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=0MJZYksNvPuEFr+Cz2s2uA4vM34wn7R9Qd4pdWAHTG8=; b=VuJH3pd9b4m10Cb2+L4u9yqS1pDZXgc41lYNh/QTsA3RYanpXuMkupKg9dd0ebiD6C vMTnHJGoB+6i99pCWPO+4Jw7NdIETioSL/S+nMViLmj7F7SLHgLx8JMVfJsrWa2reJIp VxDA56NyPSRPmCL31riDDpW7TjA0DbL/EcIcJ+jW8dNhYOJ0Zh82xCcHeveasaJs1PA5 oFp2cOgbTkVdqkJ5+7XhL1VaQXcTsG1b7U+ZVQPJoq9qMRnJk8nB3A6JCs5mXwqfjh+M TrjGwZSgKKPoPkcYdrPT/y1sqzlS+Js6PleOAjIktNVpgXE2yVtrEVjJOvlXBdg4XRwA CeRA== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-kernel@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-kernel@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.49.82.115 with SMTP id h19mr31239968qey.62.1372141092475; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 23:18:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.42.65 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 23:18:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <51C909DB.2000802@gmail.com> References: <20130621145801.GA5202@kroah.com> <20130622020259.7a411a7a@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <20130622001303.GA2278@kroah.com> <20130622024516.3a51911e@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <20130622034243.GA2058@kroah.com> <20130622084525.2d1fa03f@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <20130624162710.GA16499@kroah.com> <51C909DB.2000802@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 02:18:12 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-kernel] vanilla-kernel sources should not be marked stable for obsolete versions From: Douglas Dunn To: gentoo-kernel@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b62424a661d6704dff47e9b X-Archives-Salt: a49ca3b2-a070-49ba-8f9c-c82dc1647843 X-Archives-Hash: 85b0a4323b7d4f706a2b9b170aaa3c82 --047d7b62424a661d6704dff47e9b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 A users perspective about vanilla-kernel, but why not just mirror whats available on kernel.org. keep it simple with the versions they offer there, with their longterm stable and slowly remove their EOL, maybe give a warning there till its gone from kernel and then make it gone from the tree. On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Dale wrote: > Greg KH wrote: > > True, so we can keep around 3-4 older ebuilds if needed, per kernel > > release. But who really does a dependency clean these days, I've never > > done one :) So, what's the next step? Should I announce the change to > > -dev? Anyone else really object to it? Other thoughts? thanks, greg k-h > > If you are referring to --depclean, I do that pretty regular here. I > see it being recommended on -user and forums and have even seen it after > a emerge more than once. > > If you are referring to something else, disregard. > > Dale > > :-) :-) > > -- > I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or > how you interpreted my words! > > > --047d7b62424a661d6704dff47e9b Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
A users perspective about vanilla-kernel, but why not just= mirror whats available on kernel.org. ke= ep it simple with the versions they offer there, with their longterm stable= and slowly remove their EOL, maybe give a warning there till its gone from= kernel and then make it gone from the tree.


On Mon, Jun 2= 4, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com> wrote:
Greg KH wrote:
> True, so we can keep around 3-4 older ebuilds if needed, per kernel > release. But who really does a dependency clean these days, I've n= ever
> done one :) So, what's the next step? Should I announce the change= to
> -dev? Anyone else really object to it? Other thoughts? thanks, greg k-= h

If you are referring to --depclean, I do that pretty regular here. = =C2=A0I
see it being recommended on -user and forums and have even seen it after a emerge more than once.

If you are referring to something else, disregard.

Dale

:-) =C2=A0:-)

--
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or ho= w you interpreted my words!



--047d7b62424a661d6704dff47e9b--