public inbox for gentoo-kernel@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gentoo-kernel] Stabilizing kernels
@ 2010-06-23 19:48 Krzysztof Pawlik
  2010-06-25  9:18 ` Peter Volkov
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Krzysztof Pawlik @ 2010-06-23 19:48 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: Gentoo Kernel List

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 840 bytes --]

Hello,

There's and interesting question: how should kernels different than
gentoo-sources and vanilla-sources be stabilized? So far I was trying to match
base kernel version + genpatches version of tuxonice-sources to gentoo-sources
(ie. when gentoo-sources-2.6.X-rY goes stable I would file a separate bug to
have tuxonice-sources-2.6.X-rZ stabilized too).

There's abug https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=320071 about stabilizing
few tuxonice-sources versions, but it's been quiet since a month.

My question is: should be stabilize non-core (everything other than
{gentoo,vanilla}-sources)? Opinions?

I'm more and more in favor of having tuxonice-sources and ck-sources only in ~arch.

-- 
Krzysztof Pawlik  <nelchael at gentoo.org>  key id: 0xF6A80E46
desktop-misc, java, apache, ppc, vim, kernel, python...


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 554 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-kernel] Stabilizing kernels
  2010-06-23 19:48 [gentoo-kernel] Stabilizing kernels Krzysztof Pawlik
@ 2010-06-25  9:18 ` Peter Volkov
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Peter Volkov @ 2010-06-25  9:18 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-kernel

В Срд, 23/06/2010 в 20:48 +0100, Krzysztof Pawlik пишет:
> There's and interesting question: how should kernels different than
> gentoo-sources and vanilla-sources be stabilized? So far I was trying to match
> base kernel version + genpatches version of tuxonice-sources to gentoo-sources
> (ie. when gentoo-sources-2.6.X-rY goes stable I would file a separate bug to
> have tuxonice-sources-2.6.X-rZ stabilized too).
> 
> There's abug https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=320071 about stabilizing
> few tuxonice-sources versions, but it's been quiet since a month.
> 
> My question is: should be stabilize non-core (everything other than
> {gentoo,vanilla}-sources)? Opinions?
> 
> I'm more and more in favor of having tuxonice-sources and ck-sources only in ~arch.

For openvz-sources we have arrangement with arch teams and I mark them
stable by myself as soon as I think they are stable enough. I guess you
could do the same.

https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198632

-- 
Peter.




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-06-25 10:03 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-06-23 19:48 [gentoo-kernel] Stabilizing kernels Krzysztof Pawlik
2010-06-25  9:18 ` Peter Volkov

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox