From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JqIQm-0001m7-Mp for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 28 Apr 2008 01:45:24 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C5541E0381; Mon, 28 Apr 2008 01:45:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from QMTA06.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta06.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.62.56]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7991E0381 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2008 01:45:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from OMTA01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.11]) by QMTA06.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Jo1f1Z00N0EZKEL5606u00; Mon, 28 Apr 2008 01:45:11 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([71.59.219.205]) by OMTA01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id JplM1Z00D4SVLDz3M00000; Mon, 28 Apr 2008 01:45:22 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=f8unoBtXbi0A:10 a=HL3-_eyIfdsA:10 a=ix-im8zyAAAA:8 a=WaagZx3dCPIkHkrXsEcA:9 a=VVjQgHZ9MDlqQMp75Un_9SHSnyQA:4 a=oltf0pfCdT4A:10 Message-ID: <48152C29.6020800@cesmail.net> Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 18:45:13 -0700 From: "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080213) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-kernel@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-kernel@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-kernel@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-kernel] 2.6.25 performance monitoring features References: <4814C09B.4060008@cesmail.net> <4814C52F.8050002@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4814C52F.8050002@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: f747c865-579b-4a05-8804-645456b0241b X-Archives-Hash: 1b4fcbf4a914b1b73f25bd8aa471dfbc Daniel Drake wrote: > M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote: >> 2. There is a tool called "latencytop" at http://www.latencytop.org/. >> It looks like the kernel patches to support it are in 2.6.25. How does >> one go about requesting "latencytop" in the Portage tree, dependent, >> of course, on 2.6.25 being stabilized? > > It's already in the tree and stabilisation does not depend on 2.6.25 > being stable, I assume it gives some sensible error message if the > feature is not available. > > Ah ... OK ... I have it installed but haven't had a chance to test it yet. -- gentoo-kernel@lists.gentoo.org mailing list