From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FOHD3-0001hw-Ea for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 16:38:21 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.5) with SMTP id k2SGc405006450; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 16:38:04 GMT Received: from mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (mta09-winn.ispmail.ntl.com [81.103.221.49]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k2SGbjqU026817 for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 16:37:49 GMT Received: from aamtaout04-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35]) by mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20060328163745.VUHI27969.mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamtaout04-winn.ispmail.ntl.com> for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 17:37:45 +0100 Received: from [192.168.1.103] (really [82.17.179.110]) by aamtaout04-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20060328163745.TVJT12840.aamtaout04-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@[192.168.1.103]> for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 17:37:45 +0100 Message-ID: <442968CD.2030208@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 17:48:13 +0100 From: Daniel Drake User-Agent: Mail/News 1.5 (X11/20060207) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-kernel@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-kernel@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-kernel@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-kernel] [ANNOUNCE] genpatches-2.6.16-2 release References: <20060328131922.4D385877627@zog.reactivated.net> <20060328132657.GE17806@getafix.willow.local> In-Reply-To: <20060328132657.GE17806@getafix.willow.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 8ce70e12-b28e-45d8-811c-61bdcc116205 X-Archives-Hash: a23baaeb58b9d7f592094802cf487559 John Mylchreest wrote: > On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 02:19:22PM +0100, Daniel Drake wrote: >> Revision 347: >> Linux 2.6.16.1 thanks to Francisco Lloret in bug #127838 (dsd) >> Added: 1000_linux-2.6.16.1.patch > > Since were bunlding these whole now, should we just start naming the > ebuilds correctly instead? I don't think so. 2 -stable releases in the 2.6.15 cycle didn't have any immediate corresponding gentoo-sources bump since the patches were already included. The fact that we include patches alongside -stable means that using their notation isn't entirely accurate in our situation. Daniel -- gentoo-kernel@gentoo.org mailing list