From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 296291381F3 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 03:09:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0C768E08BD; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 03:09:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yh0-f52.google.com (mail-yh0-f52.google.com [209.85.213.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65CB6E08BB for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 03:09:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yh0-f52.google.com with SMTP id f10so5324237yha.25 for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 20:09:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=20ZC/DdXMDWxyYgkdpW4WIt20mGnhkeN1LYmnNcP4io=; b=nnMf+bF3twcwINHC9Xy1VEHhElTPnn/6yd9mUCHa9ZUr8mqwTcwoJ+YUJuhvidj0mZ wJjU9g4jJ8f0BydRVJckrlYjawU+Yq5SKFHQk9/WBt7RRsx7y5ncmmetb0fq0zdzVTPD UHfbFspkfMPA9/yDQEUugrQts4g0MrtVjfJKl9Et6mCMFfX1kooyvGZIBsOb7YptW8eh wgRYZs+HYUY1/fmesiXpGgdbt6L3kZs70YCzLWuzKfeM++cPNvcCD8Jfkggn2HyaAtkb aPKNJllrFi6qGtxznW+AReCD7T0SHP61nrAkE8Ynjdn6oCRZmRYu/0EHN87CyU+K5Ov5 BWTA== X-Received: by 10.236.155.105 with SMTP id i69mr14315524yhk.159.1372129757641; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 20:09:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-65-0-94-176.jan.bellsouth.net. [65.0.94.176]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id y70sm35089436yhe.15.2013.06.24.20.09.16 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 24 Jun 2013 20:09:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51C909DB.2000802@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 22:09:15 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:20.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/20.0 SeaMonkey/2.17.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-kernel@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-kernel@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-kernel@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-kernel] vanilla-kernel sources should not be marked stable for obsolete versions References: <20130621145801.GA5202@kroah.com> <20130622020259.7a411a7a@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <20130622001303.GA2278@kroah.com> <20130622024516.3a51911e@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <20130622034243.GA2058@kroah.com> <20130622084525.2d1fa03f@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <20130624162710.GA16499@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20130624162710.GA16499@kroah.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 1f560930-573e-4754-8571-4d8d7efc8d4e X-Archives-Hash: faedefe9a230120cf11e9ccc6a91fb90 Greg KH wrote: > True, so we can keep around 3-4 older ebuilds if needed, per kernel > release. But who really does a dependency clean these days, I've never > done one :) So, what's the next step? Should I announce the change to > -dev? Anyone else really object to it? Other thoughts? thanks, greg k-h If you are referring to --depclean, I do that pretty regular here. I see it being recommended on -user and forums and have even seen it after a emerge more than once. If you are referring to something else, disregard. Dale :-) :-) -- I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words!